Current Strong Europe Tank Challenge 2017 scores. >USA USA USA!

>>33928283
>Ukraine
Hhahahahah no wonder they're losing against poorly trained mercenaries

>>33928283
>Strong EUROPE Tank Challenge
>Ukraine
>USA

>>33928385
I suppose the Russian army does qualify as poorly trained mercenaries.

>>33928385
And we had an vatnik unironically telling everyone how they will win and how that directly means Russia would win if they participated.

>>33928460
>russian tanks
they break down during parades lmao they wouldn't last the 2 day competition

File: data=RfCSdfNZ0LFPrHSm0ublXdzhdrDFhtmHhN1u-gM,mVekmJhRt14GDwvOinvDCJilRt3lYmlzgMjnpIdRJwOP0wMd8ufxmBVGnX8e-RntDmQd11jujSPP94F2YK33H6Izly5pxIMfFj5VkkO9ppgWEAurHQ.png (62KB, 632x328px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 632x328px

>>33928409
Ukraine is in the europe ...

and for usa might as well be

pick related, usa will unironically defend this

>>33928283
Are these the final scores?

If so, source? I'd hope so, since the US got fucking btfo'd last year.

File: IMG_1691.jpg (238KB, 2048x1298px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 2048x1298px

>>33928409
>NATO and partner nations

File: _NIC2514.jpg (41KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 1000x664px

>>33928409
>Strong EUROPE Tank Challenge
>USA

The USA has only slightly less troops stationed in Europe than that Belgium has in its entire army.

The US also literally has more tanks in Europe than Belgium has in its entire inventory.

>>33928574
Being present in large numbers doesn't make you European, much like refugees

File: IMG_1694.jpg (368KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

368KB, 1600x1200px

>>33928543
The Bundesheer's facebook, and no it is not the final scores.

File: sexual.jpg (70KB, 530x768px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 530x768px

Long life to Latvia!

File: IMG_1693.jpg (416KB, 2048x1356px) Image search: [Google]

416KB, 2048x1356px

>>33928592
Your autistic fixation on the name of a NATO hosted event is impressive.

>>33928592
>Being present in large numbers doesn't make you European, much like refugees

It doesn't say it's the European Tank Challenge, it says it's the Europe Tank Challenge. Europe is a geographical place, in which there are about 40000 members of the US Armed Forces.

>>33928543
no tomorrow is the final day of the competition

>>33928610
>back to gorgeous woodland camo

Woodland camo on tanks is the best camo

File: IMG_1695.jpg (312KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 1600x1200px

>>33928701
By woodland you mean solid green.

>>33928686
fucking rekt

>>33928686
No, it says Strong Europe Tank Challenge where Strong Europe is the name of the mission, not the location itself.
Just a small correction

>>33928711
Well, minus the tan commander's weapon station.

File: file.png (2MB, 1353x765px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1353x765px

>>33928555
>>33928610
>>33928631
>>33928711
wen need more OD Abrams with sand color CROWS

File: IMG_1692.jpg (463KB, 2048x1356px) Image search: [Google]

463KB, 2048x1356px

>>33928724
>>33928727
When you start looking you realize there are a lot of tan bits left.

>>33928727
lol fuck that's a bit too glossy\shiny

Is that US standards now?

>>33928795
Never seen a tank in the rain before?

>>33928795
It's wet you dumbass. Cant you see how wet is the dirt on the ground?

>>33928832
>>33928857
Are you telling me the US military doesn't use fucking paint coating which removes the glossyness of rain on metal?

>>33928918
What?

>>33928543
No, and it also says the number of completed tasks may vary. So the score doesn't even represent some mid-competition result.
I wouldn't give too much on the standings. Last years the Italians led the score after day 1 but came in 4th after day 2.

>>33928918
>paint coating which removes the glossyness of rain on metal?
Does such a thing even exist? The gloss comes from the water, short of keeping the surface dry I don't think that's possible.

>>33928986
>Does such a thing even exist?
Yes, it's used by the British Army on their Challenger 2's and the Bundeswehr with their Leopard 2's.

Surely that one picture is just a fuckup on the engineers part, since the CROWS is still in Tan. I imagine they haven't fully finished the coating yet. But if the US literally doesn't have the ability to remove the shine from their wet tanks, jesus fuck.

I tried to upload an image of a Challenger 2 in the rain, but it exceeded the 4MB limit. So I'll post a link instead.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ea/A_Challenger_2_Main_Battle_Tank_from_the_Royal_Dragoon_Guards_MOD_45149718.jpg

>>33928986
Yeah. Ever see a wet humvee? The CARC paint used on [literally everything the US military has] is very grainy and textured. This provides a bunch of benefits, one of which is making wet things not shiny/reflective.
>the downside is once a thing gets dirty it requires a pressure washer and a lot of time to get it actually clean again

>>33928753
I wouldn't consider a fucking water jug or a fistful of assault packs in the bustle part of the tank.

