Revolver General

File: Chapuis-Manurhin-MR73-Sport-5-1-4-1.jpg (41KB, 976x510px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 976x510px

there can only be one...

I cant choose between a .357 or .44,its only going to be a range toy.
Someone help me

File: mr732.jpg (131KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 640x427px

>>33834936
357, by far.

>>33834896
in the process of getting a ruger security six

can someone tell me something about it out of experience?

File: 20161114_223513-2.jpg (837KB, 2587x1836px) Image search: [Google]

837KB, 2587x1836px

>>33834931
no.

like, maybe if you posted a Korth.

but you didn't.

File: 20161117_205551-1.jpg (498KB, 2449x1819px) Image search: [Google]

498KB, 2449x1819px

>>33834977
its heavy but awesome and will outlive cockroaches

File: 1489773848380.jpg (381KB, 2376x1584px) Image search: [Google]

381KB, 2376x1584px

>>33835041
>Korth
like every piece of germ-trash, totally over rated and doesn't deliver. and I say that as an ethnic german.

Should I go with 357 or 44 for my innawoods gun? What model?

>>33834936
.357 Magnum

File: ruger_super_bh_rib.jpg (45KB, 567x425px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 567x425px

I have always owned automatics but have felt the draw towards a magnum revolver lately. I've got some questions:

1. What's with the circle jerk on Manurhin and why are they better?

2. Pros and cons of .327 / .357 / .41 / .44 Magnum?

3. Which revolvers hold the most aesthetic? Mateba need not apply.

4. Is Ruger utter shit?

>>33835057
thats awesome thank you anon

>>33835064
korth is awesome

ive shot quite a few revolvers and korths have a wonderful trigger and the best fit and finish of all revolvers you can find

>>33835174
>4. Is Ruger utter shit?

No, in fact the GP100 is one of the best .357 revolvers you can get today.

File: 2017-05-02 12.56.35.jpg (1MB, 2121x3771px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2121x3771px

>>33834896

File: 20161117_210520-1.jpg (343KB, 1836x1431px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 1836x1431px

>>33835083
357 or 327 anywhere that doesnt have grizzly or polar bears. But 357 is more widely availble and you can shoot 38spl out of it

any Ruger model, mostly sp/gp/ or security six, but also their single actions

>>33835187
here is a pic of my sp101 and a charter arms too

I have/had a .22lr double action/single action 8 shot revolver that i loved. my grandpa moved out recently and asked if he could use a gun for self protection. as much as i loved that gun i wanted to say no but my grandpas security means more

>>33835174
Mahurins are rare and, desite my ribbing the OP, pretty nicely made. They were the chosen sidearm of french special police.

Unfortunately we dont get a lot in the states and the last batch that came in was pretty beat up police trade ins, scalpers bought a lot of them, and the last one I saw on armslist had little finish left and was going for $850. You can buy a new stainless Smith 686 for that.

so quality and rarity make them desirable.

>>33835354
I'm digging the gp100 in 357, should I go for the 4 inch or 6inch barrel?

File: Sexy wheelgun.jpg (16KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 500x500px

>>33834896
Should I go Model 66 or Snub nose 686?

File: Manurhin MR73.jpg (383KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 1000x667px

>>33835174

File: mr73.jpg (130KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 640x427px

nothing can compete with this.

Are there any good companies who make kyrex revolver holsters? Also are Matebas just a meme?

>>33835781
>kyrex

File: wheelgun.jpg (3MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5312x2988px

I'm replacing the Leupold with a vortex venom because it's just too damn high and it's not particularly impressive for $500.

File: 17409500_10154915950699892_1952806378_n.jpg (119KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 640x640px

>>33834896
my qt

File: IMG_20170404_163558.jpg (2MB, 3706x1782px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3706x1782px

>>33834931
My melanin enriched gentleman

File: Manurhin-MR-73.jpg (83KB, 1489x1030px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 1489x1030px

>>33835827
Rick Grimes pls go.

>>33835187
Is mr73 on that list of "many"?

File: IMG_20170430_154734.jpg (3MB, 3882x2283px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3882x2283px

My $300 model 64

>>33835174
>4. Is Ruger utter shit?
Are you utterly retarded or just new to guns?

>>33835786
>autocorrect
Kydex.
Have any suggestions?

>>33835477
6inch only weighs a little more. Also you get better performance and a longer sight radius.

>>33835881
Alien Gear

File: Screenshot_20170502-150607.png (408KB, 800x1280px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 800x1280px

Really crushing on this super redhawk, cerakoted matte black. Seems kind of pricy though

>>33835174
>1. What's with the circle jerk on Manurhin and why are they better?
They go through a lot of testing and QC and are extremely robust. Every Manurhin has guaranteed accuracy and durability.

>2. Pros and cons of .327 / .357 / .41 / .44 Magnum?
Don't even bother with .327, or .41
.357 for general purpose, .44 for large animals

>3. Which revolvers hold the most aesthetic? Mateba need not apply.
Any PPC revolver

>4. Is Ruger utter shit?
No, they have pretty good price to performance.

Anyone have an Alfa Project in 357?Thinking of buying one as a first revolvo

>>33836545
Extremely poorly reviewed. I looked into them hard. No one imports them for a reason.

>>33836591
Theres a bunch in Canada,and I can buy one used in .357 for 400$ CAD which doesnt seem half bad.
What was bad about them?

>>33835041
Korth is better than Manurhin... But not twice the price better.

File: IMG_0741sm.jpg (915KB, 2061x1546px) Image search: [Google]

915KB, 2061x1546px

>>33835813
Go long distance or go home.

File: revolvers.jpg (764KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

764KB, 1920x1080px

>>33834896

File: Meatba.jpg (694KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

694KB, 1920x1080px

>>33837242

File: Meatba2.jpg (671KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

671KB, 1920x1080px

>>33837263

File: ACDSeePro10_2017-04-19_17-28-08.jpg (186KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 1920x1080px

>>33837272

File: 2017-03-26_20-23-18.jpg (194KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 1920x1080px

>>33837278

File: 2017-03-26_20-13-04.jpg (177KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 1920x1080px

>>33837308
>>33837263

File: MeatbaMflash02.jpg (242KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1920x1080px

>>33837321
Also, what's a revolver bread without some CYLINDER GAP

File: Smith_&_Wesson_Model_629_Stealth_Hunter.jpg (761KB, 3000x2038px) Image search: [Google]

761KB, 3000x2038px

Probably my favorite

File: DW715FBmuzzie.jpg (303KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 1920x1080px

>>33837322
>>33837334
Mmmmm Delicious Python

File: MR73.jpg (312KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 1920x1080px

>>33837343

>>33834976
>>33834949
>>33834931
Good taste detected

>>33836632
They are just poorly reviewed and are supposedly not very well finished. Google em.

