How modern can you make a flintlock musket? What improvements

why the fuck would you want that

>>33868850
It's not called the Bill of Needs

>>33868801
>coil springs
>different materials/treatment

>>33868801
not make it a flintlock

File: image.jpg (157KB, 660x495px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 660x495px

>>33868801
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UVw0Un3hgU
According to California,!New York and whatever commie state law, this is an Assault Weapon

File: 1490209622155.jpg (131KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 1920x1080px

>>33868870
>why the fuck would you want that
>It's not called the Bill of Needs
He said want, not need you fucking retard

>>33868801
Well, you should look at the Ferguson Rifle, for one. And then take a look at the Cookson Volitional repeater.
Honestly, beyond those two, there isn't a whole ton of improvements I can think of that don't rely on getting rid of the flintlock at least, and most likely, going with some sort of contained cartridge, thus defeating the point of your post.

TL;DR:
Flintlock tech peaked with the Ferguson and Cookson repeater rifles.

>>33869204
No it's not because it doesn't take at detachable mag or is semi-auto
at least in NY

>>33868801

Are we talking taking an old musket and modifying it, or a blank slate of flintlock design with modern technology?

File: 1493645569460.png (317KB, 600x1000px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 600x1000px

>>33868801