Lol, female soldiers are usel-

>>33482436
"Female"

>>33482436
>here, put on all this gear and walk 10ft. in front of the building for a photo op
Nice thread
SAGE.

File: Norwayspecops2.jpg (108KB, 976x600px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 976x600px

>>33482492
Competent women in the military are always ugl-

>>33482503
>female special operations trooper
wut

File: Norwayspecops3.jpg (73KB, 976x549px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 976x549px

>>33482497
> I can probably take them eas-

Oh shit, there's a snip-

>>33482588
-er...
oh, she missed. Her period got in the way.

File: women in the military and why it's a bad idea.png (2MB, 1713x1790px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1713x1790px

>>33482436
pls stop this meme

candlejack etc

>>33482436
>hey lets make this all female unit that would be outperformed by men if we gave them the time and training just for the novelty of it!

I know this is a bait thread but god damn it Norway you are supposed to be the reasonable Scandinavians.

>>33482503
Thats because there isn't a competent women in the military

File: Flickr_-_Israel_Defense_Forces_-_Female_Soldiers_Unload_their_Weapons.jpg (297KB, 1413x934px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 1413x934px

>>33482436
This is just another advertising gimmick to get goys to die for our greatest ally.

>>33482436
ess

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2394531-marine-corps-force-integration-plan-summary.html

ess

>>33482555
>>33482503
>>33482436
Tactical sloots

>>33482588
>>33482641

Fucking lel.

Good one

>>33484306
All of this money and effort spent to prove something humanity has always known since the dawn of time.

Why is the west becoming so delusional?

>>33484510
We live in Heinlein's Crazy Years. That's why.

>>33484538
He had faith there was something on the other side. I'm not so sure.

>>33482724
what would be more effective, Male-Female groups or All female groups?

>>33482742
>Norway you are supposed to be the reasonable Scandinavians.
That's Denmark.

>>33484778
neither

>>33482641

Kek

>>33484818
If you only knew. Sweden gets a lot of hate theese days but Norway and Denmark does just as much stupid political correct shit it just doesn't hit the international news the same way

t. A swede married to a Norwegian woman working in Copenhagen at the moment.

>>33482555
So where have they been deployed and seen combat?

>>33482724

Exactly this. If you objectively sit down and write out the risks and benefits of women in front-line infantry roles, you find yourself realising that the only reason you are even contemplating this is a desire from an idealistic wider society for "equality" in the armed forces, when society itself does not treat women and men equally. The death and suffering of women is more shocking than of men, and we provide gender-segregated sports out of recognition that a woman will need it to compete.

>>33482436

So what is Norway going to do with these female special forces? For the same money and time spent training, are they as capable as male recruits? Do they have to turn away better male special forces candidates for lack of funded spots in order to create this female unit? Is there any reason to create such a unit other than political idealism?

As far as I can tell from the article, the sole reason for the creation of this unit is so that they can interact with women and children in Afghanistan without offending the locals, that's it, their combat abilities are pointless, all they are supposed to do is check under Burkas.

>>33484510
>>33484538
its called the kali yuga

>>33482724
She seems useful.

>>33482436
To be fair, women do have a place in the military... Like the kitchens

>>33482742
We are the reasonable. These girls are only conscripts, they aren't added to the enlisted SOF's like most of the guys do. These girls are mainly used in areas where men arent allowed to talk to other women, some end up as overwatch support for engineers, some end up in smaller ranger platoons. The idea is that you will have a larger pool of well trained female soldiers, instead of completely dead meat.

>>33485480
Name a few then Hassan

Cant wait for a wall to be built around Swedistan

I want them to be on the frontlines.

I want to see the reaction from seeing dead women on the front. I want to see the reaction from news of female troopers getting raped/killed by Jihadis and DPRK troopers.

I want the first-world to learn the hard way how fucking stupid and weak it really is nowadays.

>>33486467

Be honest. All YOU want is to see dead women. Don't bother pretending there's more to hit. What's wrong with you anyway; mommy didn't give you enough love when you was a kid? I bet you have an impressive gore pic collection.

