Are there bullets that are undetectable by an X-ray. Do they

>>33546582
Then get a heavy ass bullet made of lead.

>>33546582
yea a weapons developer will specifically try to make a product that they can't sell to anyone...

hint, xray undetectable bullets have no market, they are illegal in international law.

>>33546636
>international law

Hahahahahahahhahahahahah oh wow

>>33546582

You don't own guns

File: 1458272462879.jpg (128KB, 800x361px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 800x361px

>>33546582
you must not have been around for the acrylic bullet thread.

File: image.jpg (43KB, 580x384px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 580x384px

>>33546699
>I call them pretty projectiles

>>33546582
I don't even understand what such a bullet would accomplish. Are you 12?

File: 1486529986819.jpg (42KB, 436x361px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 436x361px

>>33546582
>undetectable by an X-ray
>home defense scenario
WDHMBT

>>33546582
>Are there bullets that are undetectable by an X-ray.
Theoretically, but you're going to have to have everything have roughly the density of air...

>>33546582
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2014/03/25/pcp-polymer-cased-ammo-warning/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCjNkbxHkEE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S13_0pGvZ4w

>>33546636
>they are illegal in international law
lmao no

>>33547159
There aren't x-ray transparent materials. The best you can do is mask using density and depth.

>>33546636
>PolyCase Bullets — Injection-Molded Blend of Copper and Plastic
>Non detectable by x-ray
Nope.

>>33547031
Sometimes the best home defense is a pre-emptive attack upon your neighbors.

the hard part isnt the boolit but the case. brass is really fucking good at what it does.

>>33546636

>illegal in international law

Get a load of this faggot

Just get a crossbow and shoot ice icicles.

>>33546636
he isn't wrong you fucks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_Certain_Conventional_Weapons

File: 1490591510677.jpg (31KB, 640x287px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 640x287px

>>33546582

>>33546582
Hmm...

Your pic takes care of the case problem, then you need ceramic bullets. I wonder if tungsten carbide sets off a metal detector? It looks like metal, but it's technically a ceramic matrix.

>>33547457
that's about land mines and shit. do you read your fucking links?

File: 1490340764298.jpg (42KB, 500x280px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 500x280px

Has anyone really been far as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

File: Mccopinz.jpg (13KB, 313x330px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 313x330px

>>33549710

File: 20160126_LAUGHINGimage.jpg (295KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 1920x1080px

>>33546636
>illegal in international law

>>33547457
There's literally nothing in that about ammunition undetectable via xray machine. Learn to read, nigger.

>>33549654
>>33550139
>Protocol I on Non-Detectable Fragments prohibits the use of any weapon the primary effect of which is to injure by fragments which are not detectable in human body by X-rays. The reason is that such fragments are difficult to remove and cause unnecessary suffering. The protocol applies when the "primary effect" is to injure by non-detectable fragments and does not prohibit all use of e.g. plastic in weapons design.

Good luck convincing the tribunal that your ammunition isn't a weapon designed to injure with non-detectable fragments

>>33550385
Goddammit, you're stupid. That prohibits use of said ammunition in war, not manufacture, sale or possession. It's the same thing with tear gas, we can't use it in war because it's a chemical weapon but it's perfectly fine to use on protestors.

LEARN. TO. READ.

>>33546582
Fuck off ISIS

>>33550392
So sales to police agencies and civilians will completely pay for the research and development costs?

Is there some sort of hidden market demand for radio-translucent ammunition I'm not seeing?

>>33550385

lol its a metal bullet and plastic case

>>33546582
OP is a massive faggot.

>>33550403
That wasn't your original point, faggot. You made a retarded claim that it was banned by international law, and you've been proven wrong so now you're trying to deflect to save face.

>Not firing acrylic bullets out of your Glock 7 in the terminal of Dulles International on Christmas Eve

Most people on this board probably can't afford these rounds anyway, they cost more than what these NEETs get in pocket money a year.

>>33547244
>sometimes

>>33550516
Actually his point is that there won't be any research in them because nobody will get them since they're prohibited, read his first post.

Btw that law only applies to 5.56 since it is designed to wound, while real fucking NATO is born to kill.

>>33550894
Nice troll, made me reply more than once. 5/10.