S&w or ruger for my first wheelgun? Also, what are some good holsters?

>>33837420
>good holster

For what?

My grip is shit, are there any options in revolvers when you need a lighter trigger pull?

>>33837494
Search local gun forums

There's plenty of gunsmiths who can really improve you're trigger

>>33837480
Either a gp100 or a model 686

>>33837516
I mean revolvers that have lighter pull by design. Don't care if they're for women or something.

File: goatak.jpg (52KB, 750x750px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 750x750px

If I want a Double action revolver in .22 with MORE than 6 shots, what are my options?

File: IMG_0894.jpg (717KB, 1512x2016px) Image search: [Google]

717KB, 1512x2016px

>>33835505
For what purpose?

Although the 66 frame is more cute, I prefer the 586/686 models. Easier to reload with speedloaders and ejects the empty brass better.
Also heavier, more roundness to grab and less worry to break it, if you give it a slap.

>>33837689
are you going to post this same picture every time?

>>33837689
I was thinking occasional carry. I will be getting the 4" 686 plus no matter what, I was just wondering if there was a reason to stay 686 in the more compact line.

>>33837558
he's right though, a good smith job can significantly lighten a pull.

do you mean the DA pull specifically? for instance i shot a super redhawk the other day and the SA trigger was maybe a tad over 3lbs.

the ironic thing about some of the revolvers "made for women" i.e. 22/22mags with less recoil, they have way heavier pulls due to being rimfire cartridges

>>33834896
What if I made a 20x102mm revolver rifle? (5/6 cartridges)

File: Seated_Palm-Up_Barbell_Wrist_Curl.png (57KB, 540x360px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 540x360px

>>33837494
Unless you have a medical reason for being a griplet, the solution to your problem doesn't involve a gunsmith.

>>33837634
Taurus 990 comes to mind (9 shots)
SW 617 is fun as hell (10 shots) if pricey.

Never used them but ruger chambers GP100/SP101 in 22LR, 10 and 8 shots respectively i think

File: Revolvers.jpg (346KB, 1144x731px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 1144x731px

Left to Right: S&W 642, Colt Cobra, 1895 Nagant, GP 100.

File: 164300_01_lg_0.jpg (17KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 500x500px

>>33838485
There's literally no reason to get a 66.
The K-frame isn't suited to magnum-heavy firing schedules, and even if that weren't the case, stepping up to the L-frame gets you an extra shot for a mere 2 oz. in the same barrel length.
Also consider the 3" 686P, which actually weighs a tenth of an ounce less than the 4.25" 66 despite having a full underlug and a beefier frame.

>>33838671
Yeah, but we are talking about CCW, the K frame would be thinner and carry better no?

>>33838630
How do you like the ruger? Are they decently priced?

File: 1492537845699.jpg (8KB, 200x192px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 200x192px

>>33834896
Someone told me most new revolvers come with some sort of internal lock that they actually bore a hole in the side of the revolver for you to access. Apparently Smith and Wesson are famous for this?

Is this true? Can someone enlighten me on this alleged nonsense?

>>33838692
Ever so slightly: a mere 0.114".
It'll be easier to find holsters for, as well.
On the other hand, unless you're planning on carrying loaded with .38 SPL +P, the K-frame is a gun that can't withstand regular practice with your carry ammo.

>>33838733
Good ol' clinton hole.

Man never did meet a hole he didn't like.

>>33838733
During the gun control scares of the early 90s S&W introduced a gun lock (the "hillary [clinton] hole") on their models. This was seen as capitulation in the same vein as bill ruger supporting mag size limits.

there are some apparent instances of the recoil on the higher caliber models (.44mag i think) actually activating the lock and preventing further firing until it was unlocked.

>>33838767
>On the other hand, unless you're planning on carrying loaded with .38 SPL +P, the K-frame is a gun that can't withstand regular practice with your carry ammo
s&w fixed the forcing cone issue with old k frames

>>33838720
Rugers are strong work horse guns for a bit less then the smtih's. I have a gp100 and love it thousand+ rounds of 38 and 500ish rounds of full bore 357 with no problems. They are a great value if you plan on shotting a lot of 357. Though if you want a Pretty revolver to shoot every now and then just get a smith. Not saying they break easily, just that the Ruger is more utilitarian in use and looks.

Well I did have a problem with light primer strikes. But that was because I was using after market light springs and reloading with cci primers(which are notorious for being hard).

>>33838797
Bruh he is just spouting fuddlore

>>33838794
>>33838792
So if I buy a new Smith then I get my own "Clinton Hole"?
>makes me gag

Or has that faggotry fallen by the wayside like the "Assault Rifle" ban?

I don't really know shit about revolvers but I've been thinking of getting a .38 to fuck around with

>>33838904
They still include them on new models. Some intentionally mechanically disable it.

The actual chance of it unintentionally activating during normal usage is miniscule, and on a 38sp or 357 probably nil. The argument against it is mostly ideological. So some choose to buy used "pre-hole" models in lieu of new ones.

>>33838767
Ok cool.

>>33838904
I got my new 442 with no Hillary hole, and cut for moon clips.

>>33838904
I've put about 1k rounds through my S&W TRR8, mostly .357 and some .38 and I haven't had the lock engage itself. It does look ugly though imo.

File: 20170502_202132.jpg (628KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

628KB, 2048x1152px

>>33834936
.44mag is best mag.

