Canada General

File: IMG_0876.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

First for sunday morning shooting.

File: 1490941478543.jpg (187KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 2048x1152px

WHO READY FOR BERNIER 2019?

File: IMG_0880.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

I tried one of those 20 rounder rem700 mags in my M14. It fits, but can only cycle 15 rounds somewhat reliably before the follower binds.

>>33957558
Yeah man! Daddy wants a FAL!

>>33957608
time for some DIY anti-tilt

File: IMG_7281.png (1MB, 1136x640px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1136x640px

>>33955856
Once I finish paying for that Sten, I'm probably gonna buy back my retro Norc and that retro A1-ish carbine at the gun shop and do pic related. Though I think I'd need to weld/shim part of the lower to accept the auto sear.
You want controllable Full Fun? Try an A1, with that 20in barrel and rifle-length gas system.

>>33957608
You got better than the average then mine jams every 3rds.

>>33957707
>controllable
a functional stock over muh aesthetics and a bit of upper body strength should work just as well.

File: 20170402_113440.jpg (4MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 5312x2988px

Canadian tire has them for 199.99 right now.

>>33958119
Hmmm I wonder if they still have them in crates, it would be glorious to cart out a crate of rifles and three crates of ammo. Now I really wish I had money to spend on more guns and ammo.

>>33958298
Its Canadian tire, guaranteed i you asked to buy a crate of rifles theyd either flag your pal and report you for possible terrorism, or theyd save all the possible information they can get from you and report you for possible terrorism. Place is as bad as cabelas when it come to buying guns.

>>33957617
What about a select fire ak? :D

File: P1040031.jpg (30KB, 645x120px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 645x120px

>Ross Rilfe 1905 – 303 British, Surplus Rifle with FREE SHIPPING $299.99

Is it worth it guys? The idea of having an old Canadian rifle is appealing but I know fuck all about how reliable they are to shoot compared to other surplus. Any known issues?

Just voted Bernier but really feeling do not think will see any reform to the firearms act.

It just won't go through parliament. Maybe mag restrictions, etc but idk man..

prove me wrong? id love to be wrong

where can i shoot non-restrict near/in montreal?

>>33959115
your local mosque

File: RCMP_Wojack.jpg (67KB, 572x626px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 572x626px

>>33959172

File: shit.jpg (55KB, 500x473px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 500x473px

>>33959186

File: IMG_9992.png (276KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 700x700px

>>33959172

File: TNA.jpg (71KB, 1150x521px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1150x521px

What's a good optic for my AR? I have remorse over getting rid of my Vortex and it sounds like the Bushnell is sort of shit. Shooting out to 300 yards maybe.

>>33959462

What's you budget?

>>33959503

Like $500-600.

>>33958904
Ross 1905's or Mk2's are pretty good rifles. Very accurate out to around 650m(or whatever the max effective range of 303 is).

Downside's is they are both long and heavy, ammo is expensive and parts are difficult to come by if its damaged.

Also if the barrel is in good condition (ex. frosted bore, no major pitting) that price is pretty good.

>>33959462
Cheap 1x holosuns
Cheap magnified combat Primary arms 2.5x or 3x

>>33959519
Thanks for the info on the Ross. I doubt i will shoot it very often, irrelevant of the condition, but i certainly dont like to own firearms I cant shoot if I wanted to. There wasn't much of a reference at other stores to compare pricing so the feedback is good to have.

>>33959515

I'm pretty fond of my Vortex Strike eagle 1-6x
I use mine out to 500 yds
I'll probably be getting the 1-8x for my acr soon

What part of an AR-15 is registered as a restricted weapon? Is it the lower? What happens if I want to put a new upper on it?

>>33959462
TNA shit is chink tier btw.

Buy a nice set of rings if you're buying a half decent scope.

I'd just go with a primary arms fixed power scope.

>>33957558
Or Erin O'Tool.. either would be great.

Wait no, Maxime as PM, O'Tool for Public Safety Minister.

>>33960610
Lower is the restricted firearm. If you change the uppers, you're technically supposed to call the firearms office within 30 days to tell them your rifle specs have changed.

>>33958341
I've never understood the idea behind buying a crate of rifles.

That said I'd buy a crate of AK's without a second thought.

>>33960693
Arming 15+ people with half Decent rifles. 15+ people with sks's is a pretty decent guerrilla force. With training theyre even better, ive got around 40 guns, so thats like 30 people i can arm with rifles and side arms, thats plenty enough to secure my neighborhood and surrounding farms which will be collectivized and used to only support our community.

File: tucker.png (190KB, 353x353px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 353x353px

>>33960808
>which will be collectivized

>>33960870
Kulaks aren't allowed on this board, cyka.

>>33960870
Like many things it works well for small tightly knit communities and falls apart when the government forces it done across the board.

>>33960870
Well yea. Sure the famers might go hungry from time to time we gotta feed the community if were to get all the community incentives done like public roadworks, community well and fresh water programs, or buliding community rail yard to take control of a section of railway that passes through our neighborhood, as well as taking control of several key mines and power plants

>>33958386
desu at this point I'd be happy to just unfuck my VZ magazines and be legally allowed to keep my gun loaded in case of a home invasion so I don't have to make up some elaborate story about me opening my safe like a ninja if some shit happens.

>>33959078
Depends on whether they get 40+% of the seats or not. Not much you can do with a minority government.

File: commie tears.png (286KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 480x480px

>>33960808
>tfw there would finally be a reason to join the forces if autistic Marxist guerrillas armed with low tier slavshit attempted to start their own communities

Please do it.

>>33960969
Theres nothing wrong with wanting to make your community completely independent. I have 4 acres of land, if i used it all the grow food, i alone could feed my neighborhood depending what is grown. Probably potatoes cause thats what i have the most experience with growing. And this idea literally is only good for rural acreage communities that consists mainly of young families and old people

>>33961007
>Probably potatoes
more like because that's all you can grow in alberta soil

>>33961007
>Moleman is a literal potato nigger

Color me surprised.

>>33961054
Potatoes and wheat all you need comrade, make hearty potato and bread soup

File: Iphone 2-27-2017 1543.jpg (1MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2448x3264px

>>33960693
Put a trigger lock on it and leave it set to the combination.

>>33961075
Im not Irish. Id grow russian turnip but the ground here isnt hard and dry like russian turnip

>>33961077
you're well on track for a historically accurate miserable existence in that case

>>33961085
Is that z xenomorph skull in the background?
> What kind of fucking hunter ARE you?

>>33960808
yeah bums with guns that'll stop big data, $20 grenade drones or actual soldiers

>commie logic

So now that my next purchase is a Sten, should I do a
>Sten, M305/"M21",1911 build, and go full MAC-V/LRRP
or
>Sten, Sniper Enfield, Webley build

>>33960808
>i have around 40 guns
Yeah right.

File: IMG_6196.jpg (376KB, 1398x1122px) Image search: [Google]

376KB, 1398x1122px

>>33961126
Black bear.

>>33961265
he's including all his neighbour's guns, as those will be collectivized by him as well

>>33960650

Could you explain to me like I'm retarded what difference rings make? It seems like as long as they're tight they're basically all the same, but I must be missing something.

