NATO tank challenge: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imTQyFMNhI0
OPFOR tank challenge: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAf0IyNEdcM
What went wrong?
First one looks like just an accuracy test
Second one is a mobility test
and notice on the second one at 2:00 and 2:53 and, they are doing accuracy tests with the same slow boring movement. It's just edited into the video with lots of movement tests
>>33779108
first is a combat training competition
second is a tank race with biathlon rule set
the later actually pushed the tank and crew to their limit
proof is in the latter competition, the tank break dow a lot
>>33779424
In second vid there are less misses than hits in 1st
>>33779431
Only proof I see is chinese tanks break as much as their other products.
>>33779677
the be fair
the Type-96B is a 2 years old design, had not even completed the state test
and it already beat the T-72B3M in the individual race
>>33779677
but it can still run though, which is more than what m1a can do under the same circumstances
>>33779732
Yeah, it's not like the M1 has been in combat or anything.
>>33779722
Was the suspension changed from the 96A to the 96B? No? Then you are damage controlling.
>>33779108
I love the Ariete, it looks like WW2 italian tanks with the rivets.