Post the guns that everyone says is ugly yet you think looks great.
>>33870376
>suggesting that the CZ 75 Tactical Sport could possibly considered ugly by even a single person
reeeeeeeeee
It's a shame it'll never leave best korea
>>33870437
what grenade launcher is that?
>>33870446
>>33870468
10/10
>>33870414
could be the bright aluminum grip which some find gaudy. i'm kind of half-and-half on them. part of me wants one for my PCR
>>33870376
The only thing Ugly about the CZ tactical sport/orange is how fuck huge the grip is. I really wanted one for my competition gun but I can't hold it nearly as well as I can a STI 2011.
>>33870376
I've never heard anyone calling a match grade CZ ugly.
>>33870376
I like the color contrast, and am a fan of that orange, but it looks a bit bright /shiny.
Unrelated, but the gun reminded me of today.
>finally decide to go from nogunz to hasgunz today
>buy an SP-01
>guy casually tries to upsell me to a Shadow
I'm in sales, and to see him do that made me internally kek.
>>33870376
Looks even better polished
>>33871993
How much was the Shadow? Also I know you're new to guns but once you get into the hobby and you try to squeeze all of the performance out of a 9mm bullet then you will understand. Trust me on this, you decided on a special snowflake CZ, and he probably thought you were buying it for competition which a Shadow would have been a wise choice. IF you were to buy a Glock 19 he wouldn't upsale you unless maybe to a Glock 19 Gen 4.
>>33873118
I didn't even inquire because it wasn't on the floor. I can't deal with that, and I was in work mode, so I reverted back into my shell pretty hard but not hard enough to see what he was implying.
I also bought that one because it looked hella cool, IMO and /k/'s thread on all metal guns seemed to imply it was a good gun. This then got me checking around for various video, magazine, and forum reviews on it. From this gathered anecdotal evidence it seemed like a good gun, and the aesthetics made me want it more. Also, is it really a special snowflake? I am genuinely curious. I paid 650, which was a 30% to 50% increase over most other 9mm pistols they had. But it wasn't like I dropped 1,100 to 1,200 dollary-doos on some of the others they had. I also have never liked how Glock's look, if they didn't look so... I dunno, basic? To me, I would have probably gotten one of those instead. I was also thinking of getting a USP instead, but ultimately went for the CZ.
>>33870414
I'm not really a fan. Maybe not "ugly", but not cute either.
>>33873262
>wasn't in work mode*
>>33870653
Never understood the appeal of this gun.
The window is cool and all but aside from that...
>>33873315
https://youtu.be/4trmOFxuJw0
>>33870414
Fuck this gay earth. I come to /k/ for weapons, not to catch feelings and lament my existence.
Please keep in mind before you bully me that this thread is about looks and not reliability/effectiveness.
>>33874379
You're lucky it's not, or I'd bully you a whole lot for your choice, senpai.
>>33874408
Hell, compared to the Type 94 the Type 14 looks better and is far more reliable.
I know that's not exactly a high standard but still, it could be a lot worse.
>>33874433
Where do you live where this has ever been said? Do you come from some alternative timeline or something?
I want something literally just a body kit over a more modern rifle's internals. STG takes the cake for me in terms of looks, but I know for a fact that it is easily outclassed by more or less any decent rifle made in the past 50 years.
>>33870468
New reaction image
>>33870446
Its a helical AK74 drum magazine, ya dangus
>>33870653
where to buy?