Shit anti-gunner say

>>33445830
a lot of hunters, especially in the EU, see hunting as their expensive status symbol hobby. they throw money at it like other rich folks throw money at cars. if some working class pleb comes along and owns better/more capable guns, this puts his status in question (in his own dumb eyes). to them, owning guns isn't a natural right, it's a privilige you get by paying for it.

>>33445830
It's a Bill of Rights, not a Bill of Privileges Granted by Exception of the State.

File: HAHAHA.gif (3MB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 320x180px

>>33445867

thats interesting. poisoning the well for some sort of exclusivity until you eventually have to drink from it too

>>33445830
inb4 all the "fudds aren't real you're just a whiny bitch" posters show up

File: EOAR6za.jpg (21KB, 600x315px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 600x315px

>>33445830
>"But anon if you own a gun you're like, three trillion times more likely to be killed!"

That one faggot called me an anarchist for advocating for the private ownership of automatic weaponry.

File: Wahlkampf-Van-der-Bellen-griff-zum-Schiesspruegel-Grimmige-Miene-story-526531_1164x658px_31a177d018bb7d81da3380d4f20b43a4__62489010_jpg_1445671_1164.jpg (153KB, 1164x658px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 1164x658px

>>33445957
in the recent presidential election the head of the hunter's organization came out in favour of the Green Party candidate who is as anti gun as you can be. let that sink in. the chief hunter of the state, the guy dealing with game affairs, openly spoke in favour of the guy who wants to abolish all private gun ownership. pic related, the disgust for even this traditional tyrolean gun and marksman is all over his face. but hey, gotta go camgaining for votes...

>>33449442
love this one
last time I posted it in a cringe thread I got like 35 (you)s

>>33449701
It has to be satire, right?

>>33449753
>10. In a calendar year, no person may buy more than 100 rounds of ammunition.
Has to be, I don't think a nogunz would think of that

>>33449442
>in a calendar year, no person may buy more than 100 rounds of ammunition
I shot like 400 rounds just today, and I just recently became a gun owner. Honestly made me laugh out loud

>>33449442
Someone post the BLM amendment about rioting and taking away police guns.

>>33445867
Funny, cause in the US, owning guns and cars are as natural as pissing and walking.

>>33445867

couldn't the same be said for machine gun collectors within the U.S?

>>33449878
>I shot like 400 rounds just today, and I just recently became a gun owner. Honestly made me laugh out loud
This is a recurring them I see with people who were previously anti gun or on the fence who then go on to purchase a firearm.

They grossly underestimate how much ammunition one can blow in a single range trip and how expensive it can get. It seems pretty universally believed that shooting through a few boxes of ammunition is an exhausting all day affair until they actually get behind the trigger. Thus the dollar per hour of enjoyment is low in their minds compared to reality.

I have yet to witness a gun grabber turned gun owner who hasn't expressed this.

>>33445830
saving that

>only white straight men should have guns

>>33452677
this

>>33445830
>Owning guns is a privilege granted by exception of the state not a right

The shitstain who said this was an american?

>>33450456
Probably.

Statistically, full auto weapons are less lethal than semi-auto weapons because dumb people just spray them without aiming.

>>33450456
I remember someone posting a screencap of a forum from some faggot throwing an absolute autistic shit-fit at a bill proposed to loosen restrictions and prices or something like that, calling gun owners filthy peons and the like, it was more embarrassing than watching a libshit try and argue

>>33445830
>The more guns you have, the more people you can kill.

>>33445830

I am the government, because I'm a tax payer and voter. So I say, Yes, yes, fuck you, you deserve no rights you pro terrorist fuck face. No speech and reproductive rights for you. Blind and castration!

>>33445974
youll j just get dis armed and s shot with your own gun right ?
>#not projecting or anything like that

>>33452750
I hate saying this - and bear in mind that I'm staunchly pro-gun - but there are legitimate doubts about the 2A's intent.

Most legal precedent, including that set by the US Supreme Court, said that the 2A did not in fact guarantee individual ownership of firearms or prohibit restrictions on them, and it was only a few years ago, with Heller vs. DC, that the Supreme Court turned around on that issue.

That said, currently the 2A DOES legally enshrine individual rights, as a result of Heller, but we're only one conflicting Supreme Court decision away from a reversal and I think it could be a legitimate one from a strict constitutionalist perspective.

>>33449817
here in hueland if you manage to get a gun you're limited to 50 a year.

>>33453055
> muh collective right
> why yes that is the only right not of the individual
> yes the bill of rights was there to give states rights
> written by a bunch of guys that didn't trust governments, even the one they were forming
For fucks sake people

>>33453055
Fuck off ctr

File: 1395035450078.jpg (47KB, 576x432px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 576x432px

>>33453055
>When the boss has a heart attack but you're still getting paid to post shit

>>33453055
>did not in fact guarantee individual ownership of firearms or prohibit restrictions on them

Shall not be infringed you illiterate fuck

>>33450685
That's the funny thing, some of my friends might believe it's an exhausting experience because I rarely want to go to the range. It's only financially exhausting, I'd be at the range everyday if I had the cash to drop on a few hundred rounds and the time to go to one of the ranges in the area or to one of the much further innawoods spots

File: hdyd.jpg (98KB, 594x479px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 594x479px

>>33453055
>im staunchly pro-gun
>but there are doubts about the 2As intent
you're not fooling anyone here, rabbi. the men who wrote that were murderous, raping, slaving-owning traitors to their homelands. they approved of citizens owning the most powerful weaponry of the day, including goddamn ship cannons. what part of any of that leaves doubt in your mind, you cuck?