>>33486556
>implying there something best

is Norway even a real country? militarily speaking

>literally lower than Turkroachistan(the enternal sick man of europe) in NATO spending

wew lads

>>33486663

Population of Norway: 5 millions
Population of Turkey: 75 millions

The phys requirements to pass out their training are lower than the requirements to start British Infantry training.

>>33486556
>implying there's anything wrong with a dead girl fetish
Fucking normalfag get off

>>33482555
They're not even wearing fucking helmets, shut up.

File: 1997046954.jpg (101KB, 1080x719px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1080x719px

>>33487637
They're not even wearing helme-

My unit (US Marines) might get females soon. I feel like they will start to regret joining infantry and claim some bullshit against another marine to get out and get us fucked because of their "feelings".

>>33482724
Not that I don't believe her, because I do, but I was looking it up for a debate in the past and couldn't find it. Does anyone have source for where she says integrated IDF combat units suffered 3 times the casualties?

>>33487770

>Long hair
>All that tacticunt junk
>The building doesn't even have any marks of live fire

Is this airshit or something or Norway can't afford bullets?

File: kvinnelig_jegertro_5337858a.jpg (103KB, 1080x719px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1080x719px

>>33488020
>long hair
>women

>tacticunt junk
What did the poster mean by these statements?

Also where would there be bullet holes? They aren't shooting at wooden planks, they are going trough drills on clearing rooms.

>>33488095

>Not a live fire drill

You mean they are playing airshit

>>33488201
No, the common CQB courses start of with a 3 week period where all you do is practice on entering rooms with different obstacles and layouts. No live ammo or training ammo used. Just going in and out of a room to get the walking, aiming, cordination and how to approch different layouts correct.

>>33482436
>all these micropeen shitlords in this thread
>just because women soldiers are finally allowed the same opportunities as men
>and have shown themselves more than equal to the task
>and you all can't cope with it
>cry more MRA shitters

>>33482436
>>33482503
>>33482555
>>33487770
>>33488095
A couple weeks ago some Nornigger (norwegian) came on here asking what we thought about Norway's military and only posted female soldier pictures.
We get it. Your army is cucked and shitty. Go back to slurping muslim cum out of your mothers asshole.
Stop making your shit Nornigger army (or is it amy) threads.

>>33488286
way to chicken out of the discussion, coward.

>>33488236

That's literal airshit level.

>>33488352

no it isn't, that's how you drill something you're supposed to end up being an expert at. You start at the most basic level, a regular square room, 1 opening, no enemies. Work in the routine of being number 1, 2, 3 etc. where to clear first, how to approach the room as a team, how to rely on the rest of your team clearing the corners you can't take, having a proper walk, not stopping in the fatal tunnel, etc.

>>33482724
tfw 5' 6'' 130 pound manlet

>>33488394

It's literall airshit level m8.


Since there is no live fire, or any real stress inducing factor you can achieve the same, actually probably higher level of skill with airshit.

Which tell me that the Norwegian military is nothing more than a pretense for spending money and actually have no real combat readiness in mind. Probably why they have women in the military, and also why they don't make them cut their hair short.

>>33488255
>and have shown themselves more than equal to the task

Are the physical standards the same?

Because in the US military there is a huge gap between male and female fitness standards force wide.

>>33488394
Nonsense, everyone knows you train for CQB by having the participants wander around shooting live rounds all about the place because anything else would be airsoft

>>33488468
Unless you actually read what the original post was, this is a 3 week period, after that they move on to live fire. Trust me, Norwegian Military is far away from wasting money on military.

File: women military.webm (2MB, 613x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 613x360px

>>33488255
>itt cuck OP still arguing against the cold hard truths of biology because muh equality
Maybe you're right about not being able to cope with it. If I have to go in combat with a squad that's either all-male or otherwise, I will pick all-male every single time.
If you wouldn't, well, all the power to you.
I, on the other hand, would rather not get snuck up on because the sentry was away changing tampons, or have to split and carry a second set of gear because GI Jane got exhausted early.

>>33488501
>>33488496
Please answer these questions:

>>33488492
>>33485655

File: women military 1.webm (783KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

783KB, 480x360px

*imo tbqh famalam

>>33488501

Nowhere in the OP or any post you responded to me you said there was live fire after that period.