>>33961173

>What is Vietnam, Afghanistan

>>33961324
Whichever side has rules of engagement loses.

I'm in Calgary, do I need to have a range membership if I want to buy restricted guns?

>>33961324
The NVA had a well equipped army. This includes tanks, and SAMs, etc. The Mujahideen got slaughtered and wouldn't survive without foreign aid.

Some retarded tripfag would get a JDAM through his window and his gay commie community would get leveled by American Apaches.

>>33961367
You need that anywhere in Canada

>>33961324
Drones and satellite imaging didn't fucking exist and alberta farms aren't a fucking foreign jungle.

>>33961374
not in ontario

>>33961380
>You don't need a range membership to own restricted guns in Ontario

If that were true I would own handguns right now.

>>33961456
It is true. how are there people that don't know this?

File: 1493558506626.gif (354KB, 240x200px) Image search: [Google]

354KB, 240x200px

>>33961482
But it's not true.

Honestly don't know if I'm falling for bait or not because Alberta intellectuals

You're definitely retarded. Ontario is an exception to the rule.

Granted, most ranges won't let you shoot restricteds with out memberships, but some will.

>>33961498

It's not the law but provincial CFO's can be petty tyrants that make their own rules. I've heard about this from 100 ontarians bitching on friendbook and CGN.

BC demands a range membership as well.

>>33961513
>>33961522

If you shoot a restricted on Crown Land in Ontario the RCMP are going to wreak your shit.

Stop spreading mis info, I took the RPAL course in Ontario and to be able to purchase a handgun or restricted rifle you must have a valid range membership and get a transfer slip in order to bring it to said range to legally discharge it.

>>33961559

I didn't say you should or could shoot restricted outside of a range, and I re-enforced the point that i've heard the ontario CFO requires a range membership. I don't know what misinformation you think I'm spreading m8

>>33961559
>If you shoot a restricted on Crown Land in Ontario the RCMP are going to wreak your shit.
you're struggling with reading comprehension. nobody is talking about shooting restricteds on crown land you idiot. that is still illegal.

>I took the RPAL course in Ontario...
So did everyone else. Instructors are not law makers or the CFO. Go buy a restricted and you'll see you can effortlessly, fuck face. You put n/a or 'wait list' as range membership and your purchase will go through, every time because the lack of ranges is a recognized problem by the ontario CFO.

>>33961367

Yes, the CFO will not approve you if you do not have one. Get an associate membership at csc for 100 bux or something

>>33961617

>dingdingding
we have a winrar

>>33961617
>All thing anger

You are single handedly ruining /k/

>>33961559
> you must have a valid range membership and get a transfer slip in order to bring it to said range to legally discharge it
this part is true, the rest isn't. In Ontario, you can BUY, BUT NOT USE RESTRICTEDS without a range membership. This is easily verifiable.

>>33961647
stop setting arbitrary and unnecessarily high standards for discourse on this awful site. I want to keep it awful. fuck off if you're such a sensitive little bitch and can't handle being wrong.

>>33961689
?

I'm not that guy, chill out.

>>33961678
>BUT NOT USE RESTRICTEDS without a range membership.
more incorrect information. there are a select number of ranges that allow use of restricteds by non-members.

File: 1.jpg (94KB, 900x697px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 900x697px

>>33961324
Vietnamese got fucking devastated by that war and the only reasons they didn't fall were America pussying out, not doing enough to severe supplies and aid given to the by the Soviets and Chinks.

Something reets with armed with sks's don't have.

>>33961372
The only way you can pull it off is go satinwoods after fucking up infrastructure. Having a fixed position is a death sentence.

>>33961313
The better the scope mounts are, the better they're at holding zero under abuse. QC is another, having fucky mounts sucks.

Doesn't mean you need 1500000000$ gorillian dollar mounts, just don't buy chinkshit garbage mounts for anything larger than a .22

>>33961721
Good luck transferring it there without a membership

>>33961720
I don't care, you're all cancer. stop trying to moderate discussion and instead focus on making meaningful and factually correct contributions.

>>33961733
>transferring it there
what the fuck does that even mean? Do you realize what Bill C-42 allows us to do by virtue of restricted ownership, independent of range membership? Transportation to range is part of the 'special conditions' added to your license after your first restricted firearm purchase.

What the fuck is even going on here?

From what I've read some autist thinks RPAL holders in Ontario have to be members of a range to have restricted firearms?

Fucking spicy meme

>>33961735
You are swell.

Hope your life ends at your own hand at a young age before everyone you care about dies of gut cancer

>>33961916
sort yourself out.

File: jordanmeme.jpg (167KB, 928x906px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 928x906px

>>33961998

>>33960668
that sounds like a "common sense" guess, but is actually incorrect
>dude buys a stripped or fully decked out lower, has it registered and then shipped to him
have you thought of that scenario? if barrel length was an essential parameter of AR's registration, you wouldn't be able to buy a lower by itself. the reason AR is modular is the reason it's Restricted regardless of BL or caliber. the upper is treated like an accessory, same as handguards and stocks.

you have to report any changes that lead to changes in classification, since a 20" upper and 10.5" upper on your AR don't change the fact that your firearm is still a Restricted, you don't need to report said changes every time you make them.
>the super safe lawyer answer is that you always have 30 days to report any cange, so if you put the upper on and then out the old one on back within 30 days.. etc
but it's a moot point, since the 30 days rule has to do with changes that alter the firearm in such a way as to change classification, which swapping out the upper does not

you could buy a stripped Anderson lower that's marked "multi-caliber". then your AR would be registered as multi-caliber. they don't care if you put a .300 blackout or 5.56 or 7.62x39 upper on it, it's Restricted regardless of caliber or barrel length being 30" or 7.5" and as long as you abide by the Restricted rules, you're fine.

note: ARs will never be NR for that very reason, since they're so modular and they can easily be converted to SBR and back, they'll just always be treated like SBRs regardless.

>>33958341
>Place is as bad as cabelas when it come to buying guns.
The worst thing to have happened to me when I bought a gun at Cabela's was that they forgot to remove the trigger lock before they handed it to me.

I was not happy when I unboxed my rifle at home and saw a neon orange hunk of metal with a keyhole enveloping the trigger.

>>33962476
>ARs will never be NR for that very reason, since they're so modular and they can easily be converted to SBR and back, they'll just always be treated like SBRs regardless.

The only reason they're restricted is because they weren't placed on the prohib list due to their popularity in competition shooting sports.
Modularity has nothing to do with it. You could get a restricted length barrel for most rifles and you don't need a PAL to purchase barrels.
The XCR, Tavor, ACR, and plenty other popular rifles can change calibers on the fly by changing a bolt and barrel.

>>33962476
>the reason AR is modular is the reason it's Restricted
No. It's restricted because it was prohibited at the same time as the AK. Successful lobbying managed to get it down to only restricted.

>>33962476
>ARs will never be NR for that very reason
Bernier style classification would be based on overall length. I remember reading >26" = NR. Makes a lot more sense, and it would make something like a DD Mk18 NR. We can only dream.

