Thread replies: 19
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
Anonymous
Ruger's explanation as to why there's no LC380S 2017-04-13 09:58:53 Post No. 33634681
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Ruger's explanation as to why there's no LC380S 2017-04-13 09:58:53 Post No. 33634681
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: vlcsnap-2015-10-18-21h35m50s253.png (919KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
919KB, 1280x720px
Ruger's explanation as to why there's no LC380S
Anonymous
2017-04-13 09:58:53
Post No. 33634681
[Report]
>Q: I really like the Ruger LC9s® Pro. I also like the Ruger LC380®. Can you tell me if Ruger has any plans to release a striker fired model of the LC380®?
>Striker-fired guns are typically "cock-on-close" and, as a result, they require a recoil spring that is substantially stronger than the striker spring so that they can compress (cock) that spring when returning the slide into battery (on close). But the 380 is not powerful enough to reliably compress a recoil spring that is also strong enough to overcome the striker spring. So 380 is not a great choice for cock-on-close striker mechanism. Long-term, we may work on a cock-on-open striker-fired mechanism to try to overcome this shortfall.
What the fuck are they talking about?
>>
>>33634681
It sounds better than "We don't want to"
>>
>>33634681
Ask them how that 380 flock worked.
>>
>>33635027
*glock
Fucking apple
>>
File: 1485010609323.jpg (125KB, 800x520px) Image search:
[Google]
125KB, 800x520px
>faggot numale crying because ruger won't make a single stack striker fire bitchgun
yawn, carry a real gun you faglord.
>>
>>33635027
Probably cock on open.
>>
Hammer fire is better anyway. The lc380 was just an upscaled model so I doubt they will take the time and money to engineer one with a limited market.
>>
>>33635027
Or the Diamondback... oh wait
>>
>>33635027
Glock strikers are partially cocked by pulling the trigger. The recoil spring would only have to partially cock the striker.
>>
>>33634681
are you a retard or something?
made perfect sense to me.
>>
>>33634681
I own a LCP380 and would buy the (((s))) if they made it.
>>
>>33634681
Doesn't this person do porn?
>>
>>33634681
>What the fuck are they talking about?
You might be retarded.
>>33635027
It has a larger, heavier slide which changes the spring rates required to make it work.
>>
>>33637947
Yeah, Camille Crimson, bonifide blowjob queen and cum junky. I have to wonder what's in that chocolate milk she's guzzling down.
>>
>>33637927
No such thing as an LCP380, but a second, now striker fired, version of the Ruger LCP (only available in .380) was recently released. It is called the Ruger LCP 2 and it is what you are looking for I believe.
>>
Ruger sucks my sr9 is rusting
>>
>>33640132
LCP II is not striker fired literal retard
>>
>>33640186
I apologize for my mental handicap; it is still hammer fired but now it is single-action with a 6lb pull vs double-action with a 10lb pull like my LCP.
>>
>>33639854
8/10 would fap to again.
Thanks anon
Thread posts: 19
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2