>WWI
>WW1
Anything WWI, WW1, Great War related.
Hi-res if you got 'em
>>33484860
>>33484866
>>33484876
<having a giggle mate?
>>33484885
Those Belgians sure are dangerous.. better grow out my beard
>>33484896
>>33484909
Nobody else?
>>33484917
Ill dump what ive got
>>33484947
>>33484953
>>33484960
whoops thats not WW1. oh well both countries participated so its close enough
>>33484974
>>33484981
if anybody has versions of these without the stupid watermark please post them
Fräulein Feldgrau (Miss Fieldgray)
>>33484989
>>33484953
>1900
I think you're a little early, friendo.
>>33485002
>>33485002
100 years later...
Really makes you think
>>33484956
Le Poilu a best
>>33485017
<EA WAS RIGHT
>>33485007
>>33485013
whoops. Im just blindy picking these pictures from a file. theres probably a few more that just kinda vaguely fit the time period like that one and >>33484960
>>33485028
>>33485013
>Spikes vs Repeating Rifles
What were they thinking ?
>>33485037
>>33485036
I get that the bullets would bounce off of the steel, but how did lights on tanks last more than 5 minutes under MG fire?
>>33485039
If I remember correctly, that's from a post-WWII movie.
>>33485047
>>33485057
>>33485050
>>33485067
>>33485050
>HANS, ZE ARE SENDING ZE PANZERWAGONS!
>MEIN GOTT, FRITZ, VE BETTER SHOOT OUT ZE LIGHTS!
>OF COURSE! HANS, YOU GENIUS, WITOUT ZER LIGHTS ZEY ARE POWERLESS!
>>33485079
>>33485085
>>33485068
>>33485093
>>33485098
>>33485105
>>33485108
>>33485124
>>33485131
>>33485140
Next three were supposedly taken as an artillery strike progressed
>>33485152
>>33485164
>>33485173
>>33485217
forgot to give the description for that one. Its apparently the result of british tunnelers detonating 19 mines under german lines
>>33485225
also that was my last picture
Of all the conflicts I could have been a soldier in, I'm most glad to not be a WWI vet. More men died in other wars, but the brutality of the great war is truly hard to fathom.
All of the dead bodies and abandoned rations around created a plague of rats in central Europe that lasted decades after the war. I remember reading a soldier's diary saying he could fall asleep in the trenches with rats crawling all over him, but he couldn't get stop waking up when one stepped on his face.
Who /bayonetlugonashotgun/ here?
>>33484909
Thats in post-war USA.
>>33485302
This is the ww1 thread, not a thread for you to showcase guns.
>>33485412
>>33485424
>>33485447
>>33485453
>>33485457
Red Baron was actually killed by a rifle fired from the ground.
>>33484860
Commencing my WW1 dump
>>33485217
That's lochnagar crater from the Somme. I went there last summer.
>picardy sector is 110% comfy
>>33486415
There are very few pics of actual frontline attacks from WW1.
Most are pics from training behind the lines. Even the famous footage of the Brits advancing during the battle of the Somme into the mist is a filmed training event. An easy way to pick a fake Battle of the Somme British army pic is to see how much equipment they are carrying. Virtually all Brits who advanced on the first day of the Somme were laden down with spools of wire, entrenching tools, ammo boxes, sacks of Mills bombs, ladders and their personal kit.
This is one of the very few pics of Brits advancing on the 1st day of the Battle of the Somme.
Read Martin Middlebrooks "First Day on the Somme" for some amazing accounts of battle.
Yet more landsturms.
And those are jägers.
>>33486498
Where are their weapons?
Only fucker there carrying is on the extreme right in pic. No other fucker seems to be armed!
>>33486532
The title of the image gives away, they are retreating in disorganized fashion after the battle of tannenberg.
Pic taken the 25 September 1915, during the 2nd Battle of Champagne.
The flag bearer is the colonel Xavier Desgrées du Loû, commander of the 65e Regiment D'Infanterie who took the flag after the death of the initial flag bearer, the colonel himself was killed few minutes after.
>>33485068
iirc that specific tank's currently displayed in the Australian War Memorial
>>33486310
is that a fucking granade rifle on the left?
>>33487115
Yeah. Rifle grenades were a really common thing by that point.
>>33487115
On the right yes, a tromblon VB mounted a Lebel.
On the background there are what seems to be two Chauchat gunners with their loaders, the rest of the soldiers having Lebels (except for the guy on the middle left which have a Ruby or Star in his right hand).
The photograph being from 1917, shortly before an assault on the Mont-des-Singes hill during Nivelle offensive.
>>33484917
NZ Division, check ot that sexy lemon squeezer. Post Passchendaele
>>33487097
Wasn't the Mephisto the one that the australians captured, this one says Elfriede?
>>33485098
Renaults are cute little tanks