N.B.A.N.R.

>>33456111
Got an aac rem700 from a buddy for $400. Shoots lights out with my hand loaded 168 gr AMAXs even with the Shitty hogue stock

>>33456111
I want to love the R1 so much but...I just can't.

>>33456111
is this subtle vargposting?

We know.

>>33456162
Enjoy your rust.

>>33456111
>buying remshit
>in 2017

>>33456111 (checked)


What's so bad about Remington's guns?

I'm a noguns and all I know about them is the Remington 887 shotgun from videogames.

File: Clayton-logo.png (24KB, 155x154px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 155x154px

Here' the thing: It's only the NEW Remington you should avoid. Classic Remingtons are some of the best firearms you can find.

Just don't buy anything made after 1993. Pic related. That's when Remington was purchased by CD&R, who started cashing in on the name and shitting out low-QC garbage.

Cerberus just joined the assfucking later, in 2007, and continued the Remirape. There's nothing left now.

>>33456285
Z-zed? Are you okay?

File: Remington Barrel Codes 2.jpg (101KB, 881x653px)

101KB, 881x653px

>>33456285
You can tell new Remington from old with the barrel code, a two-letter code on the left side of the barrel near the receiver.

Here's the chart to decipher the code.

>>33456296
Just taking a diifferent tack on the same old shit I've been saying.
"OMG Zed said Remmintun no gud wtf?!" helps drive the point home.

>>33456284
They used to be great, but got bought out a few years ago by a corporation called the "Freedom Group", and since then their quality has gone right into the crapper. It's a damn shame, really.

I bought a remlin 1895 and there's nothing you can do about it.