AR magazine alternitaves

>>33489634
PMAGs. I don't really know why you'd buy anything but magpul pmags, since hexmags are known to be shit.

>>33489634
pmags, l5 and usgi mags are the only ones that matter

>>33489714

PMAGs for sure, they have reliability magic. I'd be skeptical about promags though. Heard conflicting reports

>>33490669
Promags are shit

Lancers

>>33489634
Pmags are fantastic and uber reliable for AR's (Some snowflake rifles like the SCAR 16 and FS2000 have problems with them). The only Hexmag I ever bought was trash and didn't feed correctly, this is anecdotal but still relevant. I have heard good thing about lancer mags but have never given them a go myself. Besides that, other mags are hit and miss. GI mags are good even though some do not like their aesthetic. My favorite AR mag of all time is the C Products Gi mag with their Teflon coating. The thing slips into the rifle like a gay cock at Pulse nightclub.

File: 1399012350528.jpg (50KB, 694x535px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 694x535px

>>33490771
>some do not like their aesthetic

>>33490803
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5Q_usmtTd0

>>33490771
>C Products Gi mag

Not OP but been looking for GI mags, thanks man.

>>33490771
For your SA, it's only gen 2 pmags that had issues in the SCAR 16s.

>>33489634

That said, the M3 Pmag works in practically everything. It's my favorite mag but Lancers are a close second. Honorable mention goes to HK translucent polymer mags, but they don't like my billet receivers.

E-lander is an option.