Plane Grappling Hooks

>>33437717
Such a system would require a master plan to even work, and if it failed it would be extremely painful.

Are you Tom Clancy's son?

That plan sounds rather grandiose

>>33437717
>>33437717
>>33437717
>>33437717

>>33437737
>>33437737
>>33437737
>>33437737

>>33437737
>it would be extremely painful.
for you

>>33437717
UU
UU

>>33437737
You'd probably need an inside man too, to sneak in the target plane and help neutralize the crew. Him getting caught would have to be part of the plan.

>>33437717
This seems like a pretty complex operation with a lot of moving components. You'd need a people with a lot more loyalty than mere hired guns.

>>33437749
for you
>>33437781
>Him getting caught would have to be part of the plan.
Of course.

Because the smaller plane would likely catch fire, and the fire rises.

>>33437717
you would need the right amount of big guys to do it right.

>>33437834
If your goal was to crash the plane with no survivors, wouldn't that count as a win

File: saab-340-07.jpg (172KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1280x853px

>>33437717
>EMB-110
Why are turboprops* so sexy? I still miss the SAAB 340 :'(
*except the Herk

>>33437717

Come on, if you're going to autismpost at least draw us an MS paint diagram of how this retarded-ass idea would work.

>>33437916
Only if they expect more than one of us in the wreckage, brother.

I came for Baneposting, and was not disappointed.

File: large_aircraft_62_62.jpg (2MB, 2836x1884px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2836x1884px

>>33438004

File: 6a455122d3cebe9b5ea0b423e6585efc.jpg (1MB, 3277x2341px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3277x2341px

>>33438321

File: maxresdefault.jpg (85KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1920x1080px

>>33438343

>>33437717
That idea is as dumb as shooting a man before throwing him out of an airplane.

File: v8qsscgrugwsl8gryjvb.jpg (49KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 800x450px

>>33438354

File: VP-31 P-3s.jpg (570KB, 1207x793px) Image search: [Google]

570KB, 1207x793px

>>33438369

File: 793475083837042065.jpg (143KB, 800x1013px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 800x1013px

>>33438432

File: e3e4f6ee99713458b87585c3bbf58f81.jpg (1MB, 3000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3000x2000px

>>33437717

File: 87a49f350dc0c1b2a1ec6e22a212041f.jpg (34KB, 700x340px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 700x340px

>>33438520

File: 0017.jpg (77KB, 925x643px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 925x643px

Piaggio Avanti

File: avanti drone.jpg (358KB, 1024x546px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 1024x546px

>>33439603
Now in drone flavor!

File: e07.png (485KB, 680x523px) Image search: [Google]

485KB, 680x523px

>This whole damn Thread.
Pic related.

File: Piper-PA-48-Enforcer-Mod-P-51-D.jpg (113KB, 1159x549px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1159x549px

DAMN the mustang looks like THAT

>>33438432
>>33438503
>>33438503
>>33438536
My friends dad was a p-3 pilot and he was super fun to drink and smoke cigars with!! Although I think he always got annoyed by all the geeky aviation questions I would ask him nonstop and also one time I told him and his old buddies a dirty story that they didnt find funny at all.

>>33437781

>You'd probably need an inside man too

uh...you don't get to bring friends

>>33437717
Putting my 2 cents here.

The newfound inflight load would shift the center of gravity of the C-130 rearward, especially when the Embraer's lifting surfaces are torn off, where it now serves as a drogue too. The C-130 would nose up, forcing itself to stall similar to the Bagram 747 crash.

In shorter terms, it wouldn't fly so good.

>press F for ZS-NVB, who dieded IRL for baneposting with no survivors

>>33442596
SEND THIS THREAD TO DARPA

We'd need a big guy to kick things off first.

File: Aircraft - Pilatus_PC-9_of_the_Irish_Air_Corp_flying_in_formation_9.jpg (2MB, 3254x1797px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3254x1797px

>>33439617
The Hammerhead looks too spooky for me

>>33437717
Goddamn it. Bane posting of this caliber has been retarded since this shit started.

Fucking shit has turned into Daily Dose all over again. Even the subtlest "for you" is noticeable.

>>33442651
Thanks doc

File: 8364228-3x2-460x307.jpg (14KB, 460x307px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 460x307px

>>33438004
>I still miss the SAAB 340
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-03-20/regional-express-grounds-five-planes-amid-investigation/8369958

>>33442651
Ironically, there are four u's in your comment.

File: 1427973329293.png (85KB, 255x220px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 255x220px

>>33442680
What have I done?

>>33442558
They are not my friends

>>33442690

Do you mean to say.... that wasn't part of your plan?

