Well?

>polyshit
Eww

>buy smart phone
>catches fire
>buy glock
>explodes

No argument here
Glocks come in .45 so there is no practical reason to choose a 1911 over one. Not every descision made has to be one of practicality though.

>>33391538
>it being old makes the bullets not deadly anymore

>>33391586
That has only ever happened with early .40 glocks with shitty handloads and you know it

If you argument is a meme you have no argument.

>>33391538
Because a more accurate comparison would be a rotary phone to a dial phone with a cord.

The basic mechanics behind the Glock to the 1911 are identical except for the striker meme.

Also lol. Relating a Glock to a smart phone. They are from the 70's you dingus.

>>33391538
This just in, folks! Apparently ALL technology advances at the same rate over the same amount of time, and the amount that phones have advanced vs the amount that pistols have advanced over the past century are completely parallel to one another.

tl;dr

OP is an idiot.

>>33391595
13+1 .45s are more deadly than 7+1

>>33391615
>shot placement isnt a thing

>>33391595
This.

Unlike the phones, the Glock offers no real functions that a 1911 lacks.

Therefore it's really just preference, and if you shoot like a god with a 1911, don't buy Glocks.

>>33391608
>The basic mechanics behind the Glock to the 1911 are identical except for the striker meme.
And the barrel link

File: glocknade.png (137KB, 1000x618px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1000x618px

>>33391601

>>33391612
Not only that, but Glock is from the early 1980s. So where's the image of comparing a blocky early-80s brick-phone to a modern cell-phone next to an FNP? Some people forget that the Glock design is somewhere around 35 years old. Anyone who was an adult at the time of the Glock 17 coming out are now preparing for retirement. Think about that.

File: ATF pls go.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

Because there are a lot of handguns better than both of them

Why choose a gun that's 35 years old? You wouldn't use a 35 year old phone would you?

>>33391538
>implying i'm a babby retard fudd who can't handle a 1911 and need 3 bazillion safeties
>implying I can't abide to the basic five rules of weapon safety
>implying that's not the most retarded comparison ever, comparing an old phone and a computer to the step up from 1911 to glock

Glockfags are still butthurt over not getting picked by the army handgun trials.
What is this, anyway? Guns are better because they were made closer to [CURRENT YEAR]+2? Hand in your AR then, buy a IMI x95 faggot.

>>33391624
Never said it wasnt
But double the chances to place that shot doesn't hurt

File: 1911 parts.jpg (413KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

413KB, 1920x1080px

>>33391538

I would absolutely but the older phone if I didn't want the CIA using it to spy on me.

Anyway, the 1911 offers several things the Glock doesn't.
>better trigger
>better ergonomics
>has safeties
>much wider range of options
>less recoil (in same caliber obviously)
>double stack 1911s have more capacity than glocks

>>33391538
The frst one is a fixed phone, you should use a fixed gun in your example.

>>33391583
Clever

>>33391615

>1911s
>7+1

Thanks for letting us know you don't even know the most basic information about 1911s

>>33391635
Thanks for correcting the record.

>>33391661
>safety is good
didn't mention reliability? wonder why
aftermarket glock triggers make it just as good as a 1911 for 1/3 the price
yes, 1911s are wayyy more cool

File: 1486_5.jpg (185KB, 650x371px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 650x371px

>>33391601
>with shitty handloads

>>33391678
Do you know what 7+1 means

>>33391693
>tfw kissless virgin working for free to further the political career of a monster who ended up losing to a meme
Feel bad man

>>33391615
If capacity is really the argument here, why would anyone have a 45acp gun when every 9mm version of that gun holds more? Why do people go with Glock 17s (17+1) when you can go with a XDM (19+1)?

If your argument isn't gonna be consistent, please go fuck your own face.

>>33391695

>>safety is good
Yes?

>didn't mention reliability? wonder why
Because it depends on the specific 1911 in question.
I could post videos of various 1911s beating Glocks in reliability tests.
There's nothing inherent in the designs that makes 1 vastly more reliable than the other.

>aftermarket glock triggers make it just as good as a 1911 for 1/3 the price
lol
Well I guess I spotted the Glockbaby

>>33391583
Scrolling past this post would be a mistake. Everyone below it fucked up. Oh fuck I'm below that post. I fucked up.

Fuck.

>>33391661
>double stack 1911s have more capacity than glocks
Except for .40 S&W and 10mm for some reason.

>>33391695
>aftermarket glock triggers make it just as good as a 1911
smuganimegirl.tif

t. speshul snowflake Hi-Power/CZ/Jewgun/Tanfoglio enthusiast

>>33391710

>still thinking 1911s are 7+1 capacity and not 8+1
>expecting me to take you seriously
kek

>>33391710
Not him, but aren't 8 round magazines for the 1911 as ubiquitous as 7 rounders at this point?

