/k/ube has granted you voucher for one tank of your choice

File: jagdpanther_01_of_12.jpg (293KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 1600x1200px

>>33495480
Also forgott to add that tank destroyers are also OK.

File: MBT70.webm (3MB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x360px

Load up them Shillelaghs boys.

File: 2HH3DG1.png (294KB, 767x332px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 767x332px

>>33495480
I'm also assuming the /k/ube is granting me robo-crew as well. a tank is worthless without crew.
in this case, I choose;
>M103A2
reasoning
>giant fuck of a tank
>built for commie removal
>last of the heavies
>never saw combat, needs testing
>could reasonably stand up to modern weapons other than the newest of the new tanks
>could dish out equivalent punishment as it could take
>reasonably fast
>aesthetic as fuck

>>33495480
Bob Semple tank

File: image.png (730KB, 900x597px) Image search: [Google]

730KB, 900x597px

>>33495480
Stug iv
No other tank in history has managed to be as aesthetic as this bastard

File: Panther_ausf_G_France_1944_8.jpg (43KB, 800x546px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 800x546px

>>33495480
Panther aus G
>most issues already fixed
>fast enough to be used as everyday city vehicle
>A S T H E T I C
>75mm gun is perfect
>not to weak to be just oversied plinker
>not to big to take half a day to load
>just enough to fuck things up and load up nicely
>not many Panthers in working condionts so i could go to so military events and let people ride for free since i'd have unlimited fuel and ammo
I'd probably paint in ambush scheme.
OR i'd take king tiger or jagd tiger since there is only one working King Tiger in the whole world and no working jagd tigers.

KV-6.
Because if a KV-6 wont do the job, nothing will.

File: Object_279-4.jpg (78KB, 699x510px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 699x510px

Aw fukken yiss

Confuse people into thinking some crazy alien ufo tank has arrived

File: 1405438102826.jpg (4MB, 4288x2848px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4288x2848px

Wiesel 2 in mortar configuration.

(I'd even settle for a Wiesel 2 in scout/observer config or resupply config though)

It's at least something you could legally drive around with rubber road tracks. Good luck actually using other tanks.

File: d980ed4d4f6f94de.jpg (772KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

772KB, 1024x768px

>>33495674

And before people die of laughter, no a 120mm mortar aint no fucking joke.
Shoot & scoot, nigger, shot & scoot!

Pic: stoppies work too with Wiesels.

File: Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-299-1805-10,_Nordfrankreich,_Panzer_VI_(Tiger_I).jpg (66KB, 797x512px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 797x512px

>>33495480
Tiger I, which I will then rent to fucking everybody and made mad money for more guns

File: FT NC1.jpg (189KB, 1024x664px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 1024x664px

>>33495480

She might not be the fastest or strongest or even the most comfortable, but the Renault FT is my tankfu. Given that I'm allowed any variation that actually made it to prototype stage, I chose the FT NC1 with its improved suspension and engine allowing it to move at around- 11.5 miles per hour, which is still over twice as fast as a standard FT.

Probably something smaller like an M3 Stuart or a Renault FT so its not a nightmare to park and i dont need to extend my garage all that much

File: image.jpg (33KB, 500x316px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 500x316px

I'd like a StuG III G variant with the short barreled howitzer of earlier models.

Fast, light, sexy as fuck.

Stug vs modern tank with long barreled gun would never stand a chance in modern combat, but with a short barreled howitzer it could still be an effective piece if I ever was forced to use it.

Hellcat with the 90mm gun.
I'd DD the shit out of it.

The Char or the Maus please so I can live comfy in it.

>>33495560
>most issues already fixed

too bad that didn't include the final drive gears

File: 4697251347_93ebeed2b6.jpg (164KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 500x333px

Does this also applies to scout armored vehicles?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrvXTIT2yJ0

File: Black_Prince_tank_side_view.jpg (247KB, 800x508px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 800x508px

Tank, Infantry, Black Prince (A43) for me

I was going to say baneblade until I read the rules. So I'll settle for a M2 Bradley so I can use it like a car while having access to TOW missiles.

File: Iog8XnKSwI8.jpg (253KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 1280x853px

As the latest hotness in tank technology I'm pretty sure it should fetch a nice price.

>>33495674
Rules are that you can drive your tonk on normal roads without issure, read the OP, you could even want a maus and it'd still be okay to drive around your town (not that you could manouver that thing but you still could)

>>33496376

permission doesn't mean it doesn't do any damage though. ;)

File: m60.jpg (45KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 640x427px

M60, purely for nostalgia.

File: 1485623325340.png (228KB, 624x480px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 624x480px

>>33495480
>not getting to built your own tonk

thx kube for the offer but it's not what I want....

File: 1407481730392.jpg (702KB, 1848x1224px) Image search: [Google]

702KB, 1848x1224px

my little ELC. Now we just see what the biggest possible engine to get in is. LS? 572?

File: 931cf77e611030b34145c9b97602ed99.jpg (51KB, 700x422px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 700x422px

So many options...fuck.
I'd say an object 757. Drive that shit everywhere. If the city had a riot I wouldn't even care. No groups stopping me from my errands

File: stingray.jpg (110KB, 800x550px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 800x550px

Stingray light tank

File: 1234123412.jpg (94KB, 800x506px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 800x506px

I didn't choose the StuG life, the StuG life chose me

lol tog 2

File: object 757.jpg (3MB, 2250x1500px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2250x1500px

>>33496845
Didn't know this exists. Looks aesthetic as fuck.

