Any of you richfags planning on getting an APC 223? Probably

File: 1488787448108.png (362KB, 640x481px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 640x481px

>>33507876
>ar
>canada

>>33507876
I really want to play around with one. There aren't any B&T dealers around me so I'm going to have to go hunting. How much are they projected to go for in syrupland? They're like $2800 USD if I'm not mistaken.

>>33507876
Thinking about starting a new rifle, that might fit the bill. What makes so sexy?

>>33507891

>implying we dont have ARs

K

>>33507901

>swiss
>shoots 1MOA even from 8" barrel
>piston
>swiss
>swiss
>swiss

>>33507921
Oh. That's all.
Short barrels aren't less accurate, so 1moa, while good, isn't impressive. And the Swiss, while excellent technically, have no sense of aesthetic.

>>33507876
The APC223 is much cheaper than the SIG 550. It's in the same range as the Beretta ARX-160, CZ-805 and Tavor.

>>33508024

3900 canadian is only 300 less than a 550.

Tavors are 2600.

>>33507955

>short barrels arent less accurate


.......what

>>33507892
>>33508024
I work for a B&T dealer, and the APC223 pistol is at least $2500 cost. I forgot the exact price and don't have the pricing document available, but it's not going to be cheap. The APC9/45 are already roughly 1700/1850 cost.

>>33508217
Short barrels are actually more accurate than a longer barrel with the same profile. The only thing barrel length affects is velocity, and that's only when you can't select a propellant that will overcome that.

>>33508242
>the only thing barrel length affects is velocity
How does something affect velocity but not accuracy?

>>33508405
Because as long as it's fast enough to stabilize, it'll be just as accurate and something faster.

>>33508405
pretty much the only time velocity seriously affects accuracy is when the bullet exits supersonic flight. A shorter barrel will reduce the range at which you can be accurate, but within that range a short barrel will be more accurate than a long one because it is more rigid.

>>33508480
But with a longer barrel you get higher velocities which means better accuracy at longer ranges.

>>33508485
>the only time velocity seriously affects accuracy is when the bullet exits supersonic flight. A shorter barrel will reduce the range at which you can be accurate
You see, we're saying the same thing but you don't seem to think it hurts your argument.

>a short barrel will be more accurate than a long one because it is more rigid
It can be more rigid. There are plenty of thicc barrels that counter that problem well.

>>33508585
>But with a longer barrel you get higher velocities which means better accuracy at longer ranges.
This discussion is not about external ballistics. Dealing with transsonic flight is a bullet issue more than a barrel issue.
>It can be more rigid. There are plenty of thicc barrels that counter that problem well
Compare like to like. The barrels would have to be the same profile.

>>33507876
Gee, yet another SCAR knockoff. Guess why no one in the world, not even the Swiss, want this?

>>33507876
>Any of you richfags planning on getting an APC 223?
That thing looks like a knockoff of AK-12.

>>33509147
Because it costs even more than a SCAR?