Why?

>>33754455
sbr without paperwork

google advantages of an sbr

7.62x39 works well in shorter barrels

are u retard

Because sometimes you want a big pew in a little pew package

>>33754455
You can transport it as a "pistol" across state lines easier.

>>33754455
Why what?

>>33754465
But it seems too short.

>>33754500
>seems

same length as a krink

>>33754508
The barrel is only about 6", seems like the ballistics would be pretty shit at that point, and it'd just make a lot of noise.

>>33754465
implying you can shoulder a pistol

>>33754545
>doesnt read the news

yes you can now retard

google before u speak

theyve changed their mind at the atf

>>33754535
>seems
maybe you should do some actual research instead of just looking at something and feeling a certain way

File: 1486515759879.jpg (21KB, 427x427px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 427x427px

>>33754535
Are you implying that you don't want a massive fireball? Where the fuck do you think you are son?

https://www.sb-tactical.com/blog/sb-tactical-announces-reversal-atf-open-letter-use-sb-tactical-pistol-stabilizing-braces/

Saint Petersburg, Fla. (April, 25, 2017) – SB Tactical™, inventors and manufacturers of the Pistol Stabilizing Brace®, is excited to announce that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (BATFE) has issued SB Tactical a reversal letter containing a sensible clarification of the Bureau’s position on the lawful use of SB Tactical braces.

The new clarification of opinion letter states, “an NFA firearm has not necessarily been made when the device is not reconfigured for use as a shoulder stock – even if the attached firearm happens to be fired from the shoulder. To the extent that the January 2015 Open Letter implied or has been construed to hold that incidental, sporadic, or situational “use” of an arm-brace (in its original approved configuration) equipped firearm from a firing position at or near the shoulder was sufficient to constitute “redesign,” such interpretations are incorrect and not consistent with ATF’s interpretation of the statute or the manner in which it has historically been enforced.”

File: image.jpg (48KB, 960x478px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 960x478px

>>33754535
>No burning your targets with a basic fireball spell while also shooting them.
Where do you think you are?

>>33754545
Go to bed Thomas Brandon, you are drunk.

>>33754609
That's tomorrow though.

>>33754545
> At range with new ak pistol
> Wow it's mighty fun, just gotta eat a few more Cheetos
> Wish I had 5.45
> Need some code red to wash this cheese ball down
> Brace slips
> Hits shoulder
> In my surprise, I pull trigger as brace comes to rest against my shoulder (finger always on the trigger, just in case)
> Dear God what have I do-
> police Dogs charge in and attach themselfs to my limbs, I fall to the ground
> Atf agents storm the place, killing the dogs
> Thanks Mr law man
> Light me on fire and leave
Don't use a brace, it's a one way ticket. >>33754455
Also, why does that look like such dog shit? Not a draco or a papm92?

>>33755511
>>33755519
What the fuck IS it? Lethal and effective looking abortion

>>33754455
I can throw it in a bag and carry it legally in virginia

except mines a 300 blk ar

>>33755563
>>33754455


y'all realize that 2 hours ago the ATF changed their stance on arm braces, right?

They're once again legal to shoulder.

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2017/04/foghorn/atf-its-legal-to-shoulder-an-ar-15-pistol-equipped-with-an-sb-tactical-arm-brace/

>>33755631
as if this changes anything, everyone does it regardless of what the atf says

>>33754455
because it's still moving like 2200 fps

>>33754535
x39 does incredibly well out of short barrels
nearly identical to 300 blk

>>33754455
>bill of why

>>33755631
no shit!
did trump do that?

>>33755807
yep lol

>>33755631
>sb-tactical-arm-brace/
sb-tactical-arm-brace only

File: 0e0476ce89a638bd7edc484f3ecf05d1.jpg (93KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 1280x853px

>>33754455
Just get me one in .223, fit a .300 blk barrel to it and slide a can onto it. It will almost feel like pic related

>>33756773

>convert a .223 version of a rifle readily available in 7.62x39 to .300 blackout
that is the most assbackwards thing I think I've ever read. Why not just get it in 7.62x39 for practically identical ballistics and much more widely available ammo? If you want to handload and fuck with it, you could certainly do that with 7.62x39. You're seriously hurting my brain, stop.

>>33755586

seriously? Same as op picture. VZ 58. But in 5.56.

>>33754609
As a person that lives in St. Pete and works at an ffl, why did I not hear of this sooner?

>>33755586
vz58
>>33756773
You do realize that 7.62x39 and .300 blackout have nearly the same ballistics, right?

File: 1469825838758.jpg (92KB, 1080x810px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 1080x810px

>>33754545

File: 1243263738.jpg (214KB, 1136x851px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 1136x851px

because they're really fun to shoot

>>33756763
>To the extent that the January 2015 Open Letter implied or has been construed to hold that incidental, sporadic, or situational “use” of an arm-brace (in its original approved configuration) equipped firearm from a firing position at or near the shoulder was sufficient to constitute “redesign,” such interpretations are incorrect and not consistent with ATF’s interpretation of the statute or the manner in which it has historically been enforced.

>such interpretations are incorrect and not consistent with ATF’s interpretation of the statute or the manner in which it has historically been enforced.
>An arm-brace

>>33754535
You're retarded pls leave

>>33756773
Wtf

>>33756827
>>33756996
>Practically identical ballistics

What is this stupid meme? They are nothing alike.

>>33754545
>OMG! THE SIG BRACE IS LEGAL AGAIN - The Legal Brief!
>https://www.full30.com/video/753d3306cf7ce881109b35e62eb339e7

>Breaking News! ATF Says You Can Shoulder Your Arm Brace
https://www.full30.com/video/716b52d710f31f4048700643429ee572

>New ATF Ruling on SB Tactical Brace!
>https://www.full30.com/video/bc6aed2f06df198997faeece5377b6b4

File: Coulibaly.jpg (383KB, 1256x708px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 1256x708px

>Why?
For the glory of Allah, of course.