File: S1z5Zge.jpg (46KB, 630x420px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 630x420px

Factory fresh M1

File: Aureole Schell Jagdpanzer SchKII.jpg (191KB, 800x291px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 800x291px

If only it wasn't a prototype I would have said the Aureole, because jet tank why not

Gimi a leo2 a7

DARPA probably has some kind of tank mounted with the marauder system deep in their underground lair, so I'll take one of those. If not one Karl Gustav plz /k/ube

File: S.jpg (997KB, 3600x2160px) Image search: [Google]

997KB, 3600x2160px

>>33496946
that has been a thing since the 60s

>>33496912
They still make new ones?

>>33496954
Yeah, but this is german dual jet engine prototype tank we're talking about

bolo mk 34

>>33496978
well, that one has two engines

>>33496954
that's not a tank, that's a TD.

>>33497030
wot pls go. It is an MBT, even if it looks like a TD

>>33496965
not brand new afaik, but they're churning out full conversion rebuilds like there's no tomorrow
anyone have the figure for when the whole fleet will be A2-SEPv3s? late this year?

>>33495480
>permtion
I weep for my country

>>33497034
>no turret
>low to the ground

I'm genuinely curious. What makes it a MBT?

>>33496908
Shoots missiles too

>>33497058
the way the börks classified it. Like how the panter was a medium, dpesite being as heavy as an IS tank

>>33497073
huh, learned something new today. Thanks.

>>33497094
>>33497073
>>33497058
Isn't it universal that tank has a rotating turret whereas tank destroter has fixed gun?

>>33497103
not at all, see hellcat and jackson TDs

>>33495560
>implying 50mm is a plinking round
Shiiieet. I want to know you anon

>biblically

>>33497117
I know that hellcat has turret but it's open turret. Still not tank turret as tanks is something that has closed turret.

File: The_British_Army_in_Italy_1945_NA22387.jpg (80KB, 800x792px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 800x792px

Damn, this overall is a really hard choice.

I mean, if i want something I can go pick up my groceries with, I might want an M3 GMC. It's TD half-track the size of a pickup truck with a 75mm gun. Something cool to show around.

Or I could get a Russian T-14 Armada and sell it to the US Government.

Or I could get a T-90A just for the looks and aesthetics.

>>33497123
75, not 50

>>33496954
Why do they bolt that main cannon down with those big metal things?

Why have a gun with no elevation?

>>33495838
so a loli tankfu?

>>33497223
Gun is fixed directly to the chassis. It aims the gun with the suspension

>>33497223
it can elevate by using the suspension.

>>33497223
>>33497244
Here's a very low quality video of it using said suspension
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gf1OyrNKDLg

File: Squatchwalk_multicam__48989.jpg (296KB, 1280x889px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 1280x889px

>>33495480
>What do you choose and why?

Whatever tank or armored vehicle has the most interior room, because samsquantch needs a lot of fucking space to ride in things.

>>33497272
>>33497244
>>33497239

Thanks gents

File: AntonovA40.jpg (22KB, 513x293px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 513x293px

>>33495480
Make way for best tankfu

File: 1445901107399.jpg (89KB, 679x657px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 679x657px

>>33497345
How the hell was that thing even supposed to work?

>>33497457
They took all the armor off and downsized the gun until it was practically useless

File: 7070e6c8ddbc20fcc24e0476d4574c99.jpg (70KB, 700x427px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 700x427px

Though I have no personal experience with it the CV90120-T has always appealed to me for some reason. Light weight, sleek lines, hits above its weight class, capable of being uparmored and if you're fielding a military, parts commonality with a variety of IFV, mortar launchers, APCs and AA vehicles that use the same chasis. Ideal for the state on an efficient budget.

Panzer III

File: 1280px-Panzerkampfwagen_III_(2).jpg (209KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 1280x960px

>>33497505
But which model? There's a ton of different upgrades. I would personally recommend the L model.

File: M2_Bradley_08.jpg (126KB, 1024x782px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1024x782px

Based on the rules I would have to stick with the M2. Just because it would be the most practical.

However, if you took away that
>you CAN'T do any modifications, all parts are stock
part, I think I would absolutely love to go wild with modernizing old school tanks.

Not that they would be particularly good or anything once you were all done, but it would be a fascinating "what if" of fappery.

For instance, imagine taking something like >>33496194
(Black Prince) and putting a modern FCS on the 17 pounder, uprating the engine (almost guaranteed there is something out there with better power in a smaller package by now), adding some sloped applique to the turret, and sticking ERA on it. It would certainly look beastly, at the very least!

File: Scimitar-Bovington.jpg (403KB, 939x724px) Image search: [Google]

403KB, 939x724px

I'll take one FV107 Scimitar please.

practical and fun.

>>33495480
The Japanese made Renault Otsu. Because fuck traffic, I'm going to move at 15km/h

File: T28 Super Heavy.jpg (68KB, 1024x575px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 1024x575px

>>33495480
I always thought the T28 was fucking cool looking.
On paper and practicality, its really not great aside from massive armour and big gun, rest is quite rubbish.

File: B1Bis.jpg (324KB, 1068x801px) Image search: [Google]

324KB, 1068x801px

>>33495480
Comfy French tonk.