>>33835174
>1. What's with the circle jerk on Manurhin and why are they better?
They're relatively rare, relatively expensive, used by a famous police organization well past the times when pretty much every other police organization switched to a high-capacity semi, and are built like tanks.
>2. Pros and cons of .327/.357/.41/.44 Magnum?
Hoo, this is gonna be a list.
.327Fed pros:
>extremely versatile on ammo, can shoot .327fed/.32H&Rmag/.32S&W Long/.32S&W Short/.32 Short Colt/.32 Long Colt/.320 Revolver/.32acp without modification
>mild recoil compared to .38spl and .357 from similar-weight guns
>can fit 6 rounds in small-frame revolvers like S&W J-frames compared to 5 of .38/.357, and 7-8 in medium-frame revolvers compared to 6 of .38/.357 (and theoretically 10 in large-frame revolvers, but nobody's done so)
>out of short (</= 2") barrels it out-performs .357mag, and ties it at 3"
>doesn't shrek alloy framed shubbies
.327Fed cons:
>very few guns chambered in it despite its significant advantages
>ammo is expensive (shoot .32acp for practice nigga) and hard to find, although universally high quality
>muzzle climb is disproportionate to recoil
>EXTREMELY LOUD due to higher-than-normal pressures, even out of longer barrels like the Ruger Single Seven

Eh fuck it, pretty much everyone knows .357 and .44mag.

.41mag is in a sweet spot for power vs. recoil, but is considered obsolete and as such ammo is rare and expensive. There is no "special" or alt-caliber that's compatible with it either, unlike the others, and the only reason it's even still produced is target shooters (it also tends to be disproportionately accurate and easy to shoot well with Keith-style semi wadcutters).

>3. Which revolvers hold the most aesthetic? Mateba need not apply.
In my opinion it's a tie between a Bisley Blackhawk and a Remington 1860 cartridge conversion. Excellent lines, excellent finishes.

>4. Is Ruger utter shit?
Fuck no.

>>33835921
Yes, that's extremely overpriced. Like, you could buy a factory new one, get it professionally cerakoted, and still have enough left over for 5 boxes of ammo.

>>33837634
For current production you have the Taurus 990, S&W 617, Ruger GP100, Ruger SP101, Ruger LCRx

For discontinued shit I'd recommend an H&R 999 if you can find it.

>>33838851
Thanks for the info amigo, would the gp100 serve well for defense in the woods or should I go with a 44 (or larger)?

File: image-20160319_211735.jpg (148KB, 1274x956px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1274x956px

my 686 is one of the most accurate handguns i have

>>33835505
How big is your hands
>No homo

File: 20170502_210552.jpg (528KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

528KB, 2048x1152px

>>33839891
Ya'll niggas ain't even got aperture sights on your wheelguns.

Scrubs, the lot of ya.

>>33839942
disgusting

File: k can't hold a revolver.jpg (3MB, 2432x4320px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2432x4320px

>>33839891
Size L glove.

>>33839992
You have shit taste sir.

>>33840055
No u

File: lcr.jpg (355KB, 1000x1135px) Image search: [Google]

355KB, 1000x1135px

Would you buy a compact .22 magnum revolver with three barrels for carry? Consider this:
>Three .22 magnums=about the same recoil as one .38 special
>Three hollow points have the same total surface area and penetrate about as deep as one JHP .38
>Probability of hitting something critical massively improved
>Can squeeze 15 rounds into the size of a five round .38 cylinder by adding an inner row of chambers, giving you the same number of trigger pulls
>Could load only one row for practice or reduced recoil
>.22LR cylinder replacements
>Rimfire reliability not an argument because revolver
>Low pressure .22 reduces manufacturing cost

What do you think? Pic is a shitty comparison of the capacity possible in an LCR cylinder, and yes you can have that small a gap between them, google the NAA revolver if you disagree.

File: 293951da168d435e033315590401faf7.jpg (75KB, 736x466px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 736x466px

>>33840136
1. Volley fire is gay; it's better to be able to bust as many or as few caps as you want by means of pressing the trigger more or fewer times.
2. That in mind, a two-barrel revolver that switched between the two rings of chambers via some mechanical contrivance, firing in an A,A,B sequence, would save weight and give you fifteen shots instead of five at the cost of mechanical complexity.
3. Rimfire ammo unreliability is still an argument beacuse the practicality of your retarded idea is predicated on every single round firing, hitting the target, and expanding, and if any one of them doesn't do any of those things it becomes less effective than a normal 5-shot .38
4. I don't care to look up the numbers, but you're probably wrong about the permanent cavity volume of three .22 Mags vs. a good .38 JHP.
5. .22 Mag fucking sucks monkey nuts no matter how many of them you fire at once (within reason); quit fucking coming into every thread to shill your brain-dead .22 Mag volley-fire retardation.

File: pepeeuphoric.jpg (50KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 900x900px

>>33837308
>that serial

>>33837308
>B00000M

>>33840326
>Volley is gay
I agree, that's why shotguns suck too, I want to choose when each pellet leaves the barrel. It's better that way.
>Switch between barrels
Ah yes, and with the massive stopping power of .22 it's a wonder this wasn't made before.
>My retarded idea wouldn't work because the ammo is unreliable
I see what you mean, about half of all rimfire rounds are duds so it's a huge problem.
>I'm wrong about permanent cavity volumes
No, the best around expand to .62 inches or something, ran the numbers and it worked out
>.22 magnum sucks
I agree. That's why I carry a .38 special. The stats show it does the same thing, maybe with a few downsides, but someone online told me .22 was bad and I trusted him.

>>33838851
How's the trigger out of the box? Does it need any upgrades?

File: mp5.jpg (51KB, 575x249px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 575x249px

>>33840494
>that's why shotguns suck too, I want to choose when each pellet leaves the barrel.
1. >implying triplex .22 Mag and a shell launching nine .330" balls at once are comparable
2. They make guns that let you fire shot pellet-sized projectiles one at a time, and they're way more common in military and LE use than fucking shotguns are because they're more versatile than shotguns are because they allow the user to fire as many or as few shots as they feel necessary rather than arbitrarily dumping a particular number of projectiles into the target every time. Pic related.
>Ah yes, and with the massive stopping power of .22
3. Shooting someone three times with a .22 Mag is shooting someone three times with a .22 Mag, regardless of whether the bullts hit him all at once or in quick succession, and you're the one pretending that it's a viable self-defense cartridge.
>about half of all rimfire rounds are duds so it's a huge problem.
4. Rimfire rounds are demonstrably and well-known to be less reliable than centerfire cartridges; not to the extent that you sarcastically suggest, but enough that nobody ever seriously reccommends rimfire guns for self-defense, and again, if even one of the cartridges in your hypothetical design is a dud or misses then by your own calculations it's not as effective as a .38.