>>33962476
Dude, if that was the case, then 870's would be restricted by name too.

When you change the configuration of a firearm, you have 30 days to contact the CFC to have the status changed.

>>33962562
>Dude, if that was the case, then 870's would be restricted by name too.
Doesn't Norinco/Dominion Arms/Chink Industries have that Grizzly shotgun with the ridiculously short barrel?

who's got the best deal of cases of 9mm right now in the GTA. just signed up for black badge course over the long weekend, and i have zero ammo right now.

>>33962571

It seems to be with manually cycled firearms and some .22's that barrel length doesnt deem it NR or R, but overall length determines its legality

>>33962544
ARs are cheap, common and the incredible ease of turning it from rifle length to SBR didn't have anything that readily available to be compared to back when the law was written.

I agree, the only reason it's not a prohibited was the sports lobby, but with uppers being unregulated and the ease of a toolless 2secons swap and monkey could perform is too apparent to even the most firearms uneducated politician to ever allow it to be NR. which is why, while it dodged getting prohibited, it'll also never be anything but restricted

>>33962562
yeah and 870 also doesn't have a maximum magazine capacity limit.
you're retarded, 870 is a manual action firearm, only OAL applies to it
different rule set, dingus

>if you change configuration
the fuck does that mean? if you change out the carbune buffer for the H2 buffer you need to call and re-register? if you change the weight of your trigger? if you change the stock? AR lower is the only part that is registered and it's already Restricted, you can't make any changes to it that would make it Non-Restricted and you aren't allowed to make any changes to it that would make it Prohibited, so what the fuck kind of "configuration" changes are you talking about? a stripper AR lower is the firearm, it doesn't have a barrel length in its registration, it's always Restricted, which part of that is not clear?

>>33962611

But with that logic I can turn my NR ACR into a restricted ACR with the simple turn of a single nut. About as easy as swapping an upper.
Yet the ACR is not restricted by name like the AR

>>33962687
>muh niche modular firearm that came long aftet the series of bans VS the most common cilivilan model of a service rifle and the poster child for bans
but you are right, it would be. thankfully, it isn't exactly logic and we are not currently in a frenzy of bans

>>33962680
Swapping a barrel on an 870 for a 12.5" one would change its classification, same as swapping an upper on an AR, you extraordinary cunt.

>>33962476
>>33962680
disregard that, apparently I suck cocks and guzzle horse semen. you do have a just the lower registration, but if you call them and ask, they tell you that once you complete your AR, they want you to update them with caliber and bl info and you'll get an new certificate that has that info on it.
>I guess they want your upper too when the confiscations come

>>33962793

>Swapping a barrel on an 870 for a 12.5"

if the barrel is manufactured to that length from the factory, and the guns meets overall length, it doesn't change classification.

> same as swapping an upper on an AR

again, AR is restricted by name, swapping an upper does not change classification. RCMP may you want to re-up, but they can get fucked.

>>33962793
no you colossal fucking moron, if the OAL is within the law, which it would be and it's a barrel that was manufactured as 12.5" you can swap the barrels and it remains NR. A fucking 8.5" pump grizzly is NR, you can put a 18.6" barrel or 12.5" barrel on it, as long as they're new barrels manufactured like that; you aren't allowed to cut the barrel down yourself; that is haram

it's literally not the same thing and isn't even a grey area like the interpretation of the law that has to deal with AR lower being the firearm but RCs wanting to know which upper you put on it for their t records. it's a law having to do with manual action being tovetned by OAL only while center fired semi auto is governed by both OAL and barrel length

>>33960808
>>33960969
Is Moleman a commie? I never really paid attention to what he was before, but I wasn't expecting that.

>>33960969
Anyway, Canada isn't going to have to deal with guerillas unless the US falls apart.


And going back to buying a crate of guns, I suppose that idea where you turn it into a coffee table with a glass top so you can see them all lined up inside is pretty neat.

>>33962838
>swapping an upper does not change classification. RCMP may you want to re-up, but they can get fucked.

would be funny if you called every time you threw a 10.5" barrel on your AR for a CQB match, called them to change to you 20" for long range match, then called again to change back to your normal 16" upper.

>>33962853
What do guns have anything to do with that gorilla- no wait, never mind.

>>33962895
gorilla? wat?

>>33962895
>no wait, never mind.
>still posts

>>33962853
The fuck is your problem? He was trying to illustrate there is a myriad of guns on the market (and ones who have been here for a long time) which can swap barrels between NR and R just as easy as an AR15. See BRS99 or XCR. The 'muh modularity' is not a excuse for making AR15s restricted.

>>33962967
emm, no, he literally said that changing barrel on 870 to 12.5" would change its classifovation. dealing with a basic firearms laws illiterate here, that's all

>>33962996
On a pistol grip 870 it would. Jesus Christ you're and unpleasant cunt.

>>33963009
Uh, dude, no it wouldn't. If it's a manual action centrefire, as long as the OAL is over 26 inches, it's non-restricted. Pistol grip doesn't matter.

>>33963033
Yeah it would. An 870 with a pistol grip and a 12.5" barrel is below 26".

>>33963009
you can put a pistol grip on it, but only if it meets the OAL requirement
You can shorten the barrel, and you can shorten the stock, but you might run into trouble if you do both

>>33963058
He JUST saud in the post you quoted as long as it meets the OAL its g2g...

File: 42d0f32a6b76790e8d6f1ad6fcd30dbe_400x400.png (160KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 400x400px

>>33963080
>g2g
ok c u bye

>>33963009
except nobody ever said pistol grip, stop grasping.
it's clear he doesn't know the difference between BBL + OAL for center fired SA vs OAL only for manual action. I'm not the only one who replied to that autism and I wouldn't be so unpleasant and maybe just politely correct him, if he didn't aggressively try to make an argument about the more debatable area of the law while exhibiting absolute ignorance of the clear basics.

>>33963093
Fuck, right in the nostalgia.

>>33963093
meant to say gtg as in good to go, but Im old and the MSN shit is still reflex

>>33963080
The original post was about how there are other firearms on the market which can be easily changed from NR to R. IE: a pistol gripped 870's classification would be changed with a barrel swap, just as easy as swapping an upper on an AR. Using 'muh modular gun' is not a valid reason for why ARs are restricted.

>>33963131
>I'm just gonna add the "pistol grip" to the argument, nobody will notice
PROHIBITED!!!

>>33963131
>Using 'muh modular gun' is not a valid reason for why ARs are restricted.
I agree with this
BUT
changing the barrel length on an 870 will not change its classification, and 870 will never be R
Either NR, or if under legal oal, Prohib

guys where can I get an M16A1 clone in Canada? It seems hard to find A1 monolithic uppers.

What do? Is it possible to get an A1 clone for sub-1000$?

>>33963131
AR was the only high profile easy-change bbl readily available to the public at the time it was being classified (antis wanting to make it prohibited outright being a different issue), saying that played no part in its classification is autistic at best. yes NOW that logic doesn't apply, good for you, I'm sure they'll look at XCR or ACR and reclassify ARs based on bbl right away

>>33963195
Canada Ammo has Norc 20" versions for like $500 that might work for you? also there are some beat to shit old C8 uppers with monolithic upper carry handles floating around a few dealers (SFRC has then I think)

>>33963286
yeah I've been eyeballing those. They might be the best cheap option for now. problem is, not's not an A1 buttstock, and I think the upper is a bit different somehow.