File: starships.jpg (186KB, 1600x1044px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 1600x1044px

M60A2

File: IMG_3642.jpg (162KB, 721x561px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 721x561px

M 1 abrams called thumper with prototype 140mm gun with auto loader

File: Sep 17 004.jpg (813KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

813KB, 1600x1200px

I live in a condo so I'll take a scout pls

File: 1485790035441.jpg (3MB, 3200x1800px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3200x1800px

An M109A7

Just look at that sexy turret on the top

>>33495480
If it's going to continue to live a normal life, an M18 Hellcat.

If I'm going to live the /k/ommando dream of a tank-for-fire mercenary, gimme a Merkava MkIV with the Trophy APS.

File: M1 unmanned turret w increased hull armor.jpg (162KB, 873x678px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 873x678px

>>33495480
Abrams with an unmanned turret. ez

>>33495480
Holy shit!!! Where can I turn this in and get the tank!!!??

File: Screenshot_299.png (306KB, 433x420px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 433x420px

>>33495480
Hetzer chan is the only answer. So cute.

>>33495641
Why was this tank designed this way?

>>33498559
Drives by in abrams up armored with 140mm gun opens hatch.
Its so cute its coming home with me.
Straps tow cable to hetzer.

>>33498595
nuke proof

>>33498432
yes anon, that's one sexy lookin' bitch.
its also a self propelled howitzer, not a fuggin tank.
im not splitting hairs or spergin' out, but there is a huge difference between the two.

>>33498604
Yep that monster could survive a 200 kiloton nuke at 50 meters ...

>>33498615
Hey if it can do direct fire its just a tank with really light armor..

File: BMPT-72-6-1024x682.jpg (168KB, 1024x682px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 1024x682px

BMPT Terminator is just what i need

>>33495556
But anon that's a stug iii

>>33497272
>Can't fire accurately on the move
>has to turn the entire tank even just a fraction of an inch in order to aim the gun
Tell me again how this is a good idea?

File: KV-VI (2).jpg (982KB, 1400x990px) Image search: [Google]

982KB, 1400x990px

>Dmitri, yuo cannot be bringings of whole armory of tank with!
>thast where yuo are wrong, sasha

>>33498695
doesn't matter much when it's used as a defensive piece

File: d.jpg (3MB, 4059x2706px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4059x2706px

>>33498631
i have done direct fire with towed 155(has wheels), but NEVER considered it a tank.

>>33498740
storytime, faggot

File: M1CATTB2.jpg (123KB, 900x509px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 900x509px

>>33495480
The Thumper Abrams or >>33495496 just for the novelty of having a 152mm gun/missile launcher.

>>33498792
nailed tonk 1500 meters away.
noticed baby fist size piece of shrapnel sizzling on the ground beside me.

>>33498634
It actually looks like it's searching for John Connor.

File: ChieftainMBT_MkX_Bovington.jpg (380KB, 900x496px) Image search: [Google]

380KB, 900x496px

Chieftain MkXI (I know my pic says MkX), 12 friends, and a truck of HESH and off to Africa, Syria or Ukraine to live the life of armored Merc.

File: leo2a6_3.jpg (1MB, 4340x1691px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4340x1691px

The Leopard 2A6
Y'all like unsourced ctrl+c ctrl+v?
>One of the best main battle tanks in the world. The Leopard 2A6 outperforms the M1A2 Abrams, Challenger 2 and Leclerc in terms of protection, firepower and mobility.

>>33495743
>
This man gets it.

File: lol253.jpg (75KB, 735x488px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 735x488px

>meep meep

>>33500889
shit post

File: semple.jpg (85KB, 700x537px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 700x537px

Bob Semple tank.

I'll fucking destroy each and every single one of you, and crush your flaming wrecks beneath my mighty treads. I'll fuck the shit out of your wife inside this tank and blow up your house after. I don't give a fuck. I will destroy ISIS with just one Bob Semple tank. Freedom-ah freedom-ah freedom-ah Gahbless the U-S-A

>>33496978
I hope you realise that all those tanks in Panzer front were made up, right?

File: metropolitan-carriage-and-waggon-mark-iv-06.jpg (28KB, 650x332px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 650x332px

Does this count?

>We Twisted Metal now

File: E-100_Chassis_and_Spaced_Armor.jpg (2MB, 1396x4904px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1396x4904px

>>33495480
Does a partially constructed prototype count?
Because an E-100 would be pretty dope

File: A_column_of_Churchill_tanks_and_other_vehicles_at_the_start_of_Operation_'Veritable',_NW_Europe,_8_February_1945._BU1767.jpg (312KB, 2480x1582px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 2480x1582px

A Churchill Tank of some sort.

Either IV, V, VI, VII or VIII. Not sure which I like most. Probably the VI.

>>33498695
sloped armor like a motherfucker, no gun mantlet to hit, no bullshit sticking out the top

>>33501671
Been fantasizing about the E series lately.
What if man... what if ;_;
I'd have loved at least one to have reported combat performance

>>33504164
It would've travelled 5km before getting bogged down, then swarmed by Soviet infantry because >lol no mg port.

File: Schwerer_Gustav_Rail_Cannon.jpg (263KB, 1400x900px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 1400x900px

Is this a tank?

File: mah nigga1.jpg (26KB, 446x336px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 446x336px

>>33496682
If for no other reason than that all my green army man tanks were M60s, this.

