[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Nevada Senate Bill 254

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 3

File: Not sitting on a couch.png (404KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]
Not sitting on a couch.png
404KB, 480x480px
https://www.firearmspolicy.org/urgent_new_nevada_bill_allows_home_invaders_to_sue_you_if_you_shoot_them

>A man’s home is his castle, or so the saying goes. And people should be able to protect their homes - including our most precious asset, our families - against intruders without fear of a lawsuit.
>Some Nevada politicians are trying to change that. They think that you should be financially liable for any injuries they sustain when you defend yourself -- even in your home.
>Does that sound convoluted? It is. And, it’s ridiculous. If someone is invading your home, the last thing you should be thinking about is being sued if you use force to defend yourself or your family.
>Senate Bill 254 removes the provision in Nevada law protecting people from civil liability when they justifiably use potentially deadly force against a person who is injured or killed while invading their home.
>We need YOU to tell them, “I have a right to defend myself against criminals!”
>Senators, here’s a thought: Actions have consequences. When a criminal decides to invade someone else’s property, they just might get hurt or killed as a result - and the criminal’s the only one to blame.
>Contact your legislators today and tell them you oppose this attempt to value the rights of criminals over the rights of law abiding gun owners.
>>
>>33550615
Always shoot to kill. Got it.
>>
>>33550630
Their family will sue you, but at least it still works as a deterrent.
>>
So who's pushing for this faggotry and what's their reasoning?
>>
>By: (Bolded name indicates primary sponsorship)
>Ford,
Democrat Black from Vegas
> Atkinson
Democrat Black and gay
> Spearman
Democrat, lesbian, vegas, doesn't look white
> Denis
Democrat, cuban, Rubio's black cousin
> Cancela
Democrat cuban woman
> Cannizzaro
Democrat, woman, looks to be at least 200lbs
> Manendo
democrat, vegas
> Parks
democrat, vegas
> Ratti
democrat, woman
> Woodhouse
Democrat, woman
> Frierson, McCurdy II, Neal, Thompson, Carrillo, Flores, Jauregui, Miller, Monroe-Moreno

Can you guess the political party of every one of these assemblymen?

Why do the democrats support crime so much?
>>
>>33550659
>who's pushing this
Either a woman or a certain (((group)))
>why?
Probably the Oklahoma home defense case
>>
>>33550666
Because AYO FUCK WHITE PEPOL WE BE KANGZ NIGGUH
>>
People living in Nevada can afford homes? Huh. Well, either way, I suspect Sandoval isn't signing this shit, assuming they can even get other Dems to vote yes.
>>
It's a fucking life-insurance policy for criminals, lmao.
>>
File: UncleTed.jpg (134KB, 652x755px) Image search: [Google]
UncleTed.jpg
134KB, 652x755px
>>33550659
>>33550666 checked
>>33550669
SURPRISE!!!!!! SURPRISE!!!!!! GOY!!!
>>
>>33550800

http://jpfo.org/

fuck off stormcuck
>>
>>33550850
>>33550800
>CTR desperately falseflagging
How long are those checks gonna clear m8?
>>
File: lane.jpg (2MB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]
lane.jpg
2MB, 1280x1024px
>>33550984
No faggot. We just aren't staying in our box anymore.
>>
>>33550984

What you're doing is actually false flagging. You're calling something false flagging that obviously isn't false flagging.


Either you're stupid or doing your own counter intel. Most likely the former so let me explain it to you.

Those graphs make sense. Liberals and leftists wouldn't like those graphs depicting the truth about (((who))) is behind gun control. That can't be a false flag because it doesn't make "the alt right Nazis" Look bad in any way shape or form.
>>
>>33550615

Man I'm glad I left East California for Texas 12 years ago.
>>
Dead criminals can't into court
>>
>>33550984
Why was one of these jpg deleted?
Thread posts: 17
Thread images: 3


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.