I'll check out those C8 uppers.

>>33963107
I miss collecting emoticons. There were some interesting ones out there, seemingly endless unique ones.

>>33963131
>>33963161
>>33963167

It doesn't even need to be a pistol grip. A folding stock with a 12" barrel would be restricted, too, as it's based on the folded/collapsed length. The post clearly said changing barrel or stock, didn't it?

>>33963720

No it wouldnt be restricted, but it would be prohib.
The gsg STG44 .22 has a 16" barrel and it is NR
I have a 12" shotgun barrel and it too is NR
The argument of the pistol grip only applied when it makes the OAL too short to still be legal.
The ONLY ONLY time a pistol grip becomes a problem is when it makes the oal too short.

The ORIGINAL point the fellow made changing the barrel length could turn something NR to R without the rcmp knowing BUT when the 870 was brought up, the mistake was the poster thought a barrel shorter than 18.5" on a pump action shotgun make it restricted. It does not

>>33963991
there's a Dominion Arms shotgun that's like, a 12" barrel, it's NR

File: implied facepalm.jpg (23KB, 456x297px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 456x297px

>>33963991
>No it wouldnt be restricted, but it would be prohib.

File: 18382674_1897981790458611_6433877557916991488_n[1].jpg (206KB, 750x937px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 750x937px

type 81 handguards. they look like shit.

still want.

>>33964006

Yeah I know, there's plenty of pump shotguns with short barrels
Point Im making is they're all NR, only semi auto's are restricted in regards to barrel length.

>>33964020

Please elaborate then
shotgun with pistol grip and 12" barrel would make is wayy under required OAL = prohib

>>33964048
A manually operated centerfire or a rimfire rifle (including semi) under 26" OAL is RESTRICTED, not prohibited.

>>33964006
>>33964020

sigh
>"Prohibited firearms include: shotguns that have been altered by sawing or other means so that their barrel length is less than 457 mm OR their overall length is less than 660 mm" - rcmp grc website

File: d3nh0.jpg (150KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 640x480px

>>33964091
Jesus Christ you're dense. A folding stock does not a prohib make.

This Grizzly MAG has an 8.5" barrel and falls under 26" OAL. Guess what: It's only restricted.

File: l2read.jpg (206KB, 1440x871px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 1440x871px

>>33964116

I never said folding stock
I said pistol grip
I already know the folding stock and a short barrel would make it restricted.
A short barrel and a fixed stock (26" oal) is NR

>>33964116
According to Hical and CanadaAmmo, that 8.5" Grizzly is NON-restricted.

http://hical.ca/dominion-arms-grizzly-8-5-magfed/
https://www.canadaammo.com/product/detail/dominion-arms-grizzly-8-5-magfed-shotgun/

>>33964165
Different stock. The above pic was a custom job back when the Grizzly MAG shotguns first got here. The barrel was made by Dlask. It's just a bit shy of 26.

>>33964165

thats a fixed stock, it if has a folder it would be a different story

see >>33964160

>>33964160
>L2read
He says, while somehow getting "by sawing or other method" out of attaching a pistol grip or folding stock.

File: IMG_1540.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>33963309
Buy the Norc 311-1, throw on different furniture. It's an A1 clone, minus the furniture and finish.

>>33964048
in the end, all this just goes to show that our laws our retarded if it even needs debating.

File: A54C26E2-2957-4B6E-BB6B-696B806C679B-2258-000003CE0C8E3AE7.jpg (58KB, 567x1024px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 567x1024px

>>33963720
no, the original post talked about the barrel only and it was clear the poster didn't know the difference regarding barrel length regulations of center fired semi auto vs manual action

another poster (or the same poster pretending to be another poster) then tried to introduce pistol grip/folding stock into the equation to muddy the waters and turn what was clearly the original poster's ignorance into a semblance of an argument, and calling everyone who challenged his autism an unpleasant person for not being ultra nice to a retard that doesn't know basic firearms law you should know for PAL and calls people "extraordinary cunts" while he flaunts that ignorance.

see original post here: >>33962793
>Swapping a barrel on an 870 for a 12.5" one would change its classification, same as swapping an upper on an AR, you extraordinary cunt.

>>33964202

>"or their overall length is less than 660mm"
Please l2read and take notice of the 'or'

>>33964209
norc 311-1? I have not seen that.

oh, it's the Dominion Arms 556 now. Yeah, that's what I've been eyeballing. It's really cheap.

Where did you get that triangular hand guard though? I've looked at every gun website in Canada, can't find it.

and the A1 buttstock?

>>33964229
BY SAWING OR OTHER MEANS.

>>33964236
That's actually the superior A2 stock (better LOP), and the handguards were given to me.

>>33964229
Barrel length OR OAL.
But only when modified by cutting or similar measures. Swapping parts does meet the court or RCMP definition of altering.
Putting a commercial 8.5" barrel and pistol grip on a pump shotty still only makes it into a restricted firearm.

>>33964251
ah. yeah I've seen A2 buttstocks around.

the handguard seems to be the real bitch to find in Canada.....there's places in the US that sell army surplus M16 furniture. I might have to resort to paying IRunGuns or whoever to import something.....idk

>>33964260
I'm pretty sure furniture is within the Canadian ITAR exemptions.

>>33964250

You read the wrong part.
It says right there on the website, please read it

>>33964273
is it? I always figured all that shit was a pain to get imported. If handguards and buttstocks aren't, then no problem, there's triangular handguards all over the US.

>>33964251
>>33964251
bruh...do you know anything about the recce course, or what should I know before getting into it?

>>33964252

I know, but referring back to the original arguement of modularity, you're not going to find an 870 with a pistol grip and an 10" barrel as far as I know of, you're going to have to use parts to make one yourself. ergo: altering a factory gun

File: ITAR Exemptions.png (100KB, 580x228px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 580x228px

>>33964286
http://www.borderview.com/services/for-individuals/small-parts-exemption-service/

>>33964286
It is.
Manufacturer is supposed to have an export license as well as the exporter. Kind of a pain in the ass to get a company that probably stopped making parts 50 years ago to get a license. With most surplu sparts not really an issue as the US recognises the limited use for them. Anyhting more modern or tactical and they will sometimes go full retard with the regs.

>>33964300
oh. well then. that's easy. So it's only barrels, receivers, and parts of the action that are not permitted.

fantastic. thank you.

Think my next purchase might be one of those chinkshit A1 clones plus some matching furniture....

>>33964323
Cool. Post pics when it's built, eh?

>>33964296
Swapping parts is NOT considered modifying under the law.
Dlask used to sell 4" barreled 870s with a pistol grip. Hundreds were made or sold in the early 00's before the restricted ruling came down.