>>33504271
It's clearly a train

>>33504271
No, it was a waste of time, resources and manpower

>>33504235
Probably, maybe the e-50 instead would have been more interesting / agile but you could probably just look at the panther

>>33497894
Hon Hon Hon

>>33498703
So you blow the tracks and you've effectively stopped like 6 tanks

File: k22.jpg (371KB, 1000x793px) Image search: [Google]

371KB, 1000x793px

where my Black Panther boys at?

File: monster_tank.jpg (22KB, 380x290px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 380x290px

>>33504271
No.

Try this instead.

>800mm self propelled land battleship

>>33505890
W..w..well OP did say you had u-unlimited fuel f-for it.

>>33506251
>unlimited fuel, parts, ammo, and support crew.

I'm not the only guy thinking of dismantling one and literally building unlimited tanks using the infinite supply of tank parts I now have.

File: 1487008201713m.jpg (128KB, 1024x713px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1024x713px

Mark IV. I would own the only authentic one.

File: 107541-10000-pristine.jpg (63KB, 640x418px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 640x418px

>>33495480
M51 Super Sherman

>>33495480

I'll take one of those experimental CV90s with a laser scanner that reads ground topography and the adjusts suspension to match on the fly. Supposedly an up to 40% increase in offroad speed, and most likely a 100% increase in general comfort.

>>33497103
A Mark II is still a tank.

>>33498617
Absolutely not.

>>33495480
The Ratte

File: 235563636.jpg (3MB, 2492x1589px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2492x1589px

BMP2
>inb4 not a tank
>tank: an enclosed heavily armed and armored combat vehicle that moves on tracks

First its utility
40mph
30mm gun
ATGM
Amphibious

and I'm American. If I ever win the lottery or my business plan really takes off I'm buying one of these from overseas.

File: centaur.jpg (28KB, 300x244px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 300x244px

centaur.
> 20mm cannons of death
> not that slow
>looks fucking awesome.

>>33497497
Yes this sexy beast would be mh choice as well

>>33497497
In desperate need of ADS. That'd make it viable.
And yes, it looks fucking amazing. Clearly that camo pattern is designed for marketing purposes.

File: 1443241627490.jpg (206KB, 1152x864px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 1152x864px

>>33495560
>most issues already fixed
Too bad that doesn't include all of the built in problems like lack of a unity sight, being 9 feet high, rounds lacking explosive filler required for infantry support, having the loader loading a nearly three foot projectile in a turret ring the same size as the Pz.IV's among other design flaws. Even if you had a modern one made with good steel and a good transmission made to specs, it would still be a piece of shit. Though it is pretty aesthetically appealing.

>>33495499
This mother fucker has good tastes and the dubs to back it up.

File: AAT.jpg (60KB, 733x468px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 733x468px

>>33495480
>ctrl f: AAT 0 results
What the fuck /k/?

File: untitled-1766_zpsb821834e.jpg (600KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

600KB, 1024x683px

Centurion. I mean look at it

File: Cromwell_face_view_Bovington_Tank_Museum.jpg (76KB, 800x542px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 800x542px

It's like a small, GOTTA GO FAST version of the Tiger, so fucking cute :3

File: 1.jpg (107KB, 1003x561px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 1003x561px

Sturmtiger
I dont care

>>33507024
anything that can be disable by freaking gungans its trash

>>33498703
>centre large cannon shoots off to the side
>tank flips over
*clapping*

>>33496912
>>33496965
Yeah they make new ones, and referb the old, but I hate to break it to ya man, if you lose the electronic hud, the ol back up is total shit tier. Won't be working that bitch.

File: AAcvoT6.jpg (36KB, 567x373px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 567x373px

>>33495480
FV101 Scorpion light tank

>>33500846
To be fair, it is german, and even I'm WWII german tanks where leagues better than any allied except maybe the T-34. Take the king tiger It fucking stomped mud holes out of the Sherman, usually took 2 or 3 before they died. I believe one tank crew in a tiger 1 took 67 enemy armor in week of combat.

>>33506707
>business plan
What would that be?

File: imagesPBFPF7VM.jpg (13KB, 297x170px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 297x170px

>>33507178
Why

Speed
. It holds the Guinness world record for the fastest production tank; recorded doing 82.23 km/h (51.10 mph) at the QinetiQ vehicle test track, Chertsey, Surrey, on 26 January 2002

File: 190px-M65_Atomic_canon_1.jpg (8KB, 190x143px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 190x143px

Guys come on, step up your game. M65 Atomic Annie. Self propelled Nuke launcher. Fires a nuke she'll 72 KM.

File: jagdtiger-produkcja.jpg (165KB, 957x607px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 957x607px

>>33495480
Jagdtiger, sure heavy as fuck and prone to break downs but if i have unlimated spare parts and mechanical support i wouldn't mind. It's not like im gonna take cross country trips in it. Just to have some fun while driving around city and fire on some historic reenacmet meetings. + i'd lend it to some musesums for some fat $$$$
+i'd have blast firing it's main gun.

File: M8 AGS.jpg (60KB, 682x358px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 682x358px

>>33495480

>M8 AGS with the 120mm

Because gotta go faste

File: 4a13b7e497db9c7427ac3759954b0a96.png (860KB, 900x725px) Image search: [Google]

860KB, 900x725px

Tiger II, the true King.

>>33507199
Jagdtiger is bae. Gice those bitches some 128

>>33506997
>need of ADS
It already has, look at the sides, bro.

>>33495480
Panzer IV. Partially for the overall memes and the moontoons, but also because my country could use historical shit like that. We're far too detached from our 20th century shit.