>>33840704
>Shotguns aren't popular with military/LE because you can't control the number of pellets fired
Here I was thinking it was because of their length, low capacity, slow reloads, and shot spread. This was really eye opening though, thanks.
>The three shots are three shots either way
Makes total sense, but I do have to wonder if there would be a delay in pulling the DA trigger multiple times. I know you can do it several times in the blink of an eye but that sounds tricky.
>Rimfire rounds are less reliable
I already agreed, a dud every few trigger pulls is unacceptable.

What's /k/'s take on the Rhino? Is it just a memegun, or is it actually good? It seems to have several advantages that would make it a good CC revolver.

>>33840908
>Is it just a memegun
Not really, it works. It's a reasonably good gat

>several advantages
they're real, but somewhat overstated. if you enjoy it, get one.

I am poor and want a beater .357 revolver. Something I can toss around and not give a fuck about. What should I buy? I think there were Zastava revolvers for sale that were cheap, but I have no clue if they are still.

File: speedloaders-featured.jpg (150KB, 1140x493px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 1140x493px

Question for experienced revolver guys. What's your preference for speed loaders, and how do you carry them around both comfortably and discreetly?

>>33840947
I would, but I'm a 19 year-old noguns in VA with a family that isn't very friendly towards guns. I mainly come on here to masturbate to guns and gather info for when I'm actually in a position to get one.

It's a real shame, because I saw a Factory New Rhino on GB that had a minimum bid of $0.01 that had already been relisted at least once. If I was older, or had a friend who could buy it for me and then sell it to me, I reckon I could have easily gotten it for <$200 all fees included, assuming it was legit.

>>33841172
>how do you carry them around both comfortably and discreetly?
By using strips.

>>33835354
How do you like your Charter Arms? I'm thinking about picking up one of those in .357 since they're about $180 less than the SP101.

>>33841264
i'm sure it had a reserve of at least $500-600.don't feel too bad

>>33841172
>>33841283
Why hasn't somebody made a speedloader that folds in to a flatter shape? Very simple thing to make. Maybe the width difference wouldn't be that big.

File: sp101.jpg (105KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 960x960px

>>33834896
this is my entry into the wheelgat world

>>33841326
Yeah, I figured there had to be something like that in place to prevent criminally low bids. I just figured that the simplest way to do that would be to raise the minimum bid, so I was confused.

Guess I'll just wait a couple years and hope that it stays in production, even though I would rather start learning to shoot sooner than later.

>>33841364
If I were designing something like this, I would make the cartridge holder separate from the ejection mechanism. The holder could be a flat strip with something that locks the ends together. The ejector could be carried as a keychain that slides into the center of the locked together holder.

In the end, it would probably be slow and unreliable, completely negating the purpose of a speed loader. Better just stick to speed strips.

File: DG_BIA_580_Speed Strips_Pair.jpg (278KB, 1500x1139px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 1500x1139px

>>33841364
Beacuse it would take more time to curl it into a circular configuration for use than it would to just use a speed strip, and if you made it curl up on its own you would need a special rigid carrier to keep it flat while you weren't using it and you'd have to have some way to ensure that it curled exactly the right amount to line up with the chambers.

>>33841658
I don't think you understood what I meant. I was talking about a speedloader that could simply fold on hinges to flatten its two halves together, getting rid of the circle of space in the middle. It could maybe also be made of flexible material. Pull it out, press it a bit on the ends, and it pops into shape.

>>33841711
I'm ignoring what you posted in favor of my new idea, a moon clip made out of some kind of spring steel or something so it can be flattened out for carry, but as soon as it clears leather it pops back into shape and can just be dropped straight into the gun.

>>33841905
>I'm ignoring what you posted
>Quotes it anyways
What did he mean by this

>>33839351
Is the trr8/m&pr8 good? Also which one to get? Trr8 or m&p r8?

File: 6047855013_3477e26cff_b.jpg (190KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1024x683px

>>33842219
It's great if you want to mount a light on your revolver.

>>33841315
I got it for cheap off an old guy who was planning on moving, for the price I paid I think its a great gun.

it has some sharp edges like on the hammer, but thats really my only complaint. Its pretty old too

>>33842242
hawt

>>33838490
Sorry, I slept hard. I do mean on DA's. My first experience with a revolver was a Taurus Judge a few years back and I've been hesitant to try again with how the long pull made me struggle to aim.
>>33838533
It's advanced carpal tunnel from martial arts. I'm ambidextrous by nature so it's not like I can't switch, but I like having options and I can't do anything of that sort for long.

>>33842242
But trr8 or m&pr8? I feel like the screw on underbarrel rail of the trr8 will become loose after firing a bit. On the other hand, I don't like the m&p branding of the R8.

>>33842618
That sucks.
I'm not aware of any revolvers that come with an unusually light trigger from the factory, but there are a variety of ways that a gunsmith can reduce a revolver's DA pull, and many of them are safe and reliable enough for serious use.

>>33842676
Use Loctite like you would on any other gun screw and it'll be fine.

>>33842709
Oh well, I live in Indiana so I'll just get a shotgun if I can't improve my grip. Maybe find a smith I can learn from for my own gain.

File: m47.jpg (154KB, 980x593px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 980x593px

>>33834896

there is only one revolver in particular that i would want and that is because it chambers .32 acp, .380, 9x19, .38 super/special, and .357 magnum without a cylinder swap

unfortunately they got for like 4 grand a piece and there's less than 250 of them floating around

What are some advantages a revolver might have over a regular pistol for home self-defense?

t. totally new to guns

>>33843035
Read this.
https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/revolvers-dont-jam-firearms-myths/

File: 20170220_171436.jpg (1MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1440px

My wheelgun. Colt Official Police, .38 Spl. The most accurate handgun I've ever shot, I recently placed three shots in one hole.

1/2

File: 20170307_161848-1.jpg (588KB, 659x1571px) Image search: [Google]

588KB, 659x1571px

>>33843762
2/2

Not said grouping, but one from that day. 10 yards, only double action.

>>33841264
Yeah that's not how it works.

>>33843802
k

>>33840136
Are you the magazine revolver guy?

>>33841028
See if you can find a used Security Six, they can be remarkably low priced and they're sturdy as shit.

