-Military that doesn't win wars
>>33573184
Couldn't you just run people over with those trucks? Checkmate.
POG.
>>33573546
If you were fighting a holy war.
>>33573546
>>33573565
>go to Iraq and Syria with trucks
>start running tons of people over with them, aided by proper tactical driving training that maximizes results
>terrorists are immediately brought down to their knees begging for peace
>>33573184
If you're fighting a war that requires logistics, you're fighting it too long, and are doing it poorly.
You're supposed to be in and out quickly.
>>33573755
Hitler, bls.
>>33573755
>war that requires more than 10 clips of ammo per soldier is too long
>>33573892
with the amount of weapons that use clips these days that sounds like a long ass war
>>33573755
So Iraq should've been two weeks shock and awe then all boots are out of country?
I wonder how that would've played out
>>33573184
It's been like the most banal thing since Punic Wars
>>33573755
In Sun Tzu's day maybe that was right, maybe for special operations that is right, but for conventional warfare in the modern era you're just being a retard.
>>33573565
kek
>>33573546
Warfare has evolved.
>>33574406
Out of my way, liberal fucking shits!
>>33573184
> A single component of a military is all you need.
Summer-fags git out.
Reeeeeeeeeeee
>>33573987
Probably just like how it ended up turning out anyways
>>33574029
It was never right. The oldest western story about war, Iliad, talks about how an army had to abandon a siege because they were running out of supplies. One of the oldest recorded battle, battle of Khadesh, was determined by logistics.
>>33573987
we should be left the day after we captured Hussein.
rebuilding the country was the mistake. make them do it and they will be too busy to do anything else.
>>33573755
This is why you fucked up operation Barbarossa, Adolf.
>>33576283
Rebuilding the country is why we went in there just ask dick Cheney
>>33576252
the illiad mentions no such thing
>>33576283
?
Why invade at all?
Because the jews wanted Saddam gone? Because the jews want a flood of "refugees" into Europe?
>>33576965
What is this revisionism? Fallout from 9/11 was the reason.
>>33577046
>What is this revisionism?
Revisionism? People were talking about this since 2003. Dick Cheney was CEO of Halliburton before becoming VP and Halliburton got a bunch of contracts for nation building in Iraq.
>fallout from 9/11
>let's go attack some sand niggers that had nothing to do with 9/11 because of 9/11
>>33573546
Adopt their ways
>>33577013
Did you forget the part where they almost had a mutiny?