What do you guys think is better for close/mid range combat, a low power scope or a red dot?
>>33620584
Depends. Home defense, red dot or true glow, but remember if its dark the light from the sights might fuck up target accusation, real combat go for the optics most firefights start 200 meters plus at least
>>33620617
So it's true, /k/ has become a clusterfuck of retards.
>>33620584
flashlight and irons clearly
>mfw i still remember the flashlight threads
>>33620584
Out to 300 metres, you should've fine with irons or a dot. Past that, a 1-6x will serve you well, at least on a fighting rifle.
>>33620617
>most firefights start 200 meters plus at least
But that's just fucking wrong.
>>33620617
Don't listen to this retard
>>33620617
t. half blind afghani 12 year old taking potshots at convoys on full auto
>>33620584
Nice thing about magnification is that it does make shooting a hell of a lot easier.
I learned to use the irons on top of the ACOG. They're acceptable for hitting mansized targets under 50 yards.
Ultimately, I decided not to be a poorfag and save up for a SpecterDR. Best of both worlds.
>>33620617
>most firefights start 200 meters plus at least
But that's objectively wrong you blithering idiot.
0-300 a red dot is fine for range and self defense, non military.
Its not fucking arma 3 or afghantistan where you'll be constantly shooting at people 300-700 yards away.
>>33620584
Red dots for 100 yards and under. Yeah they can be used past that but in my opinion a 3x or 4x scope would be a lot more versatile than a red dot in most cases like that and a lot more fun. except if your main concern is home defense then go with a red dot.