The AR Is Reliable

>>33756701
I give it five minutes tops before someone starts posting that AK mud test.

his rifle is improperly gassed.

>>33756701
>ejecting straight forward
>bolt moving too fast to pick up a round and chamber properly
>stovepiping

Textbook overgassing. Needs a heavier buffer

File: 507F8A9B-FFA3-42EB-B578-F92AFEA72275-1054-000002E0DC941078.jpg (72KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 640x640px

>>33756767
In AK overgassed is good for extraction why AR have that soft ass grip

Nitride isn't for sustained full auto.

>>33756701
This is why Americans don't use automatic fire. AR simply can't into it.

>>33756767
>>33756710
AK is immune to overgassing.

>>33756809
The American goys would find out their precious AR platform sucks and muh commie guns are superior in everyway.

>>33756818
AK is also immune from not being a shit rifle

>>33756809
SOCOM have been using M4 and M4A1 for supressing fire instead of SAW

the only problem is the barrel blow up

>>33756915
This is the most retarded thing I have ever read on /k/.

>>33756921
it is true tho u dunce

>>33756921
it is true

that is one of the reason for the SOCOM barrel

>>33756915
Yea having your barrel blow up mid firefight is definitely inconvenient.

File: ak lovers.png (980KB, 1752x1342px) Image search: [Google]

980KB, 1752x1342px

>>33756834
>>33756809
>>33756818
>>33756784
>>33756707

>samefagging this hard

slavaboo go play with your übermensch butt buddies

>>33757006
>15 posts
>14 ips
ok

>>33756701
>Geissele buffer
Lel. Should've used A5.

>>33757006
>posting Reddit meme in /k/
>accuse other of samefagging

>>33757023
>buh buh buh buh buh its le reddit meme!

try harder newfag

Do you guys just thrive off of pissing matches or can you honestly not accept that the two platforms are just decent?

>>33757032
>posting reddit meme
>accuse other of newfag

File: AK-explode-660x364.jpg (49KB, 660x364px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 660x364px

>>33757043
>get triggered by meme
>WAHH WAHHH MUST BE FROM LE REDDIT

lurk more newfag, this is too easy LMFAO

File: 1391875140876.jpg (43KB, 745x469px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 745x469px

>>33757046
>shitty part kit built, builder don't know how to check head space

vs

>military M4 blow up by itself

stoner shit rifle asshurt fanboys arriving in 3 2 1

but...muh ian muh biased mud test, muh larry snickers choad

>>33757046

> shit build

ar does the same thing and you ar fanboys say the same thing, it's not mill-spec.... but but it's not dd or bcm

File: 0000000qwreqw.jpg (15KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 300x300px

>>33757068

>>33757053
And why don't you post the OP of that picture?

http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_3_118/243136_.html&page=1

>barrels tested for destruction
>The barrels are DPMS 1:9 4140 steel

lol slavaboos are mentally retarded

>>33757071
so in either case shit builds suck who would have guessed

>>33757080
because it's not mil spec am i right ?

>>33757092
>barrels tested for destruction
>barrels get destroyed

gee muh single digit iq slavaboo brain says we still got muh relitabilitah hurr durr

>>33757080
you cann't find the same pic for AK because Ak barrel are better

File: 610xxn1.jpg (98KB, 610x395px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 610x395px

>>33757105
>not throwing away your shitty ak before it reaches a high round count

nice try

>>33756915
>>33756926
>>33756932
The reason for the SOCOM barrel is even in semi-auto fire, M4's can't take multi-hour firefights, see The Battle of Wanat.

>>33757099

yes because having a reliable rifle is just a bad idea

>>33757141
>yes because having a reliable rifle is just a bad idea

Because only the AK can hold the title of reliability?