>>33495480
BT-7

but seriously considering >>33507178 too

I like small and fast tanks, probably because I'm the complete opposite.

File: output.webm (3MB, 640x344px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 640x344px

>>33495480
James Garner gave me a hard on for the Sherman.

But for shits'n'giggles i'd prefer the Wiesel.

>>33507178
>>33507184
My question is whether you would go for it with the original 76mm gun or the Scorpion 90 with 90mm gun.

File: 1490652470167.jpg (55KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 600x450px

>>33496908
Perfect size

File: 79AC612A-9CD5-4B57-9C90-9610A6F913F0-6821-0000045DD073D862_tmp.jpg (368KB, 1913x982px) Image search: [Google]

368KB, 1913x982px

INB4 Polack joke

>>33507573
CV90 with a body kit

The poles actually manages to Rice out a a tank

File: 22.jpg (936KB, 3140x2051px) Image search: [Google]

936KB, 3140x2051px

I'd have to say, either an IS-2 m.1944...

File: M26 Traverse.gif (2MB, 360x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 360x270px

>>33507593
...Orrr, M26 Pershing!

>>33504271
No, do the Karl-Gerat...

>>33506641
yeah, it could. they fucking tested it, dipnuts

>>33495641
Ahhh those lovely russian "museums" aka scrapyard or garage. I fucking hate that about those museums, nothing more but just letting those machines rot and charging money for that.

File: magach_6b_-_obr.1_778.jpg (31KB, 500x315px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 500x315px

Jewed up Patton with tons of ERA.

Magach 6 a A E S T H E T I C

File: t64.jpg (113KB, 1424x862px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1424x862px

This motherfucker right here

>>33497894
>>33504490
These niggers knows whats up too

File: IMG_0144.jpg (124KB, 650x461px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 650x461px

>>33495480
So many choices.
Either an M4A1E8, M551 Sheridan, M60A1/3 or T-72B. In that order of favor too.

>>33497167
You're retarded. A tank destroyer was something the tank destroyer board says is a tank destroyer. See: M3 GMC or M6 fargo. It has literally nothing to do with the look or layout of the vehicle.

File: img076del-web.jpg (432KB, 1066x711px) Image search: [Google]

432KB, 1066x711px

>>33508673
>not objectively superior magach 7
SAD!

File: 1490372633640.gif (617KB, 640x344px) Image search: [Google]

617KB, 640x344px

>>33498703
>IT FELL ON ITS FUCKING SIDE AND DIED

>>33507182
Obviously I'd share it.

>>33498428
>CONDOS ARE FOR COCKS
>CONDOS ARE FOR COCKS
>Liberty city is full of cocks

>>33509975
>CONDOS ARE FOR COCKS
all i can afford m8, would love to live in a nice comfy home, but alas i am a poorfag

File: amx30-b2-suite_0001.jpg (600KB, 1737x1169px) Image search: [Google]

600KB, 1737x1169px

>no AMX-30
what the FUCK are you guys doing

>>33510133
Wasn't judging you broham. You can live wherever you want. I just get reminded of that GTA IV song every time I hear the word condo.
Was on that straight edge Hardcore radio station

>>33510135
>IF YOU WANT THEMA SHITTIEST OF SHI WESTERN POST WAR TANKS
>accept no substitutes

File: tumblr_ofroeug3wz1u0l55ro1_1280.jpg (172KB, 940x630px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 940x630px

Part of me wants to go for a prototype or something monstrous.

But instead, I'll go for a simple T-72.
Something that would be really fun to drive around, take to some kind of range, and that wouldn't destroy itself over time. Plus you can fix it if something breaks.
My only request it that it has the white trim the Soviet ones wore on parade.

>>33510258
>implying
it was FAST

>>33510241
AH
AH
i see
didnt get the reference at first

>>33509304
While the other anon's argument is shit, I have to mention that the design of the vehicle was influenced by it's intended role (designation).

Designation determines design (form follows function). The layout of a TD was a very important part of it being called a TD, at least in the US Army.

>>33504475
this

>>33498703
>12mm autocannons
what did they mean by this

File: stug-black-large.jpg (121KB, 600x454px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 600x454px

>>33495480

>>33501278
It's a New Zealand made tank you fucking idiot.

File: 1483563471227-1.jpg (69KB, 862x508px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 862x508px

I know it was kind of a shitbox, but there's just something about the Porsche Tiger that really gets me going. I just love the too far forward look of the turret and its retarded Hull cheeks. Plus the whole just as fast in reverse as forward would be nice

>>33509419
I just think 6 looks better.

>>33501638
you gotta go with the mark V| universal

File: M4A1_to_M4A3_tank_animation.gif (3MB, 640x323px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 640x323px

>The blast rattles hedges as a 75mm round is hurled towards it’s target
>The turret face of the receiving Tiger I deflects the medium-velocity AP round with little issue.
>Watching this, the Sherman’s commander orders his tank to reverse back around a corner
>The Tiger fires, just as another round is loaded into the Sherman’s M3 gun.
>An 88mm AP round smacks into the side of the M4’s engine compartment, igniting it’s fuel.
>At that moment, the Sherman’s gunner fires again.
>The 75mm M62 Shot strikes the Tiger’s turret ring
>It penetrates and explodes, killing crew members and setting off the tanks ammo supply.
>The Sherman’s commander watches the Tiger’s turret fly into the air as he bails out of his own burning vehicle.
>Smiling, knowing their M4 had done her best, he and his crew watch their beloved armored beast burn out.
>”Motor fuel can’t melt American dreams.”