File: l2readagain.jpg (190KB, 1440x871px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1440x871px

>>33964250

look at underlined
>or their overall length is less than 660mm

I know fixating on the sawed barrel part is tempting, but theres 2 requirements in that paragraph

>>33964333
>rifles and shotguns that have been ALTERED by sawing or other means so that their [...] overall length is less than 660mm

Your brain not having enough RAM to parse a sentence with 27 words and two dimensions doesn't make everyone ELSE in this thread a retard, Anon.

>>33964329

They might be an exception?
I know the Rossi Ranch Hand is under legal OAL and still NR

I like how people are still fighting over what is clearly a moronic level of not understanding the law:

The post that started all of this states:
"Swapping a barrel on an 870 for a 12.5" one would change its classification, same as swapping an upper on an AR, you extraordinary cunt."

A) there is no mention of pistols grip or folding stock, which would be crucial detail to unfucking this argument, and if that would be the argument being made, the person would certainly mention it; therefore, regular 870 remains, and putting a 12.5" barrel on a regular 870 doesn't change its classification, since the OAL would still be NR compliant

B) swapping out the upper on the AR DOES NOT change its CLASSIFICATION. AR-15 and variants are classified as Restricted regardless of caliber or barrel length

This guy clearly has no idea of what he's talking about and you two dummies are fighting over this for the entire thread (although it's safe to assume one of you is the original poster trying to save face)

>>33964370
>arguing over shotguns
bunch of fucking fudds

>>33964328
could be a few months, but definitely

>>33962817
>Own a cheap Anderson lower
>The day arrives when the grabs are grabbed
>CTG, Moleman, and Co. show up to collect muh guns
>Cheerily lead them to basement, hand over Anderson lower
>The walls are adorned with uppers of every imaginable configuration
>A mill, 80% blank already mounted, 30 more in neat rows beside it, stands in the corner
>Smile maniacally at the officers and wish them a good day as they leave

>>33964370
>safe to assume it's the original poster trying to save face
>>33962793
Original poster here, i should have specified i was talking about pistol gripped 870s. I haven't contributed since then, i dont know why this became such a big arguement

>>33964359
The Ranch Hand doesn't fold.
Since it's not a semi and does not fold or collapse to be shorter it's fine the way it is.
Same reason the super short 870s were originally NR.

>>33964427
of course you meant pistol grip, that's why I'm a discussion about barrel length you only talked about barrel swapping and you didn't say anything about pistol girp (the thing that would totally change your argument and would be key to making it a totally different argument)

you also didn't mean that swapping a barrel on 870 woulld CHANGE ITS CLASSIFICATION, you know, SAME AS SWAPPING AN UPPERS ON AN AR.

this is what you do when you got something totally wrong or partially wrong >>33962817

not start to pretend you made the argument you actually didn't and post from your phone to make it look like a different person is defending you

god.. summer is finally fucking here

>>33964515
Christ man. Take a break from 4chan for a while.

>>33964548
fair enough, re-reading my post I can see that it really is time to stop

ITT leaf lawyers

>>33964395
>Anon later found dead in his home
>no foul play suspected
>death ruled as a suicide from 3 self-inflicted gunshots to the back of the head

>>33965014
>next day the papers release more propaganda about how guns are bad and only lead to suicide, and all guns should be banned

File: Mount Stupid.jpg (44KB, 600x444px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 600x444px

>>33965161
People who bring up suicide as a reason to ban guns are either complete retards or absolute scum. When C-68 came into effect the drop in suicide by firearm was met with a proportional increase in suicide by hanging. But I guess the fact that they hang themselves and die anyway doesn't matter as long as they don't do it with a gun.

File: yep.jpg (687KB, 3000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

687KB, 3000x2000px

>>33961227
Webley because ww1 memes and the break action memes

>>33963080
>>33963058

nope
barrels must be 18.5 inches or restricted

http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/cfp-pcaf/faq/index-eng.htm


http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/cfp-pcaf/faq/index-eng.htm

>>33965263
The trouble I have with the argument is that suicide with a gun is more likely to work than other methods, and so while they'll just turn to pills or the rope those will fail more often. Best to just avoid that argument altogether and remember that focusing on mental problems rather than their symptoms is the only thing that can stop suicide.

>>33965478
Pls no. We just finished this.

File: 48375638745345.jpg (94KB, 566x571px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 566x571px

>>33962941
MINDSET

>>33965488
Isn't suicide by gun only like 80% effective?

>>33965488
Negligible increase in "success" rate with guns over hangings.

>>33965395
How rare and expensive are Restricted Webleys? I only ever hear about people asking about MUH ANTIQUES

>>33965501
>>33965505
Wikipedia says guns work 90% of the time, nothing about hanging but 75% of suicide attempts are with drugs, and of those 97% survive.

>>33965514
Checking the Blue Book... The priciest of the service models seems to be the late production Mk VI with 6" barrels, fixed sights in the serial number range of 450k to 454k made from 1922-1935.

The values are given in USD as:
100% = 1,100
98% = 900
95% = 700
90% = 600
80% = 500
70% = 300
60% = 250

The 4" models are listed as having 106mm barrels on Wiki, so it's POSSIBLE that they stay restricted, depending on manufacturing tolerances and shit.

God I fucking hate our gun laws.

File: ooga booga.gif (4MB, 400x373px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 400x373px

>>33965514
I seriously have no idea, and no money of my own yet, just ww1 milsurp hoop dreams and trying to live vicariously through our local friendly RCMP agent.

>>33965690
Huh, so it's conceivable that I could get a decent Webley for a comfy Sten/Webley innawoods pair for less than $1k, eh?

>>33965953
Why do you even care if its R length? Aren't you the 'muh prohibs, fuck the gooberment' guy?

>>33966054
Cost. Antiques will be pricier. Besides, no paperless Weblys have been offered to me yet.

>>33958119
My Canadian Tires don't sell guns. Had to drive out of town to get mine for $249 because everywhere here has them for $349.

>>33958119
What? Which Can Tire are you going to?

>have some custom gun parts made
>work is good, guy tells me to get the things picked up by purelator
>ok
>go to website, fill in info
>53 dollars shipping, steep as hell but what am I gonna do, it's cheaper than driving six hours to guy and six hours back
>all info is correct, package size and weight are exact
>get tracking info, all is well
>see purelator in visa
>for 75 bucks

Fucking nigger fuck cunt shit faggot shipping jew fuck canada

I fucking hate this stupid kike country.

Does 500 bucks plus shipping seem reasonable for a barely used mossberg 590 7 shot?

>>33967042
Does it have the metal trigger guard?

>>33967081
Plastic. Which is weird, I thought all 590s had the metal trigger guard? I got the shotgun awhile back and only put 25 rounds through it, just haven't taken it out of the safe since, and my grandpa is passing his old hunting guns down to me, which includes a shotgun, so I'm trying to sell the 590, don't need two shotguns, especially when I'm already barely shooting the one I own.

>>33967129
Not all models, it's why I asked.

Either way it's still a decent price, if the guy lowballs tell him you can do shipping included but I wouldn't go lower.

>>33967141
Yeah that's what I figured. Just need to be patient I guess. Haven't had a single offer on cgn yet, though knowing them they'll ask if I would be willing to sell it for 200 or something.