>>33841264
You in the Virginia group chat?

Hey, anyone know a good place to purchase wood combat grips? I just got a 65-7 and hate the issued rubber grips on it. I've been looking at altamont, but I've been reading a lot about their QC being shit and their customer return services being total cunts.
I've found the Hogue bantam grips to be pretty much exactly what I want, but people have said that they can slide around on the grip because of how the screw is. That, and I was hoping for something a little less expensive.

File: IMG_0791.jpg (258KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 1000x750px

>>33834896

File: IMG_0503.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

This is by far the most accurate pistol I own. If you want a wheelgat, look no further than a 4" 686.

>>33844767
Not bad for aus

File: IMG_20170430_154746.jpg (2MB, 3854x1819px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3854x1819px

>>33844744
My pachmayr renegades are breddy nice and quite cheap.

>>33844685
Yes.

>>33844783
Looks sexy. What wood is that? rosewood?

>>33844806
Yup. Rosewood. They aren't super nice or anything but they fit well, no wobble, snugged up nicely. A little slick for my taste but I have rubber grips if I need action mode

Hey wheelfags, someone offered me a "like new" "highway pstrolman" for a new glock pistol. If hes legit is this a decent deal? Also just what the hell is a highway patrolman? Sorry. Autofag who doesn't know how to revolvers

>>33844806
Fyi it's the same gun as >>33835866

>>33844818
That took about .7 seconds.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_%26_Wesson_Model_28

They were "budget" model smiths designed for duty use. Very nice guns. Certainly more collectible than a Glock.

>>33844818
Samefag. He said he kinda hates it because
>is heavy
>trigger sorta long
>Shit capacity
>is apparently remarkably heavy

>>33835866
Where are you from?

>>33844848
Heavy is reliable, and if it doesn't work you can always hit them with it.

>>33844858
Boris get out

>>33844783
>>33844811
How rich is the color? The pictures online show it being very light, and I kind of wanted it in a darker brown tone.

>>33844849
Tennessee. Bought it from sog though. 300 is my all in cost after shipping, ffl and grips

File: shekelberg.jpg (203KB, 1913x815px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 1913x815px

>>33844858
No, heavy is expensive.

>>33844889
It's actually quite dark. Those two are the only pics I have right now. But they are dark.

>>33844727
Not that anon, but there's a VA group chat? I'm in VA Beach

>>33844900
Can the hammer lock back at all?

I've been toying with the idea of getting one but don't like the bobbed hammer, was thinking of buying a replacement from numrich if I got one.

>>33844923
Nope, but the da is pretty smooth. You can get a new hammer assy and make it da/SA but I think it would be cheaper just to buy a hammered model. They have em. I already have an mr73 so I figured I'd snag me a lil 38 da for the wife's nightstand

File: IMG_20170430_173430.jpg (3MB, 3456x4608px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3456x4608px

Ruger redhawk I just traded my glock 21 with a 10mm barrel and $120 for. Any suggestions for nice grips and a shoulder holster?

>>33844965
Hogue monogrips are ugly but great for recoil control.

Any of you guys have a mateba revolver? Planning on getting 1 and i would like the pros/cons

>>33844965
Pachmyrs are aesthetic don't fuck with them

>>33839942
This is the dumbest shit I've ever seen

Feel bad

>>33838902
Nope forcing cones on old k frame 357s would crack at the 6oclock position with regular use.

Go hang yourself faggot

>>33844921
Yeah, Innawoods VA. My kik is WWIIGuy, send me a message and I'll add you. Same goes for any VA anons.

>>33844908
Interesting. I'll definitely be looking into them.

>>33845040
You are right, but the frame cracking and forcing cone issues seem to have been a result of early light (125gr) magnum loads. There was a Remington offering in particular that was found to have caused many of the issues.

Plenty of folks have had no issues shooting heavy magnum loads, like 158gr, on a regular basis in their k frames.

Of course, I have no real expertise on this, and the sources of my info are through forums so take what I'm saying with a grain of salt.

I'd like to have a revolver, but I can't because lol NY

>>33834896
Revolver-fags: Is it really that big of a deal if a S&W revolver has a lock on it, or is it more like series 70 vs. 80 in 1911's?

>>33845141
doesnt affect the function much.
its more about giving money to a company that shits on good design, just to sell its own product to itself with a loss to get tax returns

>>33845114
what
what did they do this time

>>33845141
No. Even if you get a .44 magnum and plan to run hot loads through it, you can remove the lock fairly easily. It's just kind of ugly and a reminder that smith and wesson corporate suck.

>>33845040
Not at all relevant to someone shopping new 66s you dumb fudd shitbag. Go back to /r/guns

File: IMAG0697.jpg (3MB, 5376x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5376x3024px

So I've officially seen the light. Back in Autumn, I picked up a ca. 1950's S&W Hand Ejector/Model 10 for cheap. Definite patina, big chip out of the bottom of the wood of the grip on one side, but the rifling was good and the timing was sound.

All I've gotten to do with it until a couple weeks ago was play with it. Dry fire, learn the feel of the weights and breaks of the SA and DA pulls. Even then, I knew I liked it; even for a mass-produced gun, the DA pull was smoother than anything else I've fired up till this point (all automatics as far as handguns, mind you).

But recently, I finally got to shoot it. Oh man. Now I see why people truly like revolvers. This ~60 year-old gun made me happy in a way I haven't been towards a gun in a long time. the .38 chambering made it an absolute pleasure to shoot and want to just keep on shooting, and what surprised the hell out of me was how damn accurate the thing was. I shot scores better with that than with any autoloading handgun to date.

For practicality's sake I'm sure I'll stick with an autoloader for carry, but I'd be a liar if I said that I didn't want to throw this thing into the rotation every once in a while.

Honestly, what should the next step be in the world of wheelguns?

File: get memed on kid.jpg (49KB, 665x382px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 665x382px

>>33838733
modern smith wesson revolvers come with the chastity lock

>>33845499

>optional safeties triggers me

>>33845515
>I want my gun to accidentally lock up from recoil at any potential time I might need it

>>33845515
>5dollar bikelock safety on a 1000 dollar gun
atleast make it optional, or hide it behind the grips

>>33845547
This.

>>33844727
No. Guess I'll try to get in on that. Thanks for telling me about it.