Typical mental midget slavaboo pushing his iota of a brain to the limit

The AR15 was just a bad idea all around. The fucking AIR FORCE chose the US service rifle, which is like the Army selecting submarines for the Navy. And McNamara, that fucking cocksucker forced it in the military because of his "Wiz Kids".
http://m.washingtontimes.com/

File: xApcpzU.jpg (128KB, 800x566px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 800x566px

>>33757159
>The fucking AIR FORCE chose the US service rifle, which is like the Army selecting submarines for the Navy

and this is supposed to be objectively worse than adopting a gun designed by a tank mechanic turned tank commander? hahhahahahhahahahhaha

>>33757151

>muh slavaboo
>muh vatnik

come on now

File: oQenW1L.jpg (2MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x4032px

>>33757216
>implying this isnt u

mmkay

>>33756701
mmm I love watching that baby purr, even with the malfunctions it's a beautiful machine.

>>33757243
a local child operates out of his mothers boyfriends house in the californian suburbs - colorized

Okay newfag question. How many of these 500 dollar ARs will actually hold up in combat conditions? I've been thinking of getting a cheap one just in case another scare comes by the time I raise enough for a better one.

>>33757295
same question

I'm not really interested in semi auto rifles, but these cheap as fuck ARs make me interested for the sheer practicality of an effective, modular, easy to shoot, and inexpensive carbine, IF they actually hold up.

>>33757042
yes

>>33757011
how do you know that those are 14 different IPs?

>>33756701
You know, I was literally coming here to post "AR fags will defend this", but they've already done it.
>Muh over gassing
>Muh head spacing
>Shitty parts kit
>Shooter isn't ARing correctly
If there is a laundry list of things you have to double check with your AR just so it doesn't malfunction, then it really isn't very reliable in the first place.
Inb4
>B-b-but any firearm will malfunction if it's not properly cared for and assembled correctly!
This is more than just that, and you AR fanboys know it.
>

>>33757593
This. It only works with very careful tuning.
>my AR doesn't like these mags
>my AR doesn't like this ammo
>tula ammo wew
>gassing just right
>lubricating just right
And the you look at AR sideways and it jams.

File: IMG_0182.jpg (31KB, 518x382px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 518x382px

>>33757046
>gets this triggered by bantz
Newfags, I swear to god.

>>33757614
you forget

> haha the ak sucks it failed a mud test , it's a non name garage build or i.o/century turd it doesn't matter all aks are the same


>oh no that ar failed, well.....well thats because it wasn't (posh ar company here)

they do the same thing they accuse ak guys of doing

>not buying the superior kraut-rifle
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjMH94PuT_I

File: 23412341235123423151234.jpg (100KB, 750x844px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 750x844px

>>33757593
>>33757614
Just going to strawman here, it beat out any of the Ak's round count on IV8888 or AOU vids

Hell if it was a 20" pencil it'd dissipate heat better

>>33757643

because it jammed every 2 seconds giving it time to cool

>>33756818
can't overgas when it doesn't fire

>>33757689
can't fire when is jammed by own carbon

File: fire_to_destruction_table_1-1024x562.jpg (79KB, 1024x562px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1024x562px

>>33757129
Sure, but that barrel on a 7.62x38 starts stringing after 4-5 rounds, so I wouldn't expect any better there.

And even putting a thicker barrel isn't going to magically keep the chamber from cooking off rounds once the weapon has cycled for that long.

>>33757593
>>33757614
>>33757628

I would say there is a pretty significant difference between
1. Rifles coming from the factory
and
2. Rifles build from an amateur who has clearly fucked it up (overgassed)

>>33757784

okay but it's still a ar, if the tables were turned and this was a homebuild ak you would just say it was a ak

>>33757754
>M16 being destroyed first.
What rigged shit is this!?!

>>33757789
No, I wouldn't. You should know if the rifle was built to spec before you assess the system's reliability. A wasr coming from the factory and an M4 from FN should both be in spec, so then you can properly assess it.

This is not that case. It's an out of spec rifle. An out of spec AK will fuck up just as much.