>>33967157
Definitely, CGN is mostly faggots but with some patience there's a deal or two to be had.

>>33967166
It's fucking nuts what some of them ask for guns on there. Like 1400 for a vz58. I may as well but one new. They always ask for the selling price of a new one of whatever it is they're selling.

File: Firearm Valhalla Front Cover.jpg (188KB, 371x596px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 371x596px

So, anyone feel like supporting a leaf author? Got a promotion going on today; my first four books are free for ereaders. If you have Kindle Unlimited, they're already available to you, all six of my books.

>Living amongst the Dead
Zombie survival novel set in Canada, focus on realism and survivalism, also, a feminist has a very bad time... two sequels available, third one in the works.

>When her 'No' means 'Yes'
Erotica novel (or a long novella, sort of counts as both). Honestly, feel free to pass this one over, easily my least popular work.

>Firearm Valhalla
HERE we go! Action novelette that's also a bit post-apocalyptic. Gun porn. Dedicated to /k/ in my own special way, you can find it in the Dedication section of the book.

>Another One Please, to Dull the Pain
Drama novella. Essentially written with MGTOW in mind; focuses on a bad marriage and how the husband would pretty much be fucking himself by divorcing. A fellow who had been through some divorces gave it a read. I didn't expect him to like it, but to my surprise he loved it. Said that even though I'm far younger than him and never been married or divorced, it none the less clicked with him. Brought back some memories of some dark times. Very unfortunate, but it was meant as a compliment, and I took it as such.

My other two books are still at $2.99 a piece so only consider those if you like what you read of my free stuff. Oh, and in the UK my fifth book, the first sequel to Living amongst the Dead, is only 0.99 Pounds right up until May 21st is over so the Kindle Countdown discount is going on for quite some time. For those who check my stuff out, I hope you like it!

>>33965953
If you get one that's a little bit worn, yeah. Probably looking at as much as 1.5k for a really nice one.

One day, I'd like to get my hands on a nice webley, if only for a few months, to reverse-engineer it.

>>33960693
Some people are the paranoid types. We think either the government will try to enslave us, society will collapse or something else that will jeopardize the relative safe lives we have.

Get a gun and we can defend ourselves, but what about our significant other? Friends? Family? Neighbours? Most people (exceptions do exist) have a handful of people they care about. In the unlikelihood of something happening, it is a good idea to be well stocked in advance and this includes firearms.

It should be needless to say that most people do not have the money to blow on buying more than one assault rifles at a time, however older rifles - like the Mosin Nagant and SKS - are cheap enough that you can buy them in bulk. The idea of buying a crate of the same model rifles also eliminates the issue of them needing different calibres of ammunition.

Besides, if you have a bunch of the same rifle it also means that you can cannibalize one or two of the rifles for spare parts (that is, if society has collapsed and it is impossible to acquire spare parts otherwise).

>>33967267
It is strange. Even beat to shit or bubba'd guns are listed at store prices often.

>>33966483
Fort McMurray ;)

File: 5197359+_b2828bf116c7dd7d60b2c27038d7cc2d.gif (704KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

704KB, 200x200px

>>33969040
>smiley
Git out!

File: 1474869559640.jpg (67KB, 480x608px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 480x608px

>>33969076
>not understanding irony
Autism
;^)

>>33969101
Takes one to know one.

File: IMG_0344.gif (71KB, 499x269px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 499x269px

explain something to me, /k/

I was lurking in a thread on CGN with all the M&P 15 Sport 2 preorders, trying to gauge people's experience and how each dealer went about it. constantly reading about dealers initiating transfer for guys and then guys saying they already received email from CFO about approval.

my question is: am I not getting something clear or did the rules change and you no longer need to call cfo with reference number and tell them you want Restricted for sports shooting before they complete your transfer. that used to be the mandatory step, so does the dealer now do it for you? did something change? what's this dealer-handled emailing process?

>>33969577
Dealers file transfers for you via an online service.
Its still something you have to do for private sale.

>>33961085
that poor 58 man, make the camo a little better for the sake of the rest of us

>>33969577
Dealer initiates the transfer, you have to call to confirm it.

>>33969631
so there is or isn't a call with the online service? did the rules change is what I'm trying to figure out, since I haven't heard anything here or on cgn about it

>>33970438
how do you know when to call though? is that the email they're talking about?

>>33970852
I've never been called due to a dealer transfer.
Can't say when/if it was changed but its been 2 years since my first R purchase.

Anyone know where to find Lee-Enfield stock sets for sale? I'm restoring a no1mk3* and can't find places that ship to Canada anywhere.

>>33961173
Against the Canadian military? The one that's suffering brutal attrition for their fourth-generation air force because half of it is being cannibalized to keep the other half remotely airworthy?
The one that has little, if any, automated units within its branches?
Naw dude, the leafs' military is literal shit.

>>33971490
Lots of people sell them on the EE most are NOS metal
("New old stock" basically unused surplus armorer parts) with brand new wood.

>>33961374
My dad renewed his without a membership im bc.

File: freeshrugs.jpg (84KB, 600x857px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 600x857px

>>33961456
>>33961498
>>33961559
The only two legitimate reasons for having Restricted is sports shooting and collecting. Obviously you can only shoot Restricted at an approved range. However, the Firearms Act does not require you to be a member of a range to purchase or own Restricted firearms.

It is in every Provincial CFO's purview to interpret the bit about the purpose of ownership how they see fit. Some CFO's will ask for a range membership during the transfer process as proof of your intention to do sports shooting at the range with it. Some CFO's will not.

Ontario CFO is well known for not requesting a range membership as part of the Restricted transfer. While that may change at any point, this has been the case for many years and is common knowledge.

File: IMG_0623.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

SOON
>Dewat Mk.II Longbranch I'm gonna bring back from the dead

>>33971490
Got mine from Liberty Tree Colllectors

File: IMG_4337.jpg (2MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2448x3264px

>>33970370
Show your paint job Homo.

>>33972551
you can restore dewats?

File: RCMP.png (268KB, 476x532px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 476x532px

>>33972551

>>33972591
I grabbed a bunch of parts from them, but their forends are listed as shipping to buyers in the USA only.

>>33972681
Yes and no, most Stens are on the prohib list. I suspect CTG is just going to make a machine gun anyway.
However there is one model that is allowed. People take dewats and use them as parts kits to convert them to closed bolt semi autos.
Not sure if this is still legal no way for me to check the FRT to see if the NR/R entries still exist for these type of sten.

>>33961559
>>33961522
In BC, You can get your RPAL without range membership. But you need a range membership if you ever want to shoot your restricted guns.

>CFAT date booked
Be honest, buds, how big of a mistake am I making?

>>33972875
Depends on what trade you're going into.

>>33972904
I put Armour, Infantry, and Artillery. Preferably armour.

>>33972870

I needed a range membership to acquire my restricted guns. Or at least, the CFO wanted to know which club I belonged to. Maybe it would have been approved either way.

But no, of course I got my RPAL before joining a club/range.

>>33972551
Guy at my range has 9, thats right 9 dewat Sterlings he has legally brought back from the dead.