The smoke launcher cover is, I think, just fucking dirty. Not really sure what color it's supposed to be though. Also, it's a removable nylon-canvas sack.

File: 1487418842580.jpg (55KB, 258x360px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 258x360px

>>33928832
>>33928857
>>33928946
>>33928986
>US Army so fucking third world tier that they literally use the same standards that other nations used in WW2

Fucking kek you can't make this shit up. And americans wonder why people make fun of their military, holy shit.

And they call the Russian military a joke.

>>33928753
So fucking weird seeing an Abrams not in that typical tan color

>>33928283
Germany won last year and the competition isn't over yet.

>>33929064
Look at the hull front.

>>33929032
The green paint is a temporary job by the crews, apparently it can be removed with a pressure hose.

I don't know if it applies in this case but the US Army has been buying paint that reduces thermal signature.

>>33929155
Unless I'm missing anything, the only thing that's tan is the painted on identifying number in the right corner.

>>33928409
>when the euros think theyre not literally owned by the US

cute, but we decide when and where our tanks compete. and yours for that matter lmao

>>33929189
>americans thinking they're relevant

more news at 10

>>33929082
I hate Europeans so god damn much. Call us when you need bailed out of a third world war and shut the fuck up.

File: 1489205293833.png (654KB, 692x600px) Image search: [Google]

654KB, 692x600px

>>33929239

>>33929239
cute

now tell me you could leave NATO if you wanted to

This thread is why /k/ needs flags

>>33929082
Are you ok?

>>33929172
The belly and roadwheels.

File: did someone say shitposting.png (38KB, 185x233px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 185x233px

>>33929365
I honestly wonder how many of them would be Australian.

>>33928385
>poorly trained mercenaries

Ivan plz

>>33929264
>Call us when you need bailed out of a third world war and shut the fuck up.

Funny, how literally every recent war the US has been in, they've begged other countries, mainly European, to help out.

your nation's armed forces is useless, americuck

>>33928527
Uh, defend what exactly? The layout of Europe?
Or did you post the wrong picture?

>>33929636
We have never begged. You cunts used it as a cheap excuse to get some combat experience.

Also quit trying to ignore the fact that Europe is no longer relevant because you guys pissed away your colonies in those two World Wars and had to make the "EU; Super Best Friends Club" to even still be relevant on the international stage...which btw how is that little club working out for you guys?

>>33929636
Crazy how a brief look at the numbers show European forces are so minute in these conflicts as to... dare I say... be there solely so that the action isn't deemed unilateral by the UN.

Are all yurpeens this dumb or is it only this guy? Genuine question.

>>33929701
>>33929742
>americucks denial

How's that superiority complex working out for you, jamel and tyrone

>>33929810
How's the Muslim cock working for you Rasheed?

>>33929502
Its 2-4am in straya, all the sick cunts are tucked up in bed dreaming of spiders.

>>33929817
Wouldn't know, because my country isn't full of niggers, spics, or muslims, tyrone :^)

Sort out your own problem before you shit talk, mister 60%.

>>33929742
Don't worry amerifriend, it's only this guy

>>33930232
Your country isn't full of blacks and hispanics, but it is full of muslims and that population is growing rapidly.

>yfw that 60% is at minimum twice as many as any other country

>>33929693
He meant the US will literally defend those lands with it's military, NATO and such.

>>33929636
Technically its just for company. The US military still amounts for over 75% of all allied sorties in operations globally. The UK provides most of the rest.

>>33929810
>>33930232
But the percentage of black people in the US is only 1% higher than it was 100 years ago.

The percentage of blacks is stable.

The decreasing proportion of whites is coming from the increase in the Hispanic and Asian population.

File: 17309510_1003462689787661_6978865024078837928_n.jpg (94KB, 654x960px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 654x960px

>>33929896
Not this sick cunt

>>33928283

>USA places third in a contest for EUROPEANS

Just imagine if it were Strong American Tank Challenge, yurocuckolds wouldn't stand a chance.

>>33930710
Work on your reading skills.

>>33930444
>whites in the US is estimated to go to 45% by 2020

Your nation is doomed

>>33928574
Belgium is a non-country though

>>33930930
Thankfully Hillary lost and we are not importing the tens of millions necessary to get a 15% population shift in 3 years.

Europe on the other hand...

>>33931421
?
The USA already has a 15%+ population shift just by the age gap of people already here
Nothing has changed in regards to mass immigration yet, the illegals are still in the US having their anchor babies

File: IMG_1687.jpg (536KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

536KB, 2048x1536px

>>33931491
>immigration already dropping off sharply
>second and third generation immigrants have a sharp dropoff in birthrate
>this will cause a 15% shift in 3 years

Anyway, back to the thread topic.

https://youtu.be/0EkNXb_Q73c
https://youtu.be/0dDGe0Y0Tsk

>>33930654
Gone for a year and /k/ is still easily baited. Stop replying to that anons bait, even though I hate /k/s own version of bait with bong posting.