File: m50-ontos-tank-destroyer.jpg (102KB, 800x550px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 800x550px

Fuck you and fuck everything behind me, I'm an Ontos.

>>33501568
Not ALL of them but yes I do. Won't keep me from wanting one

>>33498599
Tighter daddy...

>>33501079
Totally, but hey, it's a 'tank'

File: If+i+m+not+mistaken+that+s+an+amx+13+90+french+_9b8e751fa18985410f764b8c6954bf04.jpg (60KB, 800x536px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 800x536px

>>33495480
AMX 13 90, with rubber tread attachments. It weighs fuck all, has an autoloader, and enough armor for anyone stuck in an apocalyptic hellhole. AKA Australia.

File: maus32.jpg (680KB, 1843x1037px) Image search: [Google]

680KB, 1843x1037px

thinking about thos maus

File: SL270905.jpg (318KB, 1600x998px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 1600x998px

>>33495480
M60A3 without the commanders tumor.

>>33514643
but hey, it isn't in any sense of the word you cunt

File: 1490639126084.jpg (150KB, 931x708px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 931x708px

>>33513241
i think im gonna cry

File: rare char 33.jpg (61KB, 800x480px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 800x480px

the Renault FT's little known big brother, the FCM 1A

>>33496954
I've always wondered how effective the armor would've been against APDS ammo even at the time it was designed. I mean it is something like 2" thick which isn't a whole lot considering later Soviet designs had a similarly thin plate at extreme angles and that didn't work so well as it turn out.

>>33497058
Usually just depends on how a country uses it and what they call it. Typically MBTs are a vehicle that has heavy enough armor to provide protection against enemy tanks, at least in the frontal arc, a weapon system heavy enough to adequately fight an enemy tank, and mobility good enough to keep up with other motorized elements.

Generally speaking a modern MBT will have a turret, tracks, and weigh 50-70 tons. The only reason for this general layout is because this layout will work universally however, if you design a tank for a specific kind of combat in a specific environment like the S-Tank, an MBT can really take whatever form best fits the required objectives.

>>33495499
The armor of the M103 was only ~10" line of sight that was a level of protection later met on the M60A1 and follow on variants.

>>33504316
I used to have a die cast M60 or M48 no idea whatever happened to it. Had rubber tracks on it that I remember would always fall off whenever I tried to move it.

>>33514841
If one ever shot a Russian then I am calling it a TD (tovarish destroyer)

File: Tankfu.png (290KB, 516x734px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 516x734px

KV-85 because reasons.

>>33510281
>Plus you can fix it if something breaks

T-xx series are actually a bitch to work on. They're very cramped. Older models have less electronics, but so do western tanks of same year.

File: Ramsay_and_yara.jpg (138KB, 1178x896px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 1178x896px

>>33513291

> run out of fuel
> depress clutch
> fire all six guns simultaneously
> become first ever armored vehicle with an Orion Drive
> yfw

File: KV-1C.jpg (115KB, 589x333px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 589x333px

>>33515352
If "reasons" are your pic, you should know that that's not a KV-85.

I'd get a T-14 Armata and sell it to the US Government

>>33515371
Any tank is difficult to work on, aside from maybe the BT series because it's so light. Which also wouldn't be a bad pick.
I meant that at least people know HOW to fix them and can maybe even get parts.
Compared to a one off prototype where knowledge is very limited and some things don't even work.
I guess another acceptable choice would be a T-54/55 because you don't have to worry about the autoloader and the complex system associated with it.

File: Porn_basically.jpg (60KB, 800x467px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 800x467px

>>33515407

Nigga, I literally cannot differentiate between that picture and this one. The KV-85 makes my dick hard.

>>33495480
The Konigstiger/ Panther is difficult to pass on, but if I can't make "modifications" I'd probably take an AMX 13. I am fond of the design and it is light and small enough to actually have some fun with.

>>33495499
There is an M103 on display not far from me. An attractive tonk if nothing else.

File: 1445558510275.gif (3MB, 420x300px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 420x300px

>>33508732
Yes. Something about russian tanks tickle the fuck out of me.

>>33515500
I mean, that's actually a KV-85... How you could miss so many obvious differences is beyond me, but whatever.

I posted a KV-1C, and this >>33515352 is a KV-1C

Just making sure we're clear.

File: Screenshot_20170402-233523.png (3MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2560x1440px

>>33515633

But that's fucking wrong.

There are similarities with the KV-1S, but both of my images are of a KV-85.

>>33515705
This is bait, right? You can't possibly be this stupid...

File: Screenshot_20170402-233759.png (2MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1440px

>>33515705

Look, you just have check the main cannon. The KV-85 is essentially just the KV-1S, but the cannon is lifted from the experimental IS-85.

I know it's hard to tell, but don't mistake me for a weak ass waifu fag.

KV-85 is love. KV-85 is life.

>>33507180

The T-34 got stomped even harder than the Sherman; usually 5 got destroyed for every tiger. What you're thinking of is the IS-3 which had a bigger gun and as good armour as the Tiger II at a lesser weight. Soviets were the only allies that put real effort into heavy tanks.

>>33515773
>IS-3 which had [...] as good armour as the Tiger II at a lesser weight.

I mean, this is up for debate. In theory it was comparable, but in practice the Tiger 2's hull didn't fall apart at random.