Also the reason I said there was no live fire is because the pic shows no marks of heavy use, let alone damage. Which means those women serve no other purpose then being cunts in uniforms for advertisement purpose.

File: old woman carrying big sack.jpg (243KB, 800x532px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 800x532px

>>33482436

That bag does look heavy and awkward to carry.

>>33484778
I would probably say the all-female units, because of the "men will try to protect the women" issue.

Personally, I don't think women are really necessary for frontline combat outside of a total war scenario. Even there, they would probably be better fit as rear line truck drivers/cooks/command/etc roles, as you could use women to fill those rolls and send more men to the front lines.

You could probably put some huge women on the front lines and be just as effective as the average sized men, though. I would trust a 6'2 230 lbs woman to haul my wounded ass behind cover in a firefight more than a 5'9 190 lbs man.

>>33488534
They are held to the same standard at the end of the service.

>>33486703
Degenerates like you belong on a cross.

File: women in the army.jpg (161KB, 800x576px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 800x576px

>maybe if I overburden myself and underequip Oksana, she will lemme smash
joke picture, but still

>>33488571
>I would trust a 6'2 230 lbs woman to haul my wounded ass behind cover in a firefight more than a 5'9 190 lbs man.
I wouldn't, that male is very likely stronger than that female and has more stamina

Females simply dont pack on the dense muscle mass men do

>>33488577

>at the end of service

What's the requirement, the physical one to become a solider in the Normeme army?

Like how many pull ups, how many miles to run in how much time?

Also what is the standard at the end of the service.

>>33488577
>They are held to the same standard at the end of the service.

Okay. What does this mean exactly? What are the fitness standards? And what percentage of female conscripts or enlistees meet these standards versus the percentage of males who meet these standards?

You also didn't answer the other question.

File: nuclear winter.jpg (2MB, 4288x3216px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4288x3216px

>>33488584
I was hoping there'd be more gambling.

File: No Fun Allowed by Lord Shang.png (142KB, 216x324px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 216x324px

/k/ don't you ever get tired of the same threads repeatedly posted over and over, for or against doesn't this shit just get old? I'd rather see Glockbabies calling HKfags out on something, or another thread about a MAC video.

>>33488571
>I would trust a 6'2 230 lbs woman to haul my wounded ass behind cover in a firefight more than a 5'9 190 lbs man.

How many 6'2" 230 lbs women have you actually met in real life?

How many of them were very obviously using PEDs?

>>33488587

Wait why does the have a tanker cap yet a navy badge on her uniform?

>>33488492
>Are the physical standards the same?
They have their own special forces brigades, so I think that they're actually above the normal male standards.

>>33488521
The military only accept physically fit women and men, so I guess you don't really have to worry about it. :)

>>33488624

Because she's a naval tank crew.

Budget cuts mean that the main gun on most Russian boats right now is just an old T-72 they've tied to the front of a cargo ship filled with bitches.

>>33488614
>>33488626
>Let's ignore actual data about stress injuries in males and females in the military and post pictures of women performing domestic chores

>>33488632
>so I think that they're actually above the normal male standards.
Then post the standards.

Because I doubt they are actually higher.

>The military only accept physically fit women and men

This statement is completely meaningless without the context of the actual fitness standards.

>>33488632

>They have their own special forces brigades, so I think that they're actually above the normal male standards.

By that logic because you can get some AK gun to be sub MOA that means that an AK pistol is now a marksman gun.

Also has the special forces brigade ever fired a shot in anger?

>The military only accept physically fit women and men, so I guess you don't really have to worry about it. :)

Define fit faggot give a physical standard.

>>33488550
I said the cqb training started with a 3 week period of just entering rooms. When talking about periods, it is implied that they move on after that.

>>33488618
>How many 6'2" 230 lbs women have you actually met in real life?
I've met one woman around that height and weight. I never said they were common. Just that the small number of them could probably do just fine in the military.

>>33488618
>How many of them were very obviously using PEDs?

Is that bad? I thought the military is always experimenting with drugs to improve the performance of the troops?

>>33488661

>It is implied

You really suck at implying.

>>33488601
>>33488598
Means getting in is easy, like 1 pull, not many push ups, etc. But then they raise the standards during the year to get up to the guy's conscript physical level.

