FIGHTER JET THREAD BRING YOUR A-10S F-16S AND RAPTORS (World

File: 421002.jpg (160KB, 1280x436px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 1280x436px

P-51 Mustang of course
crazy fucken technology for the time

>>33694335
>A-10
>fighter jet thread

What did he mean by this?

>>33694347
Are you claiming the a-10 isn't a fighter jet?

>>33694335
>fighter jet
>A-10S
>S

what

>>33694355
A fighter aircraft is a military aircraft designed primarily for air-to-air combat against other aircraft,[1] as opposed to bombers and attack aircraft, whose main mission is to attack ground targets. The hallmarks of a fighter are its speed, maneuverability, and small size relative to other combat aircraft.

>>33694363
I intended for this to be a general military aircraft thread
I wasn't expecting any more than for /k/ to jump on my ass for not checking my post, kek

>>33694372
>ho ho!
>I just wanted a shooty plane thread!
>Didn't think I had to bother properly defining aircraft....on /k/

It helps if you lurk for more than a week, child.

File: B-52 low over beach.jpg (36KB, 700x469px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 700x469px

>>33694347
BEST FIGHTER COMING THROUGH
BITCHES DON'T KNOW 'BOUT MY MIG KILLS

>>33694392
calm your autism nigger

>>33694456
>Getting basic facts right
>Autism

Go cry to mommy.

>>33694462
>i talk shit online because i have no real life

grow up manchild

File: wallpapers-rafale-dassault-aircraft.jpg (379KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 2560x1440px

>>33694335
There, have a jungle multirole instead.

File: 1364724209442.jpg (185KB, 1700x1356px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 1700x1356px

Full bays coming thru

>>33694335

Uh, I guess an A-10 would kick the ass of a Super Tuncano, so it /could/ be used as a fighter, but not a very good one.

File: 1364724285746.jpg (415KB, 2870x1913px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 2870x1913px

>>33694485

File: 1364724343420.jpg (769KB, 2000x1406px) Image search: [Google]

769KB, 2000x1406px

>>33694493

File: 1364724416074.jpg (413KB, 1728x1152px) Image search: [Google]

413KB, 1728x1152px

>>33694519
BRRRRRT

File: 1364728287382.jpg (323KB, 1600x1248px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 1600x1248px

>>33694526
(You)

File: 1338245132605.jpg (1MB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1680x1050px

>>33694535

File: 1322775525180.jpg (433KB, 1600x1063px) Image search: [Google]

433KB, 1600x1063px

>>33694545

>>33694448
That fucking angle of attack...

File: 1331201863719.jpg (2MB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1680x1050px

>>33694549

File: 1331042341701.jpg (218KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 2000x1333px

>>33694559

File: 1338029898845.jpg (225KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 1024x768px

>>33694563
WHHAAT are you doing here??

File: 1322686115626.jpg (165KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 1920x1200px

>>33694568

File: 1328865382727.jpg (336KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

336KB, 1024x768px

>>33694574

File: AH-1Z.jpg (65KB, 857x534px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 857x534px

>>33694574
Bring it on.

>>33694556
b52 has an extremely high angle of incidence, so it can actually fly at a fairly large negative angle of attack at higher speeds.

File: BLACK-HAWK-Boot-Camp-3.jpg (212KB, 930x500px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 930x500px

>>33694603
lol wut?

File: FairchildB52Crash.jpg (52KB, 682x520px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 682x520px

>>33694631
Like a fighter it handles not.

>>33694631

AOA is defined by the chord line vs the relative wind. Angle of incidence has nothing to do with it.

>>33694635
I see no air to air missiles on that toy. ;)

File: th.jpg (12KB, 305x204px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 305x204px

>>33694635

>"Hey guys! Let's have a thread about planes and shit!"

>"Uhh, x isn't y you know?"
>"Yeah! X isn't Y!"
>"This is why X isn't Y"
>"Doesn't this guy know x isn't y?"

Instead of just having a thread about jets

>>33694660

The USAF considers A-10 pilots fighter pilots.

>>33694670
There's an F in 117. So that's nice.

>>33694649
and thats where you are wrong, when talking about the aircraft as a whole the angle of attack is actually defined as the angle the fuselage makes with the airflow.

File: 2th.jpg (12KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 300x300px

>>33694660
this is now a full bays thread

>>33694676

That's angle of incidence.

>>33694675

All the F-117 drivers I know flew fighters before and after their Bandit time.

File: G-VTOL Farnborough.jpg (24KB, 310x398px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 310x398px

Vertical VTOL. Because you can.

>>33694689

Wait I read your post again. Angle of attack has always been defined as relative to the chord line, not the waterline to me in all my USAF aircrew academics.

File: 164c0b7f5a380b4224353d8a6ab5b1b9.jpg (70KB, 736x1139px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 736x1139px

>>33694688

File: 92-0019_004.jpg (46KB, 970x647px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 970x647px

>>33694701
guys shut up and post these bellies full of missles

File: 4563623.jpg (12KB, 400x307px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 400x307px

>>33694689
whatever dude

File: 1th.jpg (8KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 300x168px

>>33694704

File: 0053-02-1-3.jpg (69KB, 756x414px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 756x414px

Here shippy shippy, come to daddy.

File: QcFEv.jpg (337KB, 2035x3260px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 2035x3260px

FUCKING BORDERS
BUDDEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>33694695
>Vertical Vertical Take off and landing