>>33972681
Older dewars, yes. Depends on the individual piece. New dewars are too badly fucked up to fix.
>>33972761
Ah, the SaskSten. Nah, I'm just gonna crack the welds, replace any necessary parts, and get her running.

>>33973002
Not saying I would do any different. Too bad its a bitch to find the closed bolt parts these days.

>>33973026
I think I'll just keep it original. Might fab up a new wire stock/pistol grip combo, maybe get a second barrel shroud and put a pair of rails on for a veg and mini red dot,but that's just for fun, and could be swapped out in seconds.

>>33973342
>Red dot site on a Sten
>R6Siege.jpg

>>33973386
Thankfully if I wanted to go back to the original, the shroud just unscrews and the old stock just pops back on.

File: maxresdefault[1].jpg (99KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1280x720px

>>33973412
I could dig it though.

>>33973386
Its a Sterling in R6S

>>33973491
Oddly enough if you wanted a sterling the Mark 6 Police is legal here as well. Last time I saw one for sale it went for something around 6.4k

>>33973433
My concern is mostly that there's really no easy way to get your support hand on the gun. Up front is very little room, and the risk of catching your pinky in the ejection port/bolt, the charging handle will hit your fingers farther back, and grabbing it by the mag causes feed problems. So a VFG/custom stock would not only be comfier, but safer. Red dot is just for fun, the sights are surprisingly good.

>>33973612
You could always do the classic move of wrapping it in a leather sheath.

>>33961367
In BC if you join a gun club, a lot of their memberships come with ATT for ranges/transport. They probably have something similar in Alberta, ask around.

File: M14-in-action-3-vietnam.jpg (500KB, 770x534px) Image search: [Google]

500KB, 770x534px

Redpill me on the Norinco M305

I have been suppressing the desire to ruin my poorfag student wallet for satisfying my vietnam-war fetish fantasy, but now I might have some spare beaverbux after a summer BMQ. I want it to be as close to a legit M14 (minus the fun switch of course) as possible. (full length barrel and whatnot)

Where is the cheapest to get one?

Pro/Con, tell me all about it please!

File: 1490938415539.png (270KB, 476x532px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 476x532px

>>33959172

>>33973692
To clarify, I belong to Silvercore, they have it. $30 a year

>>33973002
Sasksten? Any idea what happened to the. I did some looking around just seemed to evaporated.
Also where might one find saskstens these days?

>>33973826
Legal troubles, probably went bankrupt because of it.

>>33973760

wife got me one for Christmas last year, so far Ive only put one box of ammo through it.

It didnt jam but like I said, Ive only fired 20 rounds
The last round in the mag wouldnt chamber and just fell out of the gun, I am assuming this is a mag problem and bought a second mag but I havent tried it yet.
I noticed the front sight was cocked slighly to the right, while reading about how to fix it I learned this may be due to an under torqued barrel and I intend to take it to a gun smith to get it fixed.


I guess its not to bad assuming it doesnt cost much to get the barrel torqued, the only reason I havent done it yet is because Ive been spending 200$ a month on 9mm since january and I try not to go over 200$ a month on firearms related stuff.

>>33973801
>>33972682
I feel like RCMP meme image comes up a lot in /k/anada general threads now

>>33973760
They aren't bad guns, although the prices are creeping upwards. You can put a bunch of money into them depending how autistic you want to be.

Get a nice Boyds wood stock and fiberglass brown upper handgaurd for maximum aesthetics though

>>33974055

I feel like the RCMP is doing a lot of fishing in /k/anada general threads now

>>33974055
because its dank and appropriate

File: Tok.png (189KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 480x480px

>>33974055
>He doesn't make his own
Freeze in the dark you eastern bastard

>>33974101

I wish there were more ATF memes converted to RCMP

>>33974108
Well I created somewhat of a template with >>33972682 using atf+reverse >>33959186 so have at it.

make the dank memes you want to see in the world.

>>33974096
>>33974101
>>33974104
Not complaining, I like RCMP-ATF memes

Doubly so if it pisses CTG and Moleman

>>33972761
>However there is one model that is allowed. People take dewats and use them as parts kits to convert them to closed bolt semi autos.
Neat.
>>33973002
>New dewars are too badly fucked up to fix
That is what I thought. I guess alot of dewats would be quite complicated to restore, but a sten is ultra simple so it can't be that hard right?

>>33974355
New dewats are usually just a giant blunderfuck of slash-and-burn welding and cutting inside. Old dewats are usually just things like pins and tack welds. They're usually more valuable for it, too.

I wonder if we will ever be able to get Polytech Type 03s.

>>33973433
>rails on a sten
>red dot on a sten
Dig Tom Clancy up and kill him again for inspiring this

File: type 03.jpg (134KB, 1382x697px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 1382x697px

>>33974617
Aren't they just modernized Type-81's?

>>33974668
That's not a Sten you dense nigger

File: hr43gfd.png (365KB, 429x382px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 429x382px

>>33974668
>thinking it's a sten
even it it was a sten
>implying anything of value would be lost

>>33973760

I've run just shy of 500 rds through my norinco m305. Only had one failure to eject during that whole time. Can't speak as to accuracy as I'm certainly not a crack shot.

>>33971539
against civilian raiders or genocidal ideologues, again with $30 flying grenades, attrition and the same or better firearms

the guy's a commie retard

>>33964680
Dont fucking come back you hear,
This site is nice but it is awful.

>>33974961
>>33974780
>n-not a sten
>don't actually identify what firearm it actually is
>BECAUSE IT'S A FUCKING STEN
Head back to CGN anytime, NDP voters.

Anybody know of where I can find a Gen 2 P320? Everywhere I look they just have pictures of the Gen 1s.

>>33976573
See>>33973491

>>33976573
As if CGN is any friendlier to dippers.

>>33969040

Are you that skeletor kid i saw on saturday in a blue shirt going through every single sks in the store? He was explaining matching serial numbers to a couple older people. I assumed he was a /k/unt.

Do any of you guys have experience with Tenda Canada out in Richmond Hill?

File: 539eb362-ecb8-4a13-a4e6-1206eddecefb_JDX-2x1_WEB.jpg (84KB, 1200x495px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1200x495px

>>33979441
>tfw going to start a new thread without a retarded image
>4chan keeps thinking it's spam
>this thread gets bumped while I'm screwing around with that
Fuck it, doesn't matter anyway... what does matter is there was an important message from Maxime Bernier's campaign that I figured it would be best to share, since it seems Tories can't into voting.

>By our count, nearly one in five people has incorrectly filled out their ballot.
>That means thousands of votes won't count — and it means if you haven't voted, your vote is more important than ever.
>You must include a photocopied piece of ID with your address with your ballot.
>If you did not include a piece of ID with your ballot, your vote will not count.
>If your ID did not include an address, or is not on the approved list of ID, your vote will not count
>Here's the good news — you may be able to recast your ballot, but you MUST request a new ballot today by 5PM.
>Call the Conservative Party or email them at [email protected] to request a new ballot if you believe you forgot to include ID.


>tfw I'm trying to remember if I stuffed everything in the secrecy ballot, or did it properly.

