What ever happened to them??

>>33715616
they never made it into any video games so they were nixed

>>33715616
couldn't keep production costs down, or so I've heard

>>33715616
Vaporware at it's worst.

>>33715616
Hopefully he blew himself up and we never have to listen to his autistic arguments ever again

File: 16649333_10212065000450282_9210280790508374944_n.jpg (25KB, 593x625px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 593x625px

Preorders we're suppose to start this month. It doesn't look like that happened tho. They also changed the name to V3 Armaments. Last FB post was last month.

>>33715616
When he figured out that the parts actually cost money to produce, the expected cost went into basic bitch AR territory.

>>33715616
Redesign probably, the original design looks like pee pee and poo poo. Plus I dount he will be able to keep it under 100 bucks. It will probably be Sub 200. Shit wouldnt sell if its above that lmao

>>33715616
the guy who made the napkin drawing had no ability to actually produce it, and /k/ got tired of trying to help him since he would take any advice as a personal attack which after about 2 threads turned into people shitting on him and his retarded idea because it wasn't worth the time to try and help anymore.

>hey man cool gun design, how does it work?
>FUCK YOU

>>33715616
Delete this thread, before that autist shows up.

>>33715616
I wondered about this, kept seeing big promises and an expected release date, but never got anything solid.

Except, of course, that he had a genius design for an action that none of us would get to see until we bought it.

Didn't he also get banned from 4chan for advertising?

Brump

>>33715616
gibs backstory

looks like tubegun on cheap polymer frame. like a injection molded sten gun

don't understand, can someone provide back story?

>>33718983
Retard thought he could build guns in his garage for $50 a piece and slowly found out that things cost money.

>>33719024

that design looks pretty cool though lol

>>33719024
I could imagine that a rigged gun would cost around that to make. What was wrong with this idea (aside from the fact that he would need to pay his bills)?

File: 1487476752040.jpg (53KB, 545x720px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 545x720px

>>33715616
Dude was massivley underqualified and underestimating the costs involved. The steel this guy was planning on using was surgical steel, which sounds impressive, but isn't really suited for dealing with the stresses involved with firearms.

Dude was also very much against any sort of critcism from SMEs, even when they were pointing out simple fixes to design issues arising from the guy's complete lack of expertise in the fields he was dealing with.

Additionaly, the initial promises of "Under $100" were scrapped on first contact with reality, then began playing the name game. I think he was up to like $199.99 as a special price for preorders only and still claiming it wasn't $200.

TL;DR: Guy wasn't qualified, gun evolved into a low-quality alternative to existing products in the price range.