>>33453055
>I hate saying this - and bear in mind that I'm staunchly pro-gun
sure you are you fucking shill

File: 1484330301249.jpg (142KB, 1120x1043px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1120x1043px

>>33445830
>You don't NEED (x type of gun/ammo/accessory)
>Arms in citizens hands is only for hunting, and guns make hunting too easy
>Semi-auto guns/high capacity magazines are only for murdering as many people as possible
>Guns should be controlled as tightly as cars
>Women's vaginas are more controlled than guns

>MFW I hear these and more.

Capcha: killerton piav

>>33453055
>hey Jefferson, do you think "shall not be infringed" is clear enough?
>Totally bro, you'd have to be brain damaged not to clearly see our intent to enumerate the individual's rights to own firearms.

>>33453055
We, the people

>>33454314
>hans, die flammenwerfer jetzt

>>33454350
If I had the original image I'd correct it.

>>33445830
If you want your head to pop, just read the comments here.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=W5K6YymPe_M

It's a gold mine of soccer moms and fags

>>33449442
>only 100 rounds a year
I've shot over 4000 rounds since the end of summer when I started buying guns lmao. Have 700 in the mail as we speak. Fuckin libcucks

>>33453055
>Most legal precedent, including that set by the US Supreme Court, said that the 2A did not in fact guarantee individual ownership of firearms or prohibit restrictions on them

There was never a legal case that says this.

>>33449442
As a libertarian, I am not the kind of person who advocates hurting others for their opinions, but this guy objectively deserves to die.

File: 20170316_205511.jpg (30KB, 800x403px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 800x403px

>>33449442
>The National Rifle Association, Michigan Militia, and other “gun rights” groups shall be considered terrorist operations

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAWHATAFUCKINGFAGGOTHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHA

I wish this wasn't real

File: 1460401088291.jpg (393KB, 1024x864px) Image search: [Google]

393KB, 1024x864px

>>33454821
Like, the Michigan Militia I can understand because they're an actual militia group. I'm all for them and what they do, but I can see where lefties come from with it.

The NRA, though? I hear this bullshit all the time. They think the NRA is some giant gun club, where we go on hunting trips with machine guns every weekend.

File: Drill Bits 2.jpg (34KB, 358x131px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 358x131px

>>33454844
>inb4 joke

>>33454689
The NAP doesn't apply to commies
- Pinochet

File: 1445714762976.jpg (97KB, 850x784px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 850x784px

Honestly surprised this hasn't popped up yet.

fyi, she's an American. Born and raised outside of Seattle.

>>33454941
Fuck this moral realitivistic commie. No you do not get to decide on my rights and "guns can't deflect bullets" has to be the weakest possible argument against self defense

>>33454547
Actually, every single gun control law that held up in the SC does. From the NFA to the 'salt wepuns ban, many infringements were declared constitutional. That would be precedent that the 2A does not protect the right of the people to keep and bear Arms uninfringed. Whether or not those decisions truly are constitutional is at your discretion (they're clearly not) but the people who get the final say said "Yea."

File: Table_flip_flipping_rage_face_meme_custom_flyer-ra7ffec79b2a44065af1411d0b4068be1_vgvs0_8byvr_512.jpg (32KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 512x512px

>>33449442
Reeeeeee

File: bf65add448f17821ecb364b7310dc8d3.jpg (104KB, 318x409px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 318x409px

>>33454912
>she

>>33454848
>tfw you will never hunt black rhinos with a FA SCAR 18 with ur m8s
it hurts

>>33445867
nail on head. Shotgun owners in the UK are the fucking worst for this, try going to a clay shoot with anything other than a side by side (even then it's got to be the price of a new Maserati) and you'll get sneered at by Lord Childsrapingworth and pals.

Rifles is either middle aged men complaining about "the wife" and putting magpul parts on their straight-pull AR15s or teenage girls with godlike shooting ability.

Airsoft is so popular here because you can go be an autist in the woods on a Sunday and don't have to take out a second mortgage or have your bloodline tested for nobility.

>>33455124
the standard for what is bannable is still up for debate. Scalia said that popularity should be the determining factor, which is interesting.

>>33454844
>drill bits
Those aren't drill bits you nonce

>>33455298
Second Image ya cunt

Nah, can't agree with OP there. At least in these parts there's vastly more hunt/skeet gun owners than pistol/revolver/army rifle owners. Which means that if the Govt even pokes at restricting gun rights further, they get the whole countryside at their throats. Now if there were just a handful of gun lovers, they'd shit on us and ask how we liked it afterwards. So let the fudd ranks keep on growing. They are literally the wall that keep the rest of us safe.

