Is it as great as it's touted to be?

>>33568595
it's better

>>33568595
It's pretty nice

>>33568595

They feel pretty good in the hand with all the different frame sizes. The trigger break feels kinda rubbery though.

File: 1490926602784.png (28KB, 285x285px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 285x285px

>>33568595
I prefer the CZ P10 myself

I thought this to be mine first pistol to buy.

Is it good to start with or...?

Have held some before, really like the grip on the fullsize and compact. I also liked the trigger - though it was nothing special.

Of course it's all a matter of preference, but that aside it's really just a new Glock. It's more than a dozen rounds of 9mm, it works, it's modular. What more could you want?

>>33568637
Ye, the P320 is a good pistol, imo I would buy something cheaper first but 500ish dollars for this quality of a pistol is a good deal imo

It's a poly striker 9mm. It's a great one of those.

>>33568661
Great, thanks!

>>33568637
Wait a year and buy the full-size CZ P-10. Cheaper, will almost certainly have superior ergos and trigger, will be able to max out at 21+1, all at the cost of ugly guts.

File: 320 x-five.jpg (35KB, 642x436px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 642x436px

did sig announce a release window for the 320 X-five?

>>33568823
Thx, I will check it out that too.

>>33568852

they should be in limited rate right now. they're probably going to trickle out to the general public over the summer, but .mil shooters have them.

>>33568595
It's ok but it's not as good as a 1911.

>>33568595
It's the same price as a Glock 19 but better in every way.

If you buy a the compact version, you can buy a subcompact frame for like $50 and essentially make it into a different gun.