Guys why the fuck is there even a dust cover on an AK-47
>>33949195
To protect the gun's internals from your awful posts
>built by shitfaced drunk communists
>can be bathed in a mud puddle and then dropped in sand
>still fires and cycles just fine
>even if sealed with superglue
>>33949195
>keeps dust away by providing cover for the internals from dust.
Probably there to protect the user's face from the sand flying out.
In Soviet Russia, gun protect you from elements. Unless forget dust cover, then gun harms you with elements.
Despite the AK's legendary reliability, letting sand, dirt, twigs, and mud find their way into the receiver isn't going to do it any favors for reliability or maintenence.
>>33949195
Are you referring to the top cover or the selector switch?
>>33949209
Except for Ian and Karl's wheel barrow mud
>>33949209
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DX73uXs3xGU
>>33949195
Were you not able to find a slightly smaller picture? Don't worry, I got a better version for you.
>>33950342
I love forgotten weapons but they get pretty autistic here. No one unironically thought aks would fire no matter what and reliability doesn't just mean a mud bath.
>>33950537
people literally say an AK would work just fine if buried in mud though like >>33949209
from what i've seen AKs also fare pretty bad in fine sand tests
To cover it from dust.
>>33949195
To cover it from dust