>>33488624
>>33488624
because that's actually a paratrooper cap and the russian navy has paratrooper marines

>>33488673

>Just that the small number of them could probably do just fine in the military.

Even if they by some magic they were fit enough for service that still doesn't solve all the other issues.

Like women being a strain on supplies since they require more health care, them having a lower stress tolerance than men making them more likely to get anything from depression to PTSD, the sociological problems they bring to unit cohesion.

If you really look at it there is no valid reason for women in the military, at least anywhere close to the front line. But people still want it because "muh empowerment"

File: eto ne moyi ochki.jpg (29KB, 500x401px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 500x401px

>>33488632
It's easy to theorize that 'ehhh, I guess MAYBE a woman could drag my ass by my carrier behind cover' and such from the comfort of my home,
but when my life is on the line you bet your ass I'm gonna worry about it.

And I'd rather fall back on thousands of years of history than this newfangled 'equality' meme with women having different standarts half the time, kind of defeating the purpose.

>>33488624
Like I said, joke picture. We don't actually conscript women.

>>33488673
>Just that the small number of them could probably do just fine in the military.

Possibly. But a given male of the same size and training will be significantly stronger and more athletic.

>>33488676
>Is that bad?

Yes, especially for women. Whereas most of the side effects of PED use for men are temporary, they are permanent for women.
>>33488683
>But then they raise the standards during the year to get up to the guy's conscript physical level.

You're going to have to substantiate this. Because the fitness test standards I'm looking at right now are actually not identical for males and females and across the board are actually lower than the US military.

>>33488683

>1 pull up

HAHAHAHAHAHAH

You call that a standard?

Also what is the standard at the end of the service?

>>33488690

Why do they wear such hard to hide color on the cap?

Is it a training thing?

>>33488718
5 pull ups, 45 push ups, 50 sit ups, and a bunch of pack runs and shit. Keep in mind this is the level of conscript, not enlisted. Enlisted SOF is a lot higher. But they use the year to train them to get close to proper standards.

Jesus christ all the misinfromation in this thread.

okay lets settle this. the norwegian special forces created an unit of only women, specifically made for humint.

the physical requirements are obviously much lower than in the proper sof units.
The girls learn basic sof shit, but that wont be their use. They are enlisted and are not to be confused with the conscripted fallskjermjeger.

basically the government wanted girls in the special forces, and being the clever fucks the sof are, they created a women only humint unit, that they could actually use.

PS, conscription of girls are BS and my bet is that it will be removed in the future, when we get data how shit they are

>>33488754
>5 pull ups

Pull ups or "inverted" pull ups?

Because the test I am looking at right now doesn't actually have pull ups as a standard for women, but "inverted" pull ups.

Those aren't especially good numbers. When I was in the US Army those were the literal minimum I had to hit for push ups and sit ups on the APFT. Which is garbage compared to Army SOF and SF.

>>33488754

>5 pull ups, 45 push ups, 50 sit ups, and a bunch of pack runs and shit.

That's still pathetic as fuck. Just to get in the officer school in my country you need to pass an obstacle course which also has 10 pull ups and a 2km run in 8 minutes.

>Enlisted SOF is a lot higher. But they use the year to train them to get close to proper standards

You just saying a lot higher is not as good as you giving me the requirement.

File: 1487050080450.jpg (122KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 960x720px

>EQUALITY

File: top comfy.jpg (216KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 1280x960px

http://russianarmya.ru/zhenshhiny-v-armii/169-zhenshhina-na-voennoj-sluzhbe
>10% or less of all contract service is women
>majority of women are in infantry and airforce of Vodkaland, with a bunch in strategic missile forces

>the process of getting approved for service is no different than for men, but they do get a few more social compensations and such

>felons are not allowed

>eligible ages 20-40, none or very minor medical contraindications to the service

>length of contract is usually 3 to 10 years

>vast majority of women in contract service are in logistical or medical support, and less often in clerical work, communications/information provision.

lastly, a woman in service can be on duty (on base) and can take part in field exercises, but as for sentry, garrison and internal services, female contractors are banned.