As for the last part; none of the other Allies needed heavy tanks. UK had the infantry tank, which had all the armor but was supplemented by the cruiser tanks for what we think of as the quintessential WW2 tank-on-tank combat.

The US had to ship everything across the ocean, so making pointlessly big vehicles was a waste of time when you could just build tons more of the ones you are already building. Besides, after the war we rolled out the T28, T29, T30, T32, T34, and M103, so I'd say we had a pretty good handle on how to build a heavy tank; we just never needed them.

>>33498740
>Plate carrier instead of MTV or IMTV
>Blown out crotch on cammies
>Dusty as fuck
>Field-stache

Mah nigga.

>>33507024
AAT a shit, juggernaught is mai waifu.

>>33515183
>I've always wondered how effective the armor would've been against APDS ammo even at the time it was designed.
Proofed against 105mm APDS at practical range (don't remember exactly), which would mean it could resist early Soviet 115mm APFSDS (Steel with small tungsten core) but not later monobloc designs.

File: SABRAMkIMBT1965.jpg (45KB, 620x261px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 620x261px

>>33513060
The Sabra prototype was the most aesthetic.

>>33498695
The UK ran trials of the STRV 103 against contemporary chieftain and leopard 1 models and found that it performed favorably compared to both of them.

>>33500846
>only ammo storage blowout panels are in the turret, for 15 rounds
>the other 30 are stored right up front next to the driver
>this is somehow better protected than the Abrams, when all modern MBTs can penetrate each other with ease

>>33495641
Was about to post it.

>>33495480
Merkava MK IV fo' sure. Internal mortar is such a cool feature

File: Challenger_2_Tank_During_Amphibious_Demonstration_MOD_45152080.jpg (1MB, 2000x1233px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2000x1233px

>>33495480
Chally 2, i think this is the most A S T H E T I C looking modern tank, that turret is pure sex.

File: image.jpg (532KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

532KB, 1280x960px

M84as: Kontakt 5, new 1200hp engine, and
muh refleks atgm

File: kv-2.jpg (48KB, 900x545px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 900x545px

>>33495480
imagine the thump of that 152mm gun

File: T-55M_2006_00.jpg (288KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 640x427px

A T-55M
>aesthetic as fuck
>reliable as russian tractor
>used by 3/4 of the world, can find parts and repair qualified technicians everywhere for cheap
>not unobtainium unicorn, can drive the fuck out of it
>simple as fuck to operate, even my retarded friends can be trained to operate it
>600km range on a full fuel tank
>manual gun, autoloader won't fail
>not as smol inside as T-64/72/80, can still fit in
>can pretend my town is the Fulda Gap

>>33512246
It's essentially a German TOG II

File: lol369.gif (3MB, 200x186px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 200x186px

>>33514841
What qualifies as a tank again? I guess it would be a tankette

>>33519717
I wanted to ask, which is faster? The T-72 or T-55?

File: dteW7gd.jpg (103KB, 1100x458px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1100x458px

>>33521028
I Choose French Tog

File: Churchill GC 2.jpg (665KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

665KB, 1920x1080px

I would take any Churchill
Or maybe a T28 or T29/30

File: smile!.jpg (19KB, 339x350px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 339x350px

>>33515372
i laughed, then i thought about it.

>>33521302
3-inch gun carrier always bugs me, it looks like somebody stuffed litteral 17th century naval cannon on a WWII tank.

>>33498634
Replace missile tubes with laser cannon and you've got one helluva sci fi tank there.

File: tiger-tank-23.jpg (89KB, 900x592px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 900x592px

Tiger. The only driveable ones are Tiger 131 and that sits in a museum, and apparently one in Germany that was in a barn for years. The farmer would take it out for joy rides in the snow until he got arrested. I'd let kids and wheraboos drool over it and maybe drive it at reenactments, since seeing the Army Ordinance Museum before it moved was a joy as a kid

>>33521631
That was Panther, wonder if that guy got it back.

>>33521670
I don't think he did. I believe a lot of the stuff was properly demilitarized and then put into a museum. Stuff like the Panther, V-1, torpedo.
Any live ordnance was probably destroyed.

T-14 Armata
grand access to tank to US and china govs for few millions $ so they can inspect armour etc. Live with that money till the end of life.

>>33521411
Yeah, it looks dumb as fuck I agree, realistically they could've upgunned it if the Churchill chassis wasn't complete shit for what they wanted

File: Black_Prince_1_Bovington.jpg (888KB, 2592x1944px) Image search: [Google]

888KB, 2592x1944px

>>33521411
That's kind of the charm about it...also what makes it a terrible idea.
Leave it to the Brits to fuck up making a tank destroyer off an existing chassis.
The actual Churchill tanks are awesome though.

>>33521834
Well they had the Black Prince in the works, which is kind of a Churchill. The Churchill Gun Carrier was an earlier idea.
The 6 pounder was improved a little bit with better ammo and the 75mm was pretty much what the M4 Sherman had, which worked perfectly fine for most things that would be encountered. Keep in mind the Churchill was an infantry tank.

asu-57

it's cute

it's sort of a tank destroyer

I'd put a cooler and barbeque on it

you can work on it yourself it's so tiny, that'd be half the fun

>>33522059
Oh yeah sorry, I meant they could've upgunned the Gun carrier with, say, a 17 pounder, but they wanted a faster tank destroyer which wouldn't have been the result

>>33498703
>turning radius atleast 5 km

>>33515372
But those are recoilless rifles

>>33514833
Why is there an MG above the main gun

>>33513241
M4's with the mudguards are the most a e s t h e t i c medium of WW2

>>33511940
I'd happily drive that with a liberty sandwich in hand

File: sturmtiger.jpg (35KB, 700x411px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 700x411px

Sturmtiger please, because nothing says 'fuck you' more than a 380mm rocket launcher.

