Weird Gun Concepts

>>33711463
>weird gun concepts
What if your gun was just a knife?

>>33711463
None; having mags attached to each other is far more viable and realistic. Even having 4 strapped to each other. Sure, the weight sucks, but it doesn't block your vision along the top

File: 2017-04-20 20_46_40-Pimp My Gun (beta).png (66KB, 1028x662px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1028x662px

hows ths 4 gun

File: DBR.png (26KB, 800x424px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 800x424px

how about a double barrel revolver.

File: 2017-04-20-19-00-40--1484945713.jpg (9KB, 352x142px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 352x142px

>>33711463
>rotating magazine

File: image.jpg (12KB, 200x151px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 200x151px

Is this your dream?

>>33711961
came to post this
>looseruth.png

>>33711544
That bipod almost gave me an aneurysm.

File: glock_cut_slide.png (31KB, 269x187px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 269x187px

>>33714276

File: charger_mu1.png (21KB, 351x97px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 351x97px

>>33714285

File: charger_mu2.png (19KB, 244x107px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 244x107px

>>33714293

File: gsr-1895.png (78KB, 740x364px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 740x364px

>>33714300

File: wiggle_bench.png (2KB, 601x156px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 601x156px

>>33714312

File: buffer_tube.png (5KB, 739x294px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 739x294px

>>33714319

File: bullpup_garand.png (9KB, 642x304px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 642x304px

>>33714324

File: F69267C8-BC8B-4F23-9FC6-144396F3E444-349-00000040F5AE5950.gif (2MB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 800x600px

>>33711463
I would use it to circumvent Californian magazine limits.

File: Uberti-1873-Cattleman-12-Shot-.22-LR-Caliber-Revolver.jpg (21KB, 600x446px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 600x446px

>>33711656
I actually think it could work.
>.22 mag
>DAO
>10 round cylinder with extra inner row
>Fires 2 shots at once until inner row runs dry
It'd be cheap, easy to use, and powerful.

>>33714324
Explain.

>>33714536
That one is just a way to use a rifle buffer tube on a pistol and keep the detent spring for the safety in the receiver with an end plate attached to the buttstock screw hole.

File: triple-barrel-revolver-27.jpg (16KB, 400x253px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 400x253px

>>33711656
>>33714536
Neva bin dun befo.

>>33711463
No, completely impossible. Revolvers were a daydream that was never realized because it just plain doesn't work.

And that's just handguns. It's just physically impossible to have any sort of revolving system in a long gun. Take for instance the M1216, which totally doesn't exist, because revolving magazines don't exist and you are the first person in history to draw up such a stupid idea in paint.

tl;dr revolvers will never work keep dreaming you dumb shit

File: 929awvroyfqy.png (1MB, 703x906px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 703x906px

>>33714594
I don't see the point of your post.

File: 5271793073_cb8a57318d.jpg (107KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 500x375px

>>33714723
Of all the posts in this thread, mine is the one you don't understand... Lurk more faggot.

File: 7142_ts.jpg (111KB, 1154x1154px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 1154x1154px

>>33711463
I guess I've been thinking about a gun accessory rather than a gun, but whatever. Revolvers are slow to load, speedloaders help but autos are of course way faster. What if you made a better speedloader? Put little notches on the edge of each hole in the cylinder for the loaders ejectors to fit into, and then when you position the loader you simply pull on it to simultaneously eject the old cartridges (they ramp out the sides to get out of the way of the new rounds), and add new ones.

>>33714752
Moon clips are a thing and are a common item for competition revolvers. They're a circular clip that holds the cartridges that is loaded whole into the chambers. It fits down into a groove machined into the face of the cylinder so all the brass ejects as one piece and fresh rounds are loaded as one piece. They're pretty nifty.

File: harry_potter.jpg (61KB, 347x595px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 347x595px

>>33714751
>I suggest that a modern .22 multi barreled revolver could be successful
>you imply I don't know that similar revolvers exist, for some reason
>this somehow makes me new

>>33714761
I know what they are, but they're only a little faster than regular speedloaders.

>>33714319
what?

>>33711656
Nero pls

>>33714752
The trouble with that would be positioning the speedloader quickly without bullets to guide it in place, and the open slots in the chambers causing weakness or ejection problems.

File: KillAMockingbird.jpg (70KB, 561x561px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 561x561px

>>33714723

Serious question, on a gas-piston gun you usually have a spot past the piston regulator for a vent port to allow excess gas to escape and not over pressurize the piston system.
On a short gun, like a handgun, would it be possible to integrate this into a silencer? Possibly with a sleeve, or even a proper integral silencer built around the barrel itself?
I believe something like this exists for the Beretta 92, though it's to capture gases released from the naked barrel not a gas piston system.

>>33718205
For what purpose? Vented gasses aren't loud or bright.

>>33718443
Just wondering if there's any reason the gas vent would need to be detached from the suppressor, I know the connection gives little direct benefit beyond keeping gasses off the hands depending on the vent port's location.

File: over barrel suppressor.jpg (66KB, 800x379px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 800x379px

>>33718605
Well one reason is that it'd have to be massive.

>>33718704
Right but I'm talking about on a handgun, not a long gun, and the piston in question wouldn't be working against a heavy slide spring

>>33718816
But gas operated handguns are a meme, I believe the only one in current production is the Deagle.

>>33718876
I only intend for the gas piston to operate an arm on a revolver, as an alternative to the usual trigger-actuated indexing system.
Basically a Nagant with a lever on the side that pushes/pulls the cylinder and indexes the next chamber, allowing for a gas seal lockup without the Nagant's shit trigger pull.

A little convoluted but would allow for effectively suppressed revolvers

File: nagant.png (582KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

582KB, 1920x1080px

>>33719035
The Nagant didn't have a shit trigger because of its gas sealing, poor design is to blame. Take out the cylinder and the trigger is still 20 pounds. So it sounds like you're wasting your time.

>>33719219
true, but either way the trigger is going to be heavier than normal if you have it actuate the cylinder's forward cam, and having a barrel that sits in a proper gas seal against the barrel will always be better for suppression.

File: IMG_1302.png (399KB, 1334x750px) Image search: [Google]

399KB, 1334x750px

>>33714276

File: IMG_1303.png (340KB, 1334x750px) Image search: [Google]

340KB, 1334x750px

>>33711463

File: IMG_1306.png (295KB, 1334x750px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 1334x750px

>>33719711
>not having a bipod on your bullpup shotgun

File: DBR.jpg (45KB, 851x408px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 851x408px

>>33714536
How about instead it's just firing from the top and bottom of the cylinder like pic related.

Would save a lot of weight and complexity.

So like five trigger pulls equating to 10 total shots of say .17 HMR

File: IMG_1307.png (295KB, 1334x750px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 1334x750px

I feel like firing this would be a fucking chore

>>33711544
who was buffer tube and gas tube

File: IMG_1310.jpg (79KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1024x768px

>KAC Chainsaw

>>33719358
>the trigger is going to be heavier than normal
Barely. The cylinder moves a few millimeters at most, pushed back by a weak spring.

>>33720026
Because having two hammers falling, or some massive double striker thing would be autistic, more complex, and bulkier than what I proposed.

>>33720307
Adding the extra row in the cylinder would also be extremely bulky.

Having to size up the cylinder to acommodate the extra rounds would be pretty heavy and also weird since you wouldn't have an equal number of shots fired.

You could probably fir six in the inner row, and having six doubles and four singles would be odd.

Though two hammers/a double striker probably wouldn't be very ideal either.

I think we're realizing why these type of guns didn't catch on.