Are there any concealable 380s that use dubble stack magazines

Beretta Cheetah, model 84 I believe.
It's pretty awesome

Why the fuck would you want a double stack .380 when 9mm takes up the same amount of space as .380?

>>33894740

beretta has some really nice 380 double stacks but they cost about $700 new

bersa has some shit that costs about $400 but you might as well buy 3 of them and after 500rds maybe 1 of them will still work

>>33894747
Beat me to it.
Bersa thunder+ too.

>>33894740
Fuck double stack. Get a ppk and get gud at reloads.
Human life is short. Aesthetic is eternal

>>33894747
Looks like a really cool gun but its almsot seven inches long, and five inches high is more of a full sized gun for my frame at least.

>>33894751
Bersa really that poorly made? I've been considering buying one.

cz83 (or surplus 82s in 380)

File: IMG_1895.jpg (82KB, 680x907px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 680x907px

>>33894750
I shoot better with a 380. Mostly because its lighter on the recoil. i can fire off multiple rounds very quickly and accurately with a 380. Then i can with a 9mm.

>>33894740
Bersa thunder .380 plus
Its a tad bulky, but def conceivable

>>33894881

well the double stack i bought was crap, trip to factory gs, still not fixed, mag ejects when firing, slide stop won't work etc

the single stacks get lots of good reviews but i'm never buying another bersa....

i rented some rugers last week their sr9c is awesome

>>33894750
Lighter recoil means it gives better followup shots even though it's smaller.

It's why I carry 9x18 makarov.
It's also why I'm in the market for a summer piece in .32 ACP.

>>33894904
>>33894979
This is because you suck balls.
>this is why I use a .22lr!!1

>>33894740
Just get a Glock 25

>>33894897
i was going to say this.

>>33894881

Bersa is Taurus & Kek-Tec tier.

50% chance of it either being decent or total shit.

>>33894897

This if you NEED a double stack or a surplus Beretta Cheeta

Otherwise, Glock 42 or Beretta 1934 or FN 1910