>>33453082
wow you must have zero crime...

>>33455971
Until really the 90s, fudds usually didn't care or were actually anti-gun as long as their durr rifles would be left alone. Antigunners showed their hands after the 1994 AWB, showing really how far they wanted to go. This turned fudds into pro-gun allies (since their durr rifles became at risk) but I would not trust them to be truly pro-gun.

In the end, a lot of your fudd allies would sell you down the creek if they thought it meant that they could belong to an exclusive club.

>>33454314
Guns being as tightly controlled as cars would be fucking advance in Europe.

>>33449442
>In a calendar year, no person may buy more than 100 rounds of ammunition

That's where it crosses into satire, right?

100 rounds is what I call
>warming up at the range on a lazy Sunday morning

>>33456061

Yeah like you can find any other trustworthy allies in any matter whatsoever? I take what cover I can find, where it is, while it is there.

Anyway I shouldn't talk, I'm in a different country where gun culture evolved differently. There's a gun in practically every household but most murder/killing is done with kitchen knives.

File: 1481252134748.png (960KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

960KB, 1366x768px

>>33449442
>a whole section of the site is devoted entirely to anti-gun memes
This can't be real.

>>33455124
>That would be precedent that the 2A does not protect the right of the people to keep and bear Arms uninfringed

That doesn't address the claim that until Heller the Collective Right reading was the official reading of the SCOTUS.

I have yet to see someone who makes this claim able to actually back it up. And those that think they can usually cite Miller. And they usually do because they completely misunderstand Miller and after I point out what Miller actually says they usually go away.

The Collective Right reading was, is, and will always be within the realm of academia. There is no actual legal precedent for the Collective Right reading.

>>33456224
You don't happen to live in Norway do you?

>>33454314
>>33456157
>Guns being as tightly controlled as cars
I wouldn't mind this, even in the US. These people don't know what they are asking for:
>need a license, test, etc. to use guns in public, but pretty much everyone can get it unless too physically disabled to use a gun
>regulations on types of guns used in public
However:
>no licensing or regulations whatsoever on guns in private
>can transport guns between private locations without license or regulation, as long as they are not fired/loaded
You could have (and build) full auto DDs with no registration as long as you kept it at home, in the same way that you can drive whatever you want on private roads - car regulations apply only to driving on public roads.

>>33454882
Being a commie violates the NAP

>>33456443
Commies have expressed a desire to steal your property and are attempting to do so, so stopping them is just self-defense

>>33456322
Ok.
I was not really defending the bait poster specifically, just saying that there are many infringements currently ratified which have been deemed constitutional by the SC. That alone shows quite plainly that as far as the powers that be are concerned the 2A is more like a suggestion than a rule, and as it is being treated as such there is precedent for future fuckey.

>>33456443
This. They want to take your lawfully obtained property because you have more of it than they do. Time to pull the recreational Panzer IV out of the garage.

>>33456442
Mandatory insurance would basically fuck over everyone in some way, shape, or form.

Also
>regulations on types of guns used in public
Nice job enabling the executive to do just about whatever at a whim

>>33449442
>quote by man shot

>>33446027
Jesus christ his teeth

>>33456549
>That alone shows quite plainly that as far as the powers that be are concerned the 2A is more like a suggestion than a rule

That's complete bullshit, no Constitutionally protected right is unlimited. That doesn't mean they don't exist.

>>33456442
If Bubba crashes his Killdozer into his house society wins, if Bubba's full retard 40mm mounted grenade launcher kills his neighbors Bubba wins. The US government is chiefly concerned with not letting Bubba win.

>>33456571
>no Constitutionally protected right is unlimited
So basically you're saying you suck dicks when you aren't licking boots?
>implying a right can be restricted
The word you want is privilege.

>>33456571
>That's complete bullshit, no Constitutionally protected right is unlimited.

where do you see a limit on arms ownership, or anythign else really, in the constitution? Where does it say I can't own cannons or a man-of-war?

>"If you kill some with your cc you'll go to jail even in self defense!"
"Fair enough they need my statement and everythi..."
>"And future employers will see it on record and not hire you!"
Now hol up...You be sayin...That I defend myself or another person with my concealed pistol, even if it's a bunch of bank robbers holding people hostage, it'll reflect badly on me no matter what?

File: download (2).jpg (10KB, 228x221px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 228x221px

>>33456014

>>33445867
Meanwhile in the U.S. most fudds are of the Baby Boomer generation that swears on their parents' legacy of independence and capability while actually being the first generation to grow up completely within the welfare state, and they actually don't know their ass from their elbow.

>>33445830
When did bullet proof vests become guns?

File: 1424307877254.jpg (110KB, 349x379px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 349x379px

>>33449442
>sick of senseless violence
>declare gun rights group illegal

File: 1485526322582.png (7KB, 112x112px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 112x112px

>>33453055
>the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
What did they mean by this?