>>33488780
Regular pull ups
>>33488788
2km in 8 min isnt excatly impressive either.
Enlised for FSK is minimum:
>45 push ups
>50 sit ups
>8 pull ups
>400m swim 11min(if I remember correct)
>5m dive
>25m underwater swim
>5km in something minutes
>30km, 20kg, with weapon, cant remember time

3 weeks selection, 1 year tryout or something

Cant remember everything. MJK have a bit different stuff.

>>33488708
Considering Russia's history of marksmanship
I wouldn't be surprised if that guy missed himself...

>>33488020
>>33488201
>>33488352
>>33488468
>the military would never practice anything without live ammunition, that's airshit!
If your only knowledge of military matters comes from Call of Duty, just shut up when military men are talking and save yourself the embarrassment of looking like a fool.

>>33488872
I thought the reqs was 3km in like 11mins and a 7 or 8km with 22g pack in 45 minutes or something.

>>33488776
>when we get data how shit they are
There's already data around, plus common sense that tells us that women won't perform to the same level as men, but this is a political issue, not a scientific one.

All Western countries will end up with front line female soldiers, because that's what society demands. And we can afford vanity projects like this.

>>33488914
For conscripts and most ranger platoons, but the pack run in FSK is 30km, think you have to have a jogging pace of 7.5km/h to make it

>>33488708
People make fun of that picture, but how else are you supposed to check that the barrel is clean?

>>33488939
>7.5km/h
if you run a 7km in 7.5km/h you would finish just short of an hour. the conscript time is like 55mins or something from what I remember

>>33482436
>Implying Norwegian women can even be compared to American women

Have you ever met a Norwegian woman?? they climb mountains all day and live solely off a diet of bread, cheese and red wine. They're next fucking level man

>>33486467
Jessica Lynch reaction.

File: download.jpg (5KB, 200x193px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 200x193px

>>33482436
>another beta cuck amazon fetishist kills a quality thread

>>33488912

>the military would never practice anything without live ammunition, that's airshit!

If you are trying to show me stronk empowered woymin by showing me poster girls in nothing more than a bog standard drill that can be achieved in airshit then you are failing the point and look no better than airshit. Especially since the training facility looks brand new and unused.

>>33488872

>2km in 8 min isnt excatly impressive either.

For a entry level test it's not bad. Especially since it applies to officers no matter the unit you want to land in.

>5km in something minutes

Would be nice if you could tell me the minutes. But minus the swimming part it doesn't seem that much in all honesty.

>>33488967
yeah, I mean the 30k run, I believe the pace has to be 7.5km/h, cant remember the time

>>33488991
I'm not trying to show you anything, I'm just calling you out on your CoD-kid bullshit. If you have no idea how soldiers are trained for combat, don't pretend like you do. We can tell.

>>33489038

>I'm just calling you out on your CoD-kid bullshit

You mean butting in like a faggot with nothing worthwhile to say and not understanding context.

>We can tell.
>We

I didn't know you were a schizo anon.

>>33482436
>all these "female soldier" threads
I swear to god it's all one or two butthurt people shitting up the board with these constantly.
Bait tier bait threads to be honest.

Some of the worst bait I've ever seen.
3/10 apply yourself.

>>33489057
The "we" is the same we I was referring to before: military men.

If you do not understand what you are seeing in the pictures because you've never been in the military, ask. Don't just assume that things are like in your video games and Hollywood action movies because it rarely is.

>>33488991
because the physical req's arent what gets you in, it's the minimum to make sure you're not a neckbeard posting on /k/. What gets you is the selection, and the 1 year you have to show a lot of progress to be put into active duty.

found the page with the req's here.
>8 pull ups
>45 push ups
>50 sit ups in 2 min
>25 hyperextension
>step test 70 with 25kg on your back
>400m swim in 11min
>25m underwater swim
>some kind of dive down to 4m, no idea what it is
>run 32 rounds in 10min, 1 round is 15mx7mx15mx7m
>30km run in 4h40m with 22kg and weapon

not the worst basic req's, but its the mental part that weeds out 90% of people.

>>33489057
you are a cod fag, you have no idea how real training is done.

>>33482724
>citing a woman
Make up your mind.

>>33488788
>That's still pathetic as fuck. Just to get in the officer school in my country you need to pass an obstacle course which also has 10 pull ups and a 2km run in 8 minutes.

