Ruger Mark 4

>>33710321
Looks like the tactical has an attachment for a laser or flashlight.
And the lite has weight reduction up front in the way of those holes, and doesn't have the rail for a laser/light.

>>33710567
tactical also seems to have a threaded barrel for sure.

tactical has a rail and looks like a larger thread protector and weighs like 8oz more. lite has cuts in the receiver and also comes in bronze.

File: ff.png (160KB, 316x286px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 316x286px

Both are heavy as fuck what the hell?

seems they got rid of that PITA takedown lever.

Are the barrels the same in them?

>>33710730
go look at videos on how to disassemble the Mk.IVs they're easy as fuck now.

So witch on to buy?

>>33710577
Lite is threaded for 1/2x28, same with tactical

>>33711210
Do you want a super-quiet plinker/assassin weapon? Tacticool
Do you want a lightweight plinker that's slightly quieter than most handguns but still quite loud? Lite

>>33711210
Do you ever plan on putting a flashlight or a laser on a .22lr pistol? Choice should be obvious from there.

The lite weighs 8oz less because the bolt and barrel ride in an aluminum reciver, the tactical has a bottom rail and a steel receiver

I mean ruger has a spec sheet and feature list on the page man

>>33711276
No

>>33711293
Isn't a heavier one more accurate to shoot fast tho

>>33710321
The Tactical blends in with police gear, shadows, ninjas, my black soul, etc.

The Lite is designed for anal insertion by fags.