>>33976439
implying I can
>remember, you're here forever

>>33979543
bunch of china mans in a small shop with occasional good deals.

they'll price match some items some of the time.

I like them.

File: 2017-04-15 19.55.18.jpg (968KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

968KB, 1080x1920px

>>33979441
Holy fuck that actually was me

File: sksscout.png (362KB, 700x456px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 700x456px

Thoughts on a build like this? Too much autism or still relatively tasteful?

>>33960808
>i have around 40 guns
I've seen your gun safe you liar.

>>33979728
Gross. Just buy a vz58 if you want to tacticool

>>33979728
I've heard tapco stock is not as good as the ati, also ati one folds and seemingly has more sensible grip angle (although that's more of to each their own situation). maybe look into that and compare.

>>33979543
what >>33979585 said
was in the area on business so dropped by there once to check it out. it's basically a chinese corner store with guns and ammo instead of groceries, but that's not a bad thing.
people don't look at you like you just asked to ass-fuck their daughter when you ask to check out guns; will put the extra effort into showing you a few examples if you're looking at milsurp
>saw a kid there with his friend buying his first SKS, looked autistic enough to actually be a fellow /k/ommando, and they treated him well
and of course, like in any respectable chinese corner store, you are welcome to try and haggle, if you're spending a decent bit of money and buying a few things, they'll knock off a few bucks
>again, the friend and his kid, I think his buddy got him a deal on a combo of rifle + ammo or something like that

generally they are most known for regularly having great sales on ammo

>>33979728
Disgusting

>>33957405
Any one know of a good anti tank rifle I can get? price is not an issue. I was thinking the PTRD

>>33980193
>the friend and his kid
the kid and his friend, damn it

>>33980293
These are most of the ones I know about being available in some way shape or form.
PTRS .50Cal soviet
PTRD .50Cal soviet
Zastava M93 .50Cal soviet
Boys AT .55 Boys or .50bmg
Solothurn AT 20mm
Azino 20mm
AR-50 A1 .50bmg
Barrett M99 .50bmg
Styer HS-50M1 .50bmg
GM6 Lynx .50bmg
And a few more budget single shot .50bmg

>>33980499
PTRS has the most Aesthetics for me cant find any online and I would feel autistic going into LGS asking for a PTRS.

>>33980514
You'll most likely have to import one from the states, they are a bitch to find here.

>>33980549
Yeah but some how they are unrestricted cant wait to fire it semi auto on my property scaring everyone cause of my private range haha.

>>33980586
Oh god I can only imagine the soccer moms driving little timmy to practise when all the of the sudden "BOOM" "BOOM" "BOOM" "BOOM" "BOOM" Hahaha.

File: 20170510_213110-1.jpg (1MB, 1965x2544px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1965x2544px

I have a few restricted guns for sale, fellow Canadians.

BRAND NEW IWI baby eagle 9mm "S" model (threaded barrel) 3 mags, holster, mag holders. $750 shipped

BRAND NEW Rock Island Armoury 1911 .45 ACP stainless w/5 mags. $750 shipped.

BRAND NEW Glock 19 threaded barrel, 2 mags, case, papers, etc. $775 shipped.

lightly used (300 rds fired) Glock 17, 2 mags. excellent condition. $650 shipped.

for pics and details email me at [email protected]

>>33979682
You are the worst kind of person.

>>33979682
Are you a gril? Wtf is up with that eyeliner

>>33979543

An avid shooter at work recommended them to me and I imagine a guy that shoots as much as he does knows his shit.

I went there looking for P-09 mags but alas, I have yet to find any in Canada

File: 20170513_144911.jpg (4MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 5312x2988px

>>33980754
Why? I was looking for a '49 sks and they literally had none
>>33980788
Nope.
I was tired and took the picture with my shitty phone camera.

>>33979682

Shit, well thats kind of neat. I never thought i would see a kommando in real life.

Did you end up finding one you liked?

>>33980788
it's a weponized Thai ladyboy, duh
>forgetting which board you are on

>>33980838
Am i the only one who wants to come deep into one of those lady boys?

>>33980832
>>33980828

>>33980123
Well yeah, obviously. That's like telling someone with a modded civic to go and buy a lambo.

>>33980898
Not really. You'd spend just as much ricing that Sks as you would on a new vz

File: sadpeep.png (51KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 657x527px

>>33980200
>>33980123
Really? It's that bad? Well fug ok then...

>>33980942
SKS is fine as it is anon. if you like it like that keep itt but really it looks fuddy as hell.

>>33980931
I'm the original guy that posted the pic.
What planet do you live on? An sks with a tapco stock and a red dot would run me like $500. A new Vz is upwards of 1.3k last I checked

File: FB_IMG_1480791254301.jpg (61KB, 960x539px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 960x539px

>>33980101
Here like 20

>>33980732
Why do you have four brand new pistols? Also,
>I need a Jericho in my life but I'm too poor
Someday.

>>33980549
Theyre destructive devices in the us you wouldnt be able to get one and import it

What gun can I legally own that will trigger antis the most?

>>33981449
Didn't realize the russian 50cal was ever so slightly over the US dd limit.

>>33981520
"how do I make myself look like an autist and discredit legal gun owners even more"

stop being a nigger

>>33981560
The PTRS and PTRD are 14.5mm, not .50.

>>33979552
>tfw going to start a new thread without a retarded image

I like the retarded image, it helps our threads stand out and reminds us who we are trying to defeat.

>>33981580
Fug im tired got it confused with DShK rounds which are .511

>>33981572
>discrediting legal gun owners by owning a legal gun

???

Jesus fucking christ why is everyone on CGN a fudd or an autist with a bubba'd SKS

I literally just want to buy an enfield from a fuckwit on the exchange and never go back

New thread

>>33981634
>>33981634
>>33981634

File: mcr-040-660x367.gif (70KB, 660x367px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 660x367px

>>33981520
This and a trench coat.
https://www.wolverinesupplies.com/ProductDetail/FIGMCR013_-FightLite-MCR-013-Semi-Auto-5-56-Nato-16-25--Quick-Change-Barrel-Dual-Feed-Mil-Std-1913-Rail-?sortValue=0

>>33981430
20 is literally half of 40.

>>33980942
don't listen to them, it's fine

this one >>33980957 doesn't even know what the term "fudd" actually means. you are thinking of "bubba", genius. a fudd would never remove wood from a gun to put polymer on it, that's fudd sacrilege.

it's not some battle-weathered heirloom rifle that has character and history, gone through a world war or two and the like. the SKS you are buying here is a mass produced post-war peasant rifle that may have seen a few untrained farmers in the national guard point and shoot it at the side of the barn or some unlucky conscripts that didn't get an AK fingerfuck it for a year or two. it's rough, ugly and reliable, like Soviet tractor. make it work for you however you like: like the wood, keep the wood, want to tacticool it, go fuckig crazy.
the only thing is make sure that if you are removing the original mag, the replacements are just as reliable (more often than not, keeping the fixed mag is the safest choice for reliability)

>>33982291
Im just pretending to be retarded.

>>33967285
I might give them a shot, I'll post again if I do about what I think