>>33845259
it's just I would need to get approved for a permit which costs $350, and it's not a lifetime permit, you need to keep renewing it. And that's assuming you can get approved for a permit

>>33834931
Where can I get one and how much should I expect to pay?

>>33845946
France. And a lot.

>>33840447
KUBE IS WITH YO

>>33846451
Oh well fuck me then kek

>>33846588
For real doe. They are hard to find. The 2-3k on GunBroker aren't unfair for a mint example. I bought one of the classic surplus models a few years ago >>33835837 for $500 but that's a rare find. And that's the shape $500 gets you.

>>33845403
Something in .357, perhaps?

>>33847493
I was thinking either that or just going full retard to a .44

I've always thought Rhinos are neato but I'm forever on the fence on if I want one badly enough to justify the price:gimmick ratio

>>33844790
When are you gonna do your monstrosity with a +30lbs double-action trigger?

>>33844848
He sounds like a dainty faggot, give him the Glock and take the nice revolver off his hands, you'll appreciate it more.

>>33845141
I think it's shitty that they do it, but it can be dealt with.

>>33845515
It's a really shit safety though, worse than grip safeties and magazine disconnects combined.

>>33845547
>>33845673
That really isn't as common as you say it is.

>>33847786
>That really isn't as common as you say it is.

Probably true, but if I'm presented with two guns, one having a 0.0005% chance of locking up when I need it and getting myself killed and one having a pure 0% chance, I'm going to want to go with the one that eliminates the entire possibility.

give me a quick rundown on the pros and cons of doing a full long trigger pull vs pulling the hammer back manually each time

>>33835402
>You can get a new stainless 686 for that

I'd rather have a beat to shit, shot out mr73 than a new in box smith and wesson

Gp100 or g20? Or should I save up for something like the trr8?

>>33847928
DA can be fired arbitrarily fast, is plenty accurate for most practical shooting, and is godlike for developing good trigger control practices.
SA is too light to use practically under stress, even the simulated stress of a action shooting sport, not to mention the awkwardness of breaking and reaquiring your firing grip between shots, but takes your trigger control largely out of the equation for longer, more precise shots.
99% of shooters are doing themselves a disservice by shooting SA at all because they're using it on close, high-probability targets to enable their bad shooting habits.

>>33848037
What's your intended application?

File: IMG_0193.jpg (205KB, 933x723px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 933x723px

>Want Mr73
>don't think its worth the dosh
>don't want one that's beat looser than Sasha Grey's asshole and rusted

Oh well.
Model 19 instead.

File: HST on motorcycle with Model 29.jpg (57KB, 678x432px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 678x432px

>>33847686
.44 Magnum is best caliber.
Keep in mind that you'll basically have to take up reloading to keep it fed unless you're independently wealthy.
On the other hand, rolling your own means you can load them as hot or as soft as you want to maximize your shooting enjoyment.

>>33835843
unfortunatly not

File: Gign-11.jpg (46KB, 517x511px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 517x511px

>>33848264
It's totally worth it, though.
The barrel steel is folded a million times and it can shoot through a tank.

>>33848239
Camp gun, easier to lug around than a shotgun

>>33848402
Glock 20 and bear spray

>>33848441
Would you recommend a metal 10mm over the g20? Like the EAA witness?

>>33847724
Add a gas tube.

>>33848474
The Glock's frame's ability to bend and flex under recoil gives it a durability advantage over most metal 10mms, many of which are dangerously under-engineered and develop frame and slide cracks at relatively low round counts.
It's also lighter, of course, which is beneficial for a gun that'll be carried over hill and dale in addition to other gear.
Furthermore, I assume you already own at least one other Glock pistol, so the 20 would be easier for you to pick up and start using with a minimum of familiarization time.

>>33835318
YAAAAAAAASSSSSSS

>>33848549
I do, but I've got Manle hands so my only hope is a gen 4 g20 but I can't find any locally. How does "full power" 10mm feel? Is it recoil heavy?

>>33848710
Manlet*

File: 2016-11-18 08.35.32.jpg (1MB, 3771x2121px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3771x2121px

>>33848578
Would recommend.

>>33848783
What's that?

>>33848264
I had a 686 when I got my tired mr73. I sold my 686. Incomparable.

>>33847948
Truth.

File: 2016-10-24 16.07.51.jpg (1MB, 3771x2121px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3771x2121px

>>33848877
The Smith & Wesson trr8 8 rounds of 357 Magnum power. Has a great trigger amazing balance low recoil I love this handgun.

>>33849068
>Rails
Oh look an abortion

>>33849068
I had an M&P R8, had to sell it during the housing crash. I loved that gun.

>>33835515
manurhin's are so beautiful. Are they easy to come by in the states?

>>33849068
Ohhh nice. How much did that run ya?

>>33837634
>when your boyfriend lets you borrow his gun

File: Man Urin.png (3MB, 1593x1262px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1593x1262px

>>33835064
Korths are great, at least the models made when WIlli was still part of the company. I shot a .22 made in the 70s 2 weeks ago and it was just as good as my MR22. Ethnic german here as well. I would not shell out 3k for one of the new ones though.

File: 2016-09-16 12.01.45.jpg (779KB, 2121x3771px) Image search: [Google]

779KB, 2121x3771px

>>33849663
800 got it off some guy during the housing crash >>33849491
Only joking but I did get it for a hundred bucks I forgot you had to sell it he was not happy about his situation.

>>33849840
For $800*

>>33840704

You're a fucking insuferable faggot

>>33842676
They're the same price, I got the TRR8 because I didn't want a fuckhuge logo on my gun. Also I don't use the bottom rail much so I detached it. Can't do that on an R8.

My rails haven't come loose at all, but if they do, don't use loctite, it's fucking garbage. Blue and red are too strong and purple is too weak. Use vibra-tite v3, it's also what S&W actually uses in their side plate screws.

Also be prepared for the barrel shroud nut to come loose. You'll have to screw it back on, which is compatible, or send it back to S&W for them to tighten it. Why? Because when you tighten the barrel nut, the barrel moves forward, which leaves you with a fuckhuge cylinder gap, unless you vibratite the frame threading S&W uses a special tool that holds the barrel in place while the nut is being tightened.

The gun is accurate and the trigger is excellent, but the barrel shroud is a shitshow.