File: KV1s_KV1S85_KV85.jpg (376KB, 700x1252px) Image search: [Google]

376KB, 700x1252px

>>33515755
KV-85 had the turret of the IS-85, not just the gun.

Top pic, KV-1S with 76mm, production vehicle.

Middle, KV-1S with 85mm gun. Single prototype, deemed too horribly cramped.

Bottom, KV-85, limited production. Note how the hull bulges out to carry the larger IS-1 turret, not present on the first two vehicles.

Leichttraktor.

>>33522785
I think we're still missing the point that the girl is modeled off of a KV-1C, not a 1S or 85.

File: FV-101.jpg (230KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1920x1080px

Reasonable highway speeds available and good to fend off anything that isn't tooled up to take on MBTs.

File: flag.jpg (783KB, 2942x2342px) Image search: [Google]

783KB, 2942x2342px

>>33525267
Comes in Scorpion, Scimitar, Sabre, Spartan, Samaritan, Striker, Stormer ...

T-34.
I wanna go to hell in style so i want one as my coffin.

>>33498703
>fictional tank

>>33497123
It's a long 75 nigger

>>33496908
>>33496845
Why isn't this in War Thunder / World of Tanks...

>>33506502
>>33506251
>>33505890
Build a literal wall of these against the Mexican border.
>It is time for zee peso's to be paid jose.

File: crack babies.jpg (54KB, 459x500px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 459x500px

>>33512246
>An

File: __eclair_girls_und_panzer_and_girls_und_panzer_gekitou_maginot_sen_desu_drawn_by_bukkuri__b5bbccc88272a53dbe6671151843b5a1.png (328KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 768x1024px

>Pz 4 ausf J
ultimate version of a bretty gud tonk

Or, just for the memes, an ARL44, because of pic related

>>33529054
The lack of power traverse in J model isn't the best feature though. Increased fuel capacity doesn't do much when you're forces are desperately short of fuel to the point you can't afford to train green crews til right before combat.

>>33507180
>Take the king tiger It fucking stomped mud holes out of the Sherman

You're comparing medium tanks to heavies.

File: armor in the water.webm (3MB, 854x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 854x480px

>>33495480
Leopard 2, the tank seems to be good all around.
Plus, I get to drive a tank underwater.

>>33498885
Storytime, Anon.

File: 668741.jpg (36KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 500x333px

>>33495480
>Implying there is any other choice...
AMX ELC bis FTW. I gotta bee fast

File: IMG_1493.jpg (82KB, 640x462px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 640x462px

Super Sherman. I always loved the sherman. And the m-50 is to best one made.

File: sexontracks.jpg (65KB, 736x481px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 736x481px

T-90S if it comes with a lifetime supply of vodka.

>>33529389
M51 has the 105mm

>>33495495
T90MS
Reasons ??
I fucking LOVE IT.

>>33500846
>The Leopard 2A6 outperforms the M1A2 Abrams, Challenger 2 and Leclerc in terms of protection, firepower and mobility.

The abrams has the exact same gun and literally 10 tons of DU stuffed into its already tough fucking armor. I'll give you mobility due to the fact the leo is 10 tons lighter

File: T28-4.jpg (143KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 800x600px

>>33495480
I don't think the Landkreuzer P. 1000 was ever prototyped so I'll take a T28

>>33529130
Regardless, take a Panther instead

Hell, even a Pz 4 with the long gun for that matter

>>33522221
i believe it was for spotter rounds to mark targets first, this was an Israeli modified m60.

50 cal rounds cost far less than 105mm tank rounds.

the israelis felt you could not have too many mg's with their armor .

>>33530160
Were would you even keep a P. 1000

T-14 Armata.

I then sell it to the US government for millions.

>>33522194
If it works like an Orion drive then the explosions of the warheads would propel the tank, not the gun recoil

>>33522130
If I recall correctly the whole reason the Churchill Gun Carrier existed was that the British desperately wanted something to defend against the invasion of Britain that could take out the up armouring of German Tanks.

I'm certain at this point the 6pdr hadn't entered production and they were still trying to rebuild forces lost in the phony war.

So they took Churchills that they had loads of added a case mate and reused some AAA guns to make some tank destroyers.

>>33525267
>>33525353
I genuinely love the CVR(T) series of vehicles simply from a logistics point of view. You have an entire family of vehicles covering multiple different roles all using the same or similar parts.

Dear god think of the simplified logistics.

Its the same with the FV400 with stuff the the FV432 APC and FV433 Abbot as well as the Saladin, Saracen & Stalwart.

>>33531026
Wherever the hell I want, who's gonna argue with a man driving a 1000 ton tank?

>>33530838
>i believe it was for spotter rounds to mark targets first

Kind of. They used it in training for simulating 105mm rounds. Apparently the ballistic trajectory is pretty similar. At some point someone figured it wouldn't be a bad idea to leave it on for shooting people with it. The US did it too with their TUSK upgrade.

>>33531839
Wtf, I want one now

>>33529158
Remember comrades

They take out bridge,
We submarine.