Up Close to America's $4 billion Stealth Destroyer, USS Zumwalt

>>33756196
where is it?

>>33756196
I like Zumwalt's look better than Arleigh Burke's.

File: Cx5IitZW8AAo_ov.jpg (110KB, 1133x584px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1133x584px

more like America's useless junk that broke down inside the panama canal and had to be towed out.

too bad they can't afford the ammo

>>33756220
Seriously. These are some nice landscapes but I want to see this destroyer everyone's talking about.

File: starfox-89.png (10KB, 256x224px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 256x224px

>>33756196
Pssh, that thing's easy to kill. Just shoot the turrets in the glowing spots when they turn to face you and then spam lasers at the command section when it comes off and starts spinning.

>>33756196
I see a hatch floating in midair. Is this normal? Do I have to go to an eye doctor?

>Destroyers design doesn't even eliminate radar pings, it just makes itself appear smaller
>Literally any navy will be fooled by a squadron of pings moving in formation that look the size of a yacht out in the middle of the sea

>>33756661
>I have no idea what I am talking about

>>33756661
>fishing boats are extremely uncommon in the fucking ocean

>>33756245
Fuck you for shitting on Repin.

Take your shitty shoop, stuff it in a cactus and stick it up your shit chute sideways you heathen fuck.

>>33756661
Smaller return, shorter distance required before can be picked up out of background/clutter, or forces the enemy to show their hand by making them use more power.

>>33756548
lul

File: 00045879.png (2MB, 1167x778px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1167x778px

>>33756196
Any idea what that is ?
Poor maintenance ?

>>33756196
My dad worked on this things power electronics. Apparently the navy, though they scrapped the Railgun project for it, the insides are all foreplayed up n ready. Fuckers spared some funding to integrate power recovery systems and voltage regulators into the ship's electrical grid in case a new gun (rail)gun system is developed to replace the AGS.

>>33757205
It has special anti radar coating, probably it falling off.

>>33757242
the sea be a harsh mistress

>>33756705
>>33756746
>>33756975
I have become aware that my previously voiced opinion was unfounded. I would like to apologize and I hope this misjudgment won't cause any further antagonism between me and the other anonymous users on this board.

>>33757205

>That fucking cable stapled on to the surface of your (((stealth))) ship.

Shartnik engineering at its finest.

File: XQwunlkh.jpg (68KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 800x450px

>ugly as sin
>Looks like a triangle
>Can't afford to fire it's cannon
>Class of one
What a waste of billions of dollars.

>>33756196

It's a cruiser in size, in doctrine, and in armaments. It's less of a destroyer than France's "frigates" are!

>>33757280
What? If you're trying to pretend you're the guy they're all responding to, you're not.

>>33760007
why do you have to be so hostile?

>>33760477
>>33757280

Out fucking played.

Interesting tactic.