who would win?
>>33857079
Lol they actually bought that shit?
It's not a Main Battle Tank
The article writer is a retard
>>33857079
Literally a dressed up Anders light tank.
>>33857131
If they use the absolute latest ceramic materials it might actually be able to keep up with the older MBTs. The absolute best modern armor offers around 5x more protection per KG than what is in NATO tanks. The new ceramics no longer shatter from AP either.
Dont they have only 5 of them vs several thousand Abrams or T-whatever?
>>33857079
Polish tank, probably, going against an old M1.
>>33857079
It's not even an MBT.
>>33857851
>>33857805
>>33857724
>>33857219
>>33857131
>>33857099
It`s not even a prototype. It`s "concept" made by unsuccesfull company to try drain some more money on never-ending "programs".
fuck hasn't this thing been going on for like 15 years now?
>>33859143
to be fair, I dont think building a tank is a very fast thing to do. Esecially when your country isnt at war or has an immediate use for a new one.
>>33859088
so, a stryker then
I'd like to point out Poland once had the best cavalry in Europe too. Didn't keep them from getting shit stomped and carved up by the russians, austria-hungary, sweden, hre, etc. In typical polish fashion they'll fuck it up.
>>33859207
nah stryker is the most powerful wheeled vehicle of war produced. m900 is a better quality round than anything that any european country especially Germany has ever produced