>>33757806

okay then that means the ian and karl mud test is void then

>>33757807
I believe Ian and Karl's rifle was definitely in spec. Russian parts kit on a Romanian receiver, and I trust Karl and Ian to not use a defective rifle.

>>33757816

they have factory ak's why didn't they use them ?

>>33757816
>tapco trigger group

>in spec

pick one

>>33757820
Probably because they assessed that their rifle was in spec? Ask them why they used a parts-kit rifle instead of a factory rifle. I'd use a parts-kit AR if I knew it was in spec.

>>33757825
Is there something wrong with tapco triggers?

>>33756809
Kalashnikov catches fire after 300 rounds of sustained full auto

AR gas tube fails around 1000 round of sustained full auto, and costs $10 to fix and 5 minutes to fix.

>>33757159
Because the chair force knew the M14 was shit and 762nato was shit while the rest of the world knew this in 1945

Just like everyone pretty much adopts AR platforms over domestic designs except for turd world who has to get AKs.

>>33757844
AK will still function fine while on fire

>>33757834
No. The G2 is fine.

>>33757784
Do you know how you call not overgassed AR? Under-gassed short stroke.

>>33757872
Don't be retarded Anon.

No AK or M4 is good as a LMG.

And Ivan ain't holding a flaming rifle

>>33757844
>catches fire after 300 rounds
yeah no try 1000

>>33756818

Golly gee, I sure wish you would have told my saiga that before it beat the rear trunnion loose and the whole thing had to be rebuilt on a new receiver.

>>33757876
fine if you like your bolt carrier to hang up and be gritty hence why it failed

>>33757976
sounds like someone did a shit conversion or had a worn spring

>>33757807
Fine with me. Shoving dirt inside a gun to determine which is 'better' has to be the most juvenile idea ever.

>>33756701
Jesus Christ. So much for that 12-15 rounds per minute sustained fire.

>>33757784
Ok, I'll add it to the list of all the other excuses as to how an AR can malfunction, yet is totally reliable, and its not the ARs fault.
>*brings out notepad and pen*
>A....R....is...not....from.... factory....
There! so now we have
>>33757593
>>33757614
>Muh over gassing
>Muh head spacing
>Shitty parts kit
>Shooter isn't ARing correctly
>my AR doesn't like these mags
>my AR doesn't like this ammo
>tula ammo wew
>gassing just right
>lubricating just right
>AR is not from factory
Anything else I should add while I'm at it?

I lost IQ points reading these weak AK fag posts

Has anyone noticed Mrgunsngear ALWAYS comments on other popular gun Youtuber videos. Hell, these "meltdown" videos are even a knockoff of the IV8888 ones that have a lot of views apiece.

Typical Floridian, desperate for attention.

>>33758307
>>33758307

Pretty much all of the youtube gun channels(minus a few) are the same. They start off pretty decent and eventually all sell out and become shills with below mediocre content. It's the circle of life.

>>33758307

Not to mention, they shill for freedom munitions which will explode your fucking gun because they are a shit tier ammo company with no qc. shame on those channels for endangering their viewers

>>33757301
stick with chrome lined barrels and pinned on gas blocks. mil-spec BCG HPT and MPI

>>33757798
maybe it was the XM16 with pencil profile barrel?

>>33757301
>t.noguns

>when everyone is so insecure they have to shit on what other people like to feel validated
Nothing new here, move along.

>>33757971
maybe with a heavy RPK barrel on a '74

File: 1489922121684.gif (4MB, 280x302px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 280x302px

>>33758307
>Has anyone noticed
No. Are there people who spy youtube comments?

>>33757883
Yeah, because putting out a fire is fucking difficult and you absolutely cannot hold the rifle by mag? Geez...

>>33758000
They don't do it to determine which is better, but to see what it takes to make the gun stop. They even say it themselves. It's the audience that uses these vids as tools to shit on each other like monkeys.

my main criteria for accessing the quality of a combat rifle/carbine is how well it functions as a squad automatic weapon.........