Lets settle this once and for all.

>>33436795
How about we just make a rule of "don't carry your fucking AR into a Chipotle like an autist"?

>>33436839

SHALL

>>33436839
AKs are fine though.

>>33436795
What the guy on the right is doing: both hands on the weapon with hands positioned as such, i.e. could be brought to firing position immediately.

File: 1485971101000.png (180KB, 358x459px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 358x459px

>>33436795
Well it's an arm that is long.

>>33436908
Low ready is not brandishing, dumbass.
>>33436795
Pointing a firearm in any direction other than the floor or ceiling for an extended period of time, having your finger on the trigger, etc. Things that you wouldn't want autists doing to you.

>>33436795
>>33436839
>>33436892
>>33436906
>>33436908
>>33436914

It's not for /k/ to "define." This is a legal term. Look at your local laws or consult a lawyer.

>>33437046
>Low ready is not brandishing, dumbass.
Thank you, every state attorney in the US.

>>33437046
>>33437052
>>33437071

So which is it /k/?

>>33436795
fat neckbeard retard is not brandishing.
skinny manlet retard is brandishing.

there you go.

>>33437124
It's this: >>33437052. Brandishing law varies by state. Regardless of what /k/ tells you, we are not lawyers, and even if we knew what state you were in, we would not be competent enough to give you legal advice. CHECK YOUR LOCAL LAWS!!!!!!!

>>33437124
From a legal standpoint, >>33437052 this anon is right.

If OP was asking for what we personally consider brandishing, then pick whatever you want.

If you can't tell the difference between open carrying and brandishing you're either retarded or a noguns.

>>33437205
>what we personally consider brandishing
The point is that what you, me or Billy-Joe "personally considers" brandishing doesn't matter from a legal standpoint, and there is no other real standpoint that matters. The dictionary definition really doesn't come into play with legal terminology.

There's a broad spectrum that runs from verbal threats to actually shooting someone. Brandishing lies SOMEWHERE on that spectrum, but it varies by jurisdiction exactly where. It can overlap with assault in other jurisdictions. The only way to be sure is to consult a lawyer, or at least read your local laws.

>>33437285
I agreed with that in the post you replied to my dude

File: hyde_your_kids.jpg (36KB, 607x608px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 607x608px

>>33437193
>/k/ is not competent enough to give you legal advice
>proceeds to give legal advice on /k/
hmmm

>>33437664
You literally think that someone explaining why there isn't a single definition of brandishing is "legal advice." Go fuck your cousin some more.

>>33437046
>Things that you wouldn't want autists doing to you.
I don't want autists in low ready near me.