Recommend Cool Rifles

ptr 91s are p. cool

FAL voyager is definitely what I'd get. If you can pony up for it, the para's may tickle your pickle.

WHY THE FUCK DO I HAVE TO DO 2 CAPTCHAS EVERY MOTHER FUCKING TIME YOU PIECE OF SHIT BOARD

>>33512595
>FAL voyager
I heard those were trash, but I can't remember why. Anyone know?

File: IMG_20170324_102139.jpg (222KB, 476x1239px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 476x1239px

>>33512288
I like mine.

>>33512626
Cast receiver if I recall.

>>33512682
Yeah I just got rid of a shitty gun with a bunch of cast parts, I love FAL pattern rifles but maybe not a voyager

>>33512288
I own one, good rifle. I bought a ton of ammo I can't shoot at my range, so it kind of collects dust.

No issues outside of shitty mexican ammo I bought at the range.
In all honesty though I contemplate selling it, but thats just because all my local ranges are indoors.

Thinking of an SVT40 or some sort of semi auto WW2 rifle too

If you want a precision .308 military-pattern, get a PTR. The rest of them have inherent accuracy issues and a PTR is cheap anyway. And this is from a guy who just bought a Polytech M14, but that's just because I love M14s so much.

Not OP, but I figure this is a good place to ask. Do any of you guys own a Century C308? What are your thoughts? They're incredibly cheap for a battle rifle. Are they half decent?

>>33512966
No they're fucking awful. They're made out of pot metal that literally separates from the receiver from firing, cracks, shitty spot welds. They fucking slam fire too.

>>33513040
Which parts are pot metal? I thought they were made from Spanish parts kits and new PTR parts.

>>33512288

I suggest something that has accessories and cheap mags.

File: 3Slj9cO.jpg (64KB, 750x600px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 750x600px

>>33512966
>century arms reminder

>>33512626
>>33512682

Cast receiver is why people dislike the Voyager. I've had mine for years now and haven't had an issue. And to be honest, if you shoot enough .308 to where a properly cast receiver fails, you could have easily been able to afford a forged receiver.

>>33513271
He man, if you have a thousand monkeys working on a thousand work stations, soon they'll build the greatest battle rifle ever made!

File: IMG-984549512.jpg (204KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 960x540px

>>33512288
I'm a taller guy (6'3'') and I LOVE my ptr, but i really dislike shouldering it to use the iron sights. Buy a cheek riser and prism scope.

>>33513297
That's a shame. I just sold a C39V1 for $800 and I'm avoiding cast shit like the plague, it haunted me from that gun.

>>33512966
>average of 5 MOA

>>33516784
Would a PTR do better?

>>33516799
A lot.
The build quality will just be way better in general.

Rule of thumb with Century is that anything they themselves have built from the ground up, you should probably avoid, like their RAS47 or C308.

What they can do is swap parts on imported WASRs and Zastavas for 922r compliance as well as mill out the gimped magwell so it takes normal mags, they've learned how to do this without fucking it up.