That's a lot harder than wartime british officer school requirements, which had no pullups and only a 1km obstacle course to be run in under 10 minutes.

Again, I think a lot of this thread is just to hide a bunch of grown men having a powerlevel wank over who has the most "hardcore" requirements, when laxer requirements mean that there's 100 shitty troops to every not-quite-as-shitty troop.

Well done chad, you've been flanked by a more numerous enemy using combined armed tactics and mechanised infantry, have fun being swole in the POW camp, maybe the Red Cross will send you some monster energy drink and doritos.

>>33489090

>If you do not understand what you are seeing in the pictures because you've never been in the military, ask

I do faggot, that why I put the other faggot on the spot, and he failed hard.

>>33489091

>What gets you is the selection, and the 1 year you have to show a lot of progress to be put into active duty.

Does active duty mean pay since I don't recall Norway being part of a deployment?


> but its the mental part that weeds out 90% of people.

So if the shrink feels like letting you in that day?

>>33486467
>>33486703
>>33486617
ryonafag pls go and stay go

>>33489112

>lower case start of a sentence

Oh boy, let me guess you were a muhreen?

>>33484538

Awww shit, nigga. They're even talking about rejuvination, though they're actually calling it anti-senescence treatments. I can't wait until I get to fuck a female clone version of me.

>>33488521

I mean I totally agree with you and don't really think most women (as in 99%) are cut for combat. At least the chick in that webm can gut through her legs clearly giving out on her, even if they gave out earlier then a mans legs would.

It kinda sucks desu, I can see a fucking bulldyke of a woman keeping up with a man, but we're also just biologically different and that fucks with a bunch of stuff too.

Oh and then we also want to stick our dicks in them, that's ANOTHER thing... It will just never work.

>>33489144
it means you are finished with training and a proper FSK and get deployed.
Norway is deployed in some countries, mainly training other troops.

for the mental part, I mean selection. Hell week, 1 year of having to show progression and not messing up. What basically gets most people who apply to any special force.

>>33489127

Someone is a little upset. But two things for you, if you get to total war conscription is a given so your idiotic rambling about 100 conscripts vs trained troops is useless.

And 2nd of all do you really think that combined arms is always the best tactics or available, and do you really think the same of mechanized infantry?

Rough terrain, be it dense forest, mountains or urban environment it's where swarms of BTR's are useless and you need infantry on foot to clear up the mess. And that infantry can't be useless slobs, they need some endurance otherwise they will end up getting outflanked and killed by the smaller forces of chads. Look what happened in Binland in 1940.

And also do you really think that mechanized infantry means sitting on your ass in a tin can?

And also I don't see how this ties into women on the battle field, unless you mean to tell me that women make good APC or IFV drivers or mechanized infantry/

>>33488708

the fucking dust cover is off you nerd

>>33489160
>correcting grammar
I guess you really are a cod kid, and out of arguments

>>33489272

Why should I give you arguments since you yourself have given me nothing?

>>33489238

Currently:
- Afghanistan; training Afghan SF police
- Iraq; training Iraq Army, and kurdish Peshmerga
- Mali; small logistics air unit. Includes a Hercules in the air and supporting units

>>33489310

>Peshmerga

Oh gog the memes.

Have they ever participated in combat missions?

>>33488095

Quit being obtuse.

Real women in the military either have short hair or put it in a bun. These chicks are clearly just posing for photos.

>>33489319

That's not part of the official mission. In reality, our instructor have been tagging along at times. In Afganistan this is the rule rather than the exception.

This link is already half a year old, showing Peshmergas being trained by the Telemark Battallion - our guys - in preparation for the attack on Mosul. I know you can't read the text but there's a bunch of good pics.

http://www.vg.no/nyheter/utenriks/irak/slik-trener-norske-soldater-kurderne-til-kamp-mot-is/a/23737347/

>>33489319
they were specifically asked for in afghanistan since americans couldnt handle the cold mountain enviroment

File: 62721771[1].jpg (40KB, 1024x311px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 1024x311px

>>33489370

Legal haircuts for men and women, back in 2013. I understand the rules have now been adjusted to allow men to have the same haircuts as women if they like. But it's been 4 hectic years, and they may have changed the rules further already.

