I have the impression the sherman is a little taller than the tiger.
Why did they rate the Tiger as a heavy tank and the sherman as a light tank?
>>33913541
Jesus, what a shitty post.
Because the tiger is heavier?
Do you not see that the tiger is like 1.5 times as wide?
Armor thickness, weight, gun, and most importantly tactical usage.
>>33913541
>Heavy and light cavalry are both just a guy riding a horse, I don't see the difference.
not even worth a (You)
>>33913541
I have the impression the sherman is a little taller than the Abrams.
Why did they rate the Abrams as an MBT and the sherman as a light tank?
>>33913541
Sherman wasn't a light tank.
That is not a Tiger in your picture.
>>33914869
its a Tiger II you moron.
>>33914886
>Wow, a completely different tank!
>>33914918
It´s not that different. Same chassis and same engine/tracks, same calibre gun, ridiculously overweight. And, most importantly, it was called Tiger, so I´d say it is a Tiger.
>>33914886
It's a panther, not a tiger
>>33915893
Look at the turret front of this Panther and compare it to the tank in OP's image.
>>33914918
But that's wrong. They're both the Panzerkampfwagen VI. That would be like saying the M4 and M4A3E8 are different tanks.
>>33913541
American tanks are just sterotypes of the ameriburger way of life.
>fat
>retarded
>dick is extremely small and couldn't penetrate tissue paper let alone a tight extra thicc tiger's well polished ass
>once penetrated immediately shits itself and starts cumming EVERYWHERE
>>33916348
>posted from my panther as HE from a medium velocity 75 shatters my turret
>>33916375
Oh Jesus, imagine the spalling inside.
>>33916375
if you want to investigate how good he was at opening up tanks, search up what the isu-152 and kv-2 did to german kitties with their he shells.
isu-152 could knock the turret right off tigers
>>33914964
Still though, the Tiger II had a longer gun. And are you high? The hull is completely different, and last I checked, the chassis is gonna be part of the hull in a tank.
>>33916375
>>33917763
>>33914964
>Tiger II
>same chassis as Tiger 1
no
>Same gun as Tiger 1
no
>>33917763
At Kursk the 152s were just about the only thing that could hold up against the Ferdis.