>>33849570
They can be bought from a dealer
http://www.gunsinternational.com/guns-for-sale-online/pistols/manurhin/manurhin-mr73.cfm?gun_id=100666856
but they cost $3000 and there's a six-month lead time.

>>33851364
screw it back on with a Dan Wesson barrel nut wrench**
accidentally deleted that bit.

File: 1463799684892.jpg (33KB, 800x535px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 800x535px

>>33851384
>>33851364
I've heard of this and I've had the same luck with the rails but I've never had a problem with the barrel shroud I guess it's just a matter of time. I'm not sure how much longer or if it's been done before because I've put nearly a thousand rounds through this gun already with zero issues.

>>33851461
I had it happen to me after ~100. And a loose barrel shroud absolutely kills accuracy.

Had to go through a lot of trouble to retighten the barrel nut and get the cylinder gap back under 0.006 inches. Hasn't given me trouble since then and accuracy doesn't seem to be affected.

If it hasn't come loose in 1k rounds you're fine.
But whoever decided to make the barrel nut turn in the same direction as the frame thread shot be fucking executed.

File: 1479818594128.jpg (859KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

859KB, 1600x1200px

>>33851517
Yeah thats pretty stupid.
Not my gun.

>>33851583
my TRR8 is way up in the thread. vortex comes friday
>>33835813

>>33834976
Where can I buy one ?

>>33851687
http://www.gunsinternational.com/guns-for-sale-online/pistols/manurhin/manurhin-mr73.cfm?gun_id=100666856

>>33845008
Keeping the pachmeyers for when I tromp through the kenai looking for yogi and because I have pachmeyers on my black hawk. Just looking for aesthetic wood grips for shoulder holster carry.

I got a GP100 as my first revolver yesterday. Did I fuck up?

>>33852673

Solid utilitarian revolver.

>>33852673
Very nice!

File: taurus judge comic sans.png (466KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

466KB, 720x540px

>>33852882

File: hgswperform_053007e.jpg (19KB, 420x238px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 420x238px

What ya'll think of this thing? Seems well regarded, for a full sized snubbie.

File: performanacecenter327.jpg (496KB, 2850x1241px) Image search: [Google]

496KB, 2850x1241px

>>33853450

>>33852673
So did I about 3 weeks ago. No major complaints so far, except maybe for having to change out the houge grip for one that better fits my hands.

File: 1.jpg (374KB, 2010x944px) Image search: [Google]

374KB, 2010x944px

Newest addition, for my single action cowboy needs.

Lots of elitists here. Whew.

>>33853450
>>33853494
I just can't get over the color disparity between the barrel and cylinder with the frame. It just looks, odd.

>>33855057
I quite like it. S&W also had a stainless steel cylinder rather than the standard titanium one. It looks pretty good in a 3-tone color scheme as well, in my opinion.

>>33849068

That thing is dope. kinda has a Blade Runner vibe to it

File: 4.jpg (55KB, 526x394px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 526x394px

I really dig three inch barrel revolvers now, and I blame Hickock45 and The Last of Us for it

>>33835354
In the same line as using .38spl in a .357, the .327 can use 32 S&W, .32 S&W Long, .32 HR Magnum. The big difference being that those cartridges aren't exactly cheap most of the time, but .38spl isn't as cheap as people make it out to be either, just softer shooting.

Apparently. 32acp works but isn't ideal since it's tapered and only has a semi rim

>>33842949
So will a k/L frame .357 cut for moon clips. I fucking love the M47 but I've given up on finding one a long time ago

>>33855925
New man 38sp is sub 25cpr all day. The only other listed cartridge that comes close in price is 32apc. And it sucks, as you said.

File: 20170504_102458.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>33841172
I like the Safariland Comp 1 and 2 speedloaders. No twisting, just push and they pop in. Carry them in Jox loader pouches that just go around your belt, very quick access and good retention.

File: medusa m47.jpg (157KB, 1000x653px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 1000x653px

>>33834931
youre right, there only can be one

>>33857291
overrated novelty gun for LARPers

File: HPIM0744.jpg (705KB, 2160x1620px) Image search: [Google]

705KB, 2160x1620px

>>33845499
What I see

>>33855765
3" barrel is best inch barrel.

File: ian.jpg (5KB, 250x175px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 250x175px

>>33858707
This

So is there no point to shooting .357 Mag out of 2" snubby? I heard that it loses a lot of velocity. How is it out of 3"?

>>33861827
>heard that it loses a lot of velocity
it does, but it will still outperform .38sp by a bit, and maybe barely even 9mm (i hear) from that length. the compromise usually espoused is that with .38 you get nearly the same performance at that length with noticeably less recoil.

>How is it out of 3"
a lot better.

>>33861827
>no point to shooting .357 Mag out of 2" snubby
fuddlore
http://www.luckygunner.com/labs/revolver-ballistics-test/
the real reason to go for a 3" barrel is so you can have a full-length ejector rod

>>33853450
Its completely retarded, that's what I think

File: 1493448406891.jpg (3MB, 3036x4048px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3036x4048px

>>33834896
i am looking for a cc revolver in 9mm that can basically be used to protect against jamal -- will i risk ear damage? i know, is my life worth more than my hearing but can you fire 9mm revolver without damage? any recommends?

File: 66-275ls.jpg (102KB, 900x675px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 900x675px

>>33863167
Literally all guns are literally deafeningly loud.
If you fire a gun without hearing protection, you will permanently fuck up your hearing.
Period.
A good CCW revolver would be a S&W Model 66 2.75"
It's light enough that you can carry it all day if you want to, but not so light that it's unpleasant or difficult to practice with.
It's not in 9mm, but 9mm revolvers are a niche item primarily for enthusiasts and competition shooters.

>>33835174
Ive got a ruger security six and gp 100 both stainless 4 inch barrel. They have both been really great revolvers. The heavier design is great for my lady because she prefers .38 and it really dampens any recoil to almost nothing while I mainly run .357 through them. Theyve been our nightstand guns for years with no complaints.

File: HarriesFlashlightTechnique.gif (33KB, 350x288px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 350x288px

>>33863278
>Theyve been our nightstand guns for years
What's your preferred handheld light technique?

>>33861849
>>33861882
Alright. I guess I'll look into it some more. Thanks for spoonfeeding.

>>33863150
Care to share your reasoning why?