File: IMG_1683.png (659KB, 577x1024px) Image search: [Google]

659KB, 577x1024px

>>33442722
[Long Sustained Yelling]

Now is not the time for this thread to die, that comes later.

File: 2615749.jpg (423KB, 1500x1012px) Image search: [Google]

423KB, 1500x1012px

I LOVE GRIZZLY. THAT'S ALL.

File: 1490472535616.png (427KB, 552x515px) Image search: [Google]

427KB, 552x515px

>>33442301
cringe

File: 20170327_051657.jpg (72KB, 530x704px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 530x704px

>>33438062
>he isn't playing along

>>33437717

Bane posting is my favorite meme

>>33437717
>The angle of attack of the EMB-110's wings would then cause them to rip right off.
And the drag and weight from the fuselage would cause the C-130 to crash

File: loss.png (50KB, 994x844px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 994x844px

>>33444128
either that one or this one

>>33444186
> google image search
> no results
y did you make that

>>33437717
Baneposting aside, was the tactics the bane brigade used to capture CIA's plane realistic in any way? is it possible to capture a plane in mid flight? or would there just be no survivors as both planes would get fucked because of it?

>>33442596
That's one way to make the fire rise, I suppose

File: meta baneposting.jpg (50KB, 387x772px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 387x772px

>>33442558
>>33442704
No charge for them.

>>33444376

Honestly, Cliffhanger did it better, and when a Stallone movie is more plausible, you know it's unlikely.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4kLKfkelrw

The best part is, they actually did the stunt pre CGI, with a stuntman on a wire between two aircraft, so awesome.

last time they tried Steven Seagull died,got called a fag and punched John Wick mechanic for the sake of it

>>33438369
I saw this first in a Book I bought when kid, a few years later I saw it in an airshow. I almost shited myself with the exitement of seing the real thing

File: download.png (227KB, 1891x561px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 1891x561px

>mfw

>>33437717
I don't think such plan is possible
it would be quite difficult in order to that pull off

Bane posting aside I remember reading a book about a steam/biopunk WWI. The English would use eagles with nets to gut the delicate frame of some aircraft.

It reminds me of those blimp with chains Britain would use to stop the V-1's

Why not combining both and having a drone placing a net into an aircraft to either stop it's engines or fuck with the airflow. I suppose thet it would be cheaper than conventional explosives and fit for a defensive role; just place those cheap, almost invisible nets into the aircraft's predicted path and they might change their course for something less dangerous but with a worse attack opportunity, or get destroyed

This is a big thread

>>33445416
If we don't bump it, will it die?

>>33446831
it would be extremely painful

>>33446971
for you

File: image.jpg (11KB, 693x366px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 693x366px

>>33438369
>Beechcraft starship
Heavy fucking breathing.

My aero tastes are a lot like my firearm tastes. If it's not classic, then space magic. Blended wings tend to be the most aesthetic, but I love me some pusher props and canards. Boxwings are cool too, but you never see them in practice

There were shitloads of pic related based at the airport where I learned to fly. Did a lot of drooling. Nowadays seriously considering a LongEz

When this board is in ashes, then this thread would have my permission to die.

>>33447770
Can't go wrong with the LongEZ. Rutan is a fine guy.

Shame bout the starships though, less than ten remain. Most got destroyed by Beechcraft.

>>33442596
>stall similar to the Bagram 747 crash
Every time I see that video I rage at the idiot loadmaster and have to get this hothead outta here.

>>33444245
If you don't understand that after being on 4chan for longer than a week I can only feel sorry for your loss.

>/k/ has better baneposting threads than /tv/ now
They expect one of us in the wreckage, brother

>>33437717
It would have to be a big plane for the plan to work. Not sure if the passengers inside might be hurt however..

>>33444436
And why would I want them?

File: LazyTown.jpg (169KB, 1010x1036px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1010x1036px

>>33445316

>>33442733
Do you feel in charge?

>>33450610
It's actually better that way, the meme wouldn't die as fast. An occassional thread to activate some almonds, a plane crash here, and the meme is set for another year.

Also because /tv/ mods are Hitler.

>>33450821
/tv/ is one of the worst board on this site
most other boards you can at least have some kind of conversation
/tv/ is literally nothing but shitty memes

Banepostin

>>33437717
>Why don't planes carry grappling hooks as a means of destroying or disabling smaller ones?

Because it's less risky to shoot it down with a cannon or a missile. You need to take into acct that the potential risk of such "Bane maneuver" is essentially crashing both planes, with no survivors. Since it's probably downright impossible to do something like that.

>>33450970
that sounds like it would be extremely painful

>>33450986
U
U
U
U