What's the difference between the two, really?
Seem to be the same fucking shit.
Functionally they are the same, and they are used for practically the same purpose.
The only difference is that PDWs were specifically designed to be able to defeat body armor. SMGs are just pistol caliber machine guns.
>>33843171
SMGs were getting outdated so the pet jews of gun-firms everywhere have to find a hip & new way of marketing them.
smg is shit like 9mm or 10mm
pdw is 4.6x30 and 5.7x28
so essentially >>33843190
>>33843171
A couple million in marketing budget.
>>33843171
They're the bridge between SMGs & carbines. Compact guns that can reach out and punch through body armor.
SMGs are built around pistol caliber rounds, PDWs use specialty rounds made to give armor-penetrating velocities out of SMG-length barrels.
They're intended to replace or supplement handguns for personnel who either work in the back lines or are in vehicles, so small size, compactness, and good ergonomics are also prioritized in PDWs.
>>33843986
>>33843326
>>33843207
>>33843190
All wrong. The H&K MP5K-PDW is, as the name implies, a PDW in 9x19mm and it doesn't penetrate level 2 body armor. The PP-19, PP-90 and Vityaz SMGs both fire Russian overpressure rounds that defeats level 2 body armor, yet they still go under SMG and not PDW.
Like >>33843255 said, PDW basically a new marketing term to design a SMG.
>>33844050
But something like an M1 carbine often gets called a PDW nowadays. Seems like SMG is more of a physical designation (pistol-caliber full auto weapon, generally larger than a pistol), while PDW simply has to do with its intended role.
SMG is a type of firearm
PDW is the role a firearm plays
>>33844065
The M1 is no PDW as it lacks full-auto. The M2 could count as one. And what about all 7.62x25mm SMGs, like the PPSh-41 and PPS-43? They are all full-auto and 7.62x25mm defeats level 2 body armor. Are they SMGs or PDWs?
>>33844085
>The M1 is no PDW as it lacks full auto
Give me 1 (one) source that definitively states only full auto weapons can be described as "personal defense weapons"
>>33844050
You're right that's its a marketing term, but that doesn't mean it doesn't have a set definition. The MP5K PDW was specifically named as it was pushed out the door in a hurry to draw attention away from the newly unveiled P90, its still functionally an SMG. Names mean nothing to H&K, all their SMGs are considered machine pistols and the HK53 was marketed as an SMG. As for the Russian guns you mentioned, of course they are SMGs. They're still firing pistol rounds, them being hot loads doesn't change that.
>>33844102
The source is me. That's one source. Anyway, the term personal defense weapon is stupid - like assault weapons. Any weapon used for personal defense is a PDW. Homeland Security defines the M4 as a personal defense weapon, and an AR15 in civilian hands.
>>33844124
All H&K SMGs are called MP because in German you don't make a difference between SMG, machine pistol and PDW - they are all called Maschinenpistole (MP).
By the way, the East-Germans called the AK a machine pistol (MPi is an abbreviation for Maschinenpistole).
>>33843171
is it a modern SMG or super SBR that you see badass people doing cool shit with you'll never fuckin get close to doing in your pathetic life?
it's probably a PDW
Marketing. The term "PDW" has been applied to tons of different guns. From the original NATO request that led to the P90 and MP7, PDW just mean "gun" without saying the word "gun". They wanted a shoulder-fired PDW (smg/rifle/whatever) and held held PDW (pistol). The term PDW wasn't specific to any form factor.