why those stupid monkeys hold m4 rifle this way?it is really comfortable to hold rifle by magazine?
>>33757867
Sure, when you don't have these
>>33757867
Holding it higher by the mag well is more comfortable, holding further down the hand guard is more stable, applying pressure to the mags themselves can lead to feed problems
You're complaining about how an untrained combatant fires a rifle?
>>33757867
>it is really comfortable to hold rifle by magazine?
it is. Vertical lever to grab provides more natural and effective stance and grip on the weapon.
>>33757867
>Is it really comfortable to hold the rifle by magazine?
Yes, that's why so many people automatically do it
vertical grips are good when your gun is 7lbs loaded
>>33758489
Please note these people are grabbing the magwell not the magazine
>>33757909
>Says the American, as he puts another chip into his mouth, never having fought a war or had any real conflict beyond petty squabbles and needlessly escalated conflicts
>>33758535
Yea, no.
>>33758547
Sorry my country isn't some unstable shithole that has a civil war every 10 years.
>>33758535
There's no "magwell" so to speak on AK-style rifles, mate. It is just a hole at the bottom of the receiver.
>>33758535
>magwell
There is no magwell there. It is just the top of the magazine.
>>33758603
>>33758489
Are you so fucking dense that the equivalent would be holding the rifle by the bottom of the AK mag? Its a stupid, uncomfortable, inefficient shooting method
>>33758603
What are the red circles for?
Some new pouch?
>>33758618
>holding the rifle by the bottom of the AK mag
How would that be equivalent? The guy in OP pic grabs the mag like it was a vertical grip, not by its base.
>>33758635
I think they were made by some other Anon, asking about the gear & said pouches.
>>33758547
>says the Eurocuck as America comes and saves his ass in every conflict started by someone culturally enriching your wife
>>33758725
>implying that's actually ever been a thing
Ahh, history classes, truly a highlight of the maerican education system.
>>33758547
says the obsessed euro
>>33758636
>I failed the simple machines unit in class: the post
Holding at the top won't "twist" or "bend" the magazine much at all, holding it lower will.
Think of the magazine as a simple lever, and the rifle as the fulcrum. The further down the mag is held and pulled the more leverage is applied to the mag as it works against the fulcrum.
Go back to class Johnny.
>>33759033
I guess that's why everyone and their mothers have already switched to polymer mags. Except yanks.
>>33758850
Sure it has
>What are the Barbary states and the US marines
>back to back World Wars
>Every single nuance of slav conflict
>prevented Resurgence of the Neo-Ottoman incursion by KGB backed Wahhabi jihadists from 1940 on up
Kiss this mongrel ass as recompense
Fuck i hope Le Pen wins, this is tiresome
>>33759059
>implying polymer doesn't also bend and twist
>implying polymer mags can't be shifted and cause the same feeding issues
>implying it didn't take forever to realize polymer mags need actual feed lips
>>33759149
Sauce on dat sweet booty for uh... Research purposes?
>>33758489
no. It's a less tiring stance which is nice, but you surrender control of the front of the weapon when you're holding behind and below the front.
the reason c clamping works is because you have more muscle on the barrel
>>33758547
>chip
M8, isn't it time for your daily prayer st the local mosque?
>>33757919
>applying pressure to the mags themselves can lead to feed problems
Does anyone know if this is true?
>>33758547
t.butthurt Euro