>>33482503
why she got back turned to us
its almost like she doesn't want to show her face

You guys realize there are so many POG position that women can take, not too mention watching the homefront.

All in all, the more women in the military the more men get to be sent to the front lines to die for the glory of the republic.

>>33489144
>I do faggot, that why I put the other faggot on the spot, and he failed hard.
You clearly don't, you didn't and he didn't. Come back when you have even a basic idea of what you're talking about or be humble and ask about the things you don't understand.

>>33489370
>Real women in the military either have short hair or put it in a bun. These chicks are clearly just posing for photos.
Not every country uses the same arbitrary grooming standards.

>>33489432
Because she's not attention whore

>>33482436
ess

File: mKjOjUY.jpg (17KB, 640x389px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 640x389px

>>33488624

Duh.

>>33488966
For an AK there is no other way. You will note he has removed the gas piston/bolt carrier assembly. The rifle can not fire at this point and you can safely check the barrel for obstructions/fouling.

>>33487806
That sucks bro

>>33482555
A still pic of two people taking a knee and posting sercuirty on the corner of a building does not indicate how competent they acutally are in combat. Also the one not actually on the corner should go post up some ways away from the other one so they aren't both killed if some grenade, ied, or a burst of lead comes there way

>>33482436
--->/pol/

>>33487806
They already got us all page 11s becuase of thier fucking feelings and im pretty sure the reason thier cracking down so hard on hazing is becuase these cunts are coming our way

File: royalnavy.jpg (78KB, 778x623px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 778x623px

>>33488912

oh but they would anon

pic related royal marines training with american coast guard to make room clearing

File: iamawoman.jpg (22KB, 450x281px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 450x281px

>>33489370

File: Princess MuscleWizard.jpg (253KB, 600x523px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 600x523px

>>33488713
>they are permanent for women.

So for only a short drug course during basic training they'd be as strong as men for the rest of their lives? Awesome.

>>33490708
>side effects are permanent
>not the useful part

File: 1473713790917.jpg (24KB, 491x441px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 491x441px

>>33490676
Why does the American coast guard have airsoft in their inventory in the first place?

File: womans in the line of pew.jpg (641KB, 677x2422px) Image search: [Google]

641KB, 677x2422px

>>33482436
and for the 10 millionth time

>>33482436
if she's in the military, and doesn't have a buzzcut, she ain't getting any respect from me. fuck off and cosplay your shit somewhere els.

>>33490676

Even when they're using airshit, they still had to take out the mag. Sad

File: should woman be allowed to be infantry.jpg (1MB, 1860x1880px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1860x1880px

>>33482436
and also just for good measure becasue this topic is stupid

>>33490708
nah. her clit will grow, her voice will deepen, her adam's apple will grow too and she might develop schizophrenia (like symptoms).

>>33482436

This type of posting is pretentious and retar-

File: CP4.jpg (469KB, 480x1200px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 480x1200px

>>33490786
>crazy
>kissable neck lump
>baratone
>big ol' clit to play with

And what are the negative side effects?

>>33489235
Even if a woman can match strengths with a man and build up the same stamina as a man, women's bones just aren't as strong as men's. You'd be getting a lot more fractures and broken bones from female soldiers simply because their skeletons can't deal with the same level of punishment that a man's can.

>>33488521
My DI would have fucking body-slammed me if I had flagged him like this bitch did.

File: yay.jpg (339KB, 686x960px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 686x960px

>>33487770
lel why do women soldiers look so unintimidating

it feels like im just waiting for them to fuck up something

sorry lefties i think its human instinct to not trust a woman with life and death situations

>>33490800

implying that OP's post isn't either of those things?

that's not how the meme works dummy

>>33488708
>eto ne moyi ochki.jpg
>dust cover removed
>bolt carrier group removed
>gas tube removed
>no magazine

My personal opinion of Russian in general notwithstanding, what the guy is doing in the circled pic is exactly how to safely inspect the bore of a rifle you fucking monkey.

>>33490708
I'm not gay but I would happily blow her clitcock

>>33491592
cause u want to fuck them

>>33488708
Your fucking retarded, and don't own any guns.