File: DSC_8625.jpg (285KB, 1536x1024px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 1536x1024px

Bought the Redhawk off Gunborker a month ago. Still haven't gotten ammo for it.

>>33839459
I kinda want to get a single action

File: 1456508030922.jpg (2MB, 2656x1494px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2656x1494px

>>33835174
>>33835174
>1. What's with the circle jerk on Manurhin and why are they better?
autistic anime fanboys, they arent better than any similar tier brand

>>33835174
>2. Pros and cons of .327 / .357 / .41 / .44 Magnum?
depends on what you want to do with the gun, you wouldnt take a 327 on an alaskan grizzly hunt would you?

>>33835174
>3. Which revolvers hold the most aesthetic? Mateba need not apply.
colts and s&ws objectively are the best looking and have the highest aesthetic features throughout history

>>33835174
>4. Is Ruger utter shit?
rugers are rock solid and durable as fuck. so no, they are amazing guns. but they are ugly as shit. especially the abomination you posted. the blackhawk is one of the dumbest looking revolvers ever made

>>33835505
do you want a gun thats lighter for carry and less durable or a beefier gun thats more durable but also heavier

>>33837263
>>33837263
>>33837263
ew

>>33837420
only buy s&w if you get it used, without the ugly hole on the side

File: Pistola_Con_Caricato_11.jpg (22KB, 400x391px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 400x391px

>>33840326
volley fire is the principle shotguns work on. its scientifically proven a few rounds totalling the same diameter as a bigger round do more terminal ballistic damage. i think his example is novel except for the obvious flaw of using a rimfire cartridge.

anyway its already been done before, his exact idea already exists

practically its probably not too popular due to weight and size of the handgun

>>33841028
used ruger. dont buy the armscor garbage, the metal will wear out before you know it and youll have a paperweight

>>33841172
you cant really carry them too discretely, you have to dress around them. they were developed for police who wore their gear openly

>>33843035
more powerful caliber is really their best advantage over common semi autos. they less complicated so i suppose if you needed to hand it off to a family member who wasnt trained, its more intuitive...just pull the trigger. no mag to accidentally drop or safety to fiddle with

>>33843762
are those the original grips? i have one im trying to source replacement grips for...they seem to pop on and off the auction sites every once in a while but i havent been able to time getting one. if you got yours from a vendor can you tell me where

>>33845141
its a big deal. they are ugly as fuck with some pointless shit on it that you are never sure if it will fail or fucking lock your gun while you are shooting

>>33845164

and this. i am not going to reward their bad behavior by buying their ugly shit new. all my s&ws are pre-lock that i bought on the second hand market


for most revolverfags, the aesthetic is a pretty big part of the reason you are buying the gun. a stupid hole drilled into the side that serves no purpose but to remind you of gun control and political correctness ruins that

File: 1461210295020.jpg (392KB, 1000x645px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 1000x645px

>>33845403
what he said>>33847493


find a nice K frame or a N frame in 357 like pic related. or go colt

File: 1491712025112.jpg (21KB, 427x427px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 427x427px

>>33854949
It's goddamned 3 in the morning on a fucking zimbabwean fecal-painting board and you think everyone here is going to be nice?

>>33854949
its a revolver thread. these people are literally the equivalent of fedora, vest and plaid pants with gold pocketwatch portland coffee snobs

>>33863167
revolvers are a bad gun if you are concerned about hearing damage. one of the reasons why i dont think they make good indoor home defense guns. all those gasses going sideways. imagine shooting full power 357 loads in a hallway without earpro...ouch

File: IMG_2344.jpg (2MB, 4012x2762px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4012x2762px

>>33865075
You shut your whore mouth.

File: 12746114_2.jpg (49KB, 1200x550px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 1200x550px

>>33865115
exquisite taste m'sir

File: 1487062611013.jpg (4MB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4160x2340px

>>33865115
>>33865131

File: 1480382087506.jpg (204KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 1600x1200px

>>33865115
>>33865134
just make my peepee harder senpai

File: IMG_2421.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

>>33865131
*tips fedora*

File: 9858984_1.jpg (31KB, 640x413px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 640x413px

>>33865137
>>33865115
harden up your peepees men, this is now a revolver pornographic webpage

File: 12498546_1.jpg (39KB, 1024x575px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 1024x575px

>>33865143
is that peepee hard yet

File: 1489252732215.jpg (694KB, 3072x2304px) Image search: [Google]

694KB, 3072x2304px

>>33865143
>>33865146
flick it

File: 1477254853423.jpg (1MB, 4272x2848px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4272x2848px

>>33865151
>>33865143
mama said you cant hurry loveeeeeeeeee

File: 1487219383094.jpg (77KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 1024x768px

>>33865155
with 357 you never have to wait

File: 238snubs2.jpg (123KB, 896x672px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 896x672px

>>33865159
the single action is so eeassssyyy

File: 1461436376914.jpg (225KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 1600x1200px

>>33865171
loves a game of masterrrr-bate

File: 1458786639180.jpg (80KB, 897x768px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 897x768px

look at this slut, you can see everything

File: Chiappa Rhino.jpg (42KB, 1000x579px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 1000x579px

>>33837263
You are my nigger.

>>33865244
>>33837263
Waiting for a 3 incher that isn't ugly as sin

>>33865294
I really don't see why people think the rhino is ugly, I love the way it looks. I can see why people might not like the mateba's look though,

what is the exact model that gign uses? I know its mr73 not much more

>>33865402
Uh well the police designation was F1 Special Police. They don't really have a bunch of different model/series numbers like S&W does. Just MR 73. Police tended to use the shorter barrel lengths, but sometimes would attach bipods and scopes to the 10.75" variants and use them for urban sniping.

>>33864875
>I'm poor

>>33864875
>autistic anime fanboys, they arent better than any similar tier brand
You're right, they're about on the same level as similar brands, such as Korth. But they shit on lesser guns like ruger, rohm, S&W, colt, Smith, taurus etc.

>>33865687
taurus isnt even a tier its a joke. jk, but then what does that make armscor

>>33865315
I'm talking about the 3 inch version with the atrocious "white rhino" pattern cerrakote, which is incidentally the only three-inch version currently on sale.

I personally like the way the rhino looks, especially since there are very practical reasons for its appearance.

The Mateba is pretty neat as well.