DNDOT thread

>>33631615
ask the ATF, send them a letter like everyone did about the arm braces.

Looks pretty angled to me, chief.
VFG on pistols aren't illegal anyway.
http://www.titleii.com/bardwell/us_v_davis2.txt

File: Blank_77f41c_6115887.jpg (57KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 800x800px

>>33631615

>>33631624

And risk ruining something for everyone else like the arm braces?

>>33631615
>>33631615
I would think the defining characteristic is whether you can wrap your thumb round it. That seems to be how they define it for """assault weapons""".

>>33631657

I could theoretically wrap my thumb around a magpul afg

>>33631665
And I can theoretically """redesign""" an """arm brace""" by touching it with my shoulder. I'm just telling you about the internal logic of the system, which is all that matters. You're asking for trouble by even talking that way.

>>33631705
yeah oh no the ATF is bugging /k/ so they know who to arrest for shouldering sig braces don't talk about it!! you'd only be prosecuted for it if you already commited a crime, otherwise it's just something I imagine range officers would get pissed about because DURR DA ATF SAID YOU CAN'T DO THAT!

>>33631633
Yep.

Which is why you should do it.

>>33631631
Explain

>>33631838
Nigger read the link

>>33631770
You sound upset. I can show you instances of people asking stupid questions and inviting further stupidity.

As proudly independent as gun owners claim to be, you sure go to a lot of trouble talking about being either law abiding or law rejecting, rather than just doing what you like in privacy. I am constantly annoyed at hobbyists using the 2nd Amendment to virtue signal, either in one way or the other.

>>33631631

Then why does everyone say that vertical foregrips aren't allowed?

>>33631911
>you sure go to a lot of trouble talking about being either law abiding or law rejecting, rather than just doing what you like in privacy.
The alternative is having your life ruined

>>33633740
Because that's what the ATF says.
The legal system said otherwise.

>>33633772
I absolutely agree. Which is why I would never ever do anything like that.
>>33633798
I think I saw some dogs over there, sir!

>>33633740
Because no one wants to spend the money to fight it out in court when the atf comes for them.

>>33631844
not other guy

ugh, i hate legal documents.

cliff notes plskthnx

>>33635411
>tl;dr VFG on pistols aren't illegal anyway.

>>33631633
What was ruined exactly?

>>33631615
it depends on whether or not any ATF agents feel like shooting your dog.

File: 20170212_141111.jpg (3MB, 4032x2268px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x2268px

Just do it.