>>33391729

>Except for .40 S&W and 10mm for some reason.
depends on the mag
I know RIA has 16 round mags vs the Glock's 15

File: 1472505184629.jpg (54KB, 240x430px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 240x430px

>>33391583
Oh I see.

>>33391745
If that's the case I was unaware
Not that one round of fuddy five makes as much of a difference as Elmer over here thinks
>>33391739

>>33391645
Shit warranty. They lied about their lifetime warranty to me. There's a reason they haven't been used by the military.

>>33391795

So it really never crossed your mind that maybe, just maybe,
you shouldn't be arguing about things you know very little about, huh?
Amazing.

>>33391583
>>33391676
>>33391727
>>33391783
>All this samefagging

>>33391798

FN doesn't have a lifetime warranty.
Neither does Glock btw

>>33391813
I know enough to know that a modern striker fired polymer framed pistol is a more practical choice than an all steel war horse from over 100 years ago.

>>33391538
Same reason i carry a zippo over a bic. Its fuckin cool

>>33391645
Hope does the slide reciprocate

>>33391538
Then why would you choose the glock over more modern designs like the FNS or p320? That's like buying a fucking flip phone.

>>33391963
bc the Glock is better.

File: 1486792330122.jpg (25KB, 255x255px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 255x255px

>>33391757
>RIA

>>33391819
It's a good joke anon chill out.

>>33391538
That argument is apples and oranges.
Gun tech matured over half a century ago and not much has changed significantly. You have the same recycled basic actions that just propel a bullet.
Phones have made a fucktillion jumps in tech even if you only count the last 20 years, they turned from phones into pretty legit computers that can do everything.

File: 1475038472097.jpg (77KB, 564x583px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 564x583px

>>33391538

>>33391538
The smart phone does many things while the old phone is just a phone. But the Glock does nothing the 1911 can't do. Well, except that whole "exploding" thing.

>>33391583

Just when you think the glocknade meme has run its course...

File: IMG_0044.png (594KB, 468x656px) Image search: [Google]

594KB, 468x656px

>>33391653
JUST GET GUD SCRUB

>>33392420
God, the level of delusion fudds and other traditionalists operate under is staggering. It's rivaled only by Commies.

Reality doesn't care about your romantic fantasies. "Hurr durr real men" is not an argument. Efficiency, pragmatism and adapting your design to the real world instead of forcing the real world to adapt to your design produces results. Blind traditionalism for its own sake only produces friendly casualties.

>>33392524
>1911s can't explode
Toss a .45 SUPER in there.

>>33392582
9mm kills da body

.fawty fahve kills da soul

Fuddlore is both the most entertaining and most infuriating thing in gun culture to me.

Most of the time, I dont mind it because fudds gonna fudd, but every once in a while someone who should know better spouts off some and it unleashes my autismal rage.

File: 1490064323569.png (210KB, 421x427px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 421x427px

>>33392420

I bet I could out shoot you with any glock from compact to full size and experience less malfunctions while doing it, fucking fudd. I bet that afterwards I could do the same minus the malfunctions part with your own gun and disassemble and put it back together in less time than you can.

I fucking hate fudds, get good

File: hrrrngg.jpg (74KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 800x533px

>>33392582
but there is an argument to be made for traditionalism. militarily, the 1911 is fucking dead as a standard issue weapon. only one action mode, semi-complicated disassembly, hammer-like weight, etc.

but, on the perspective of someone in the gun store, at least to me, there's something right about the 1911. it just works together. don't lie to me, there is some enjoyment in holding a 1911 in your hands. there is absolutely no enjoyment in a glock for most. it's a plastic brick, and it works.

it's a philosophy thing more than anything. do you want a weapon that you need no more than basic training for it to work pretty good all the time, and do what it should, but never really get above that point, or do you want something harder to use, but once you get that fucker down, it can be miles ahead of what other guys have. and this isn't just a firearm philosophy, this applies to cars or jobs or anything in life.

and that's why I choose the 1911.

>>33391858
>striker fire is better meme
>uniorincally prefers polymer over steel
opinion discarded

File: lolgif3.1.gif (1MB, 150x113px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 150x113px

>>33392644
>>33392582

>assmad because you know you can't win the argument
top kek

>>33392662
Giving yourself a handicap does not make you better, it just means you have to work harder to be as good.

>>33391538
Because the Glock wasn't used to shoot Germans in the face

twice

The glock is for eurofags, that's a fact

>>33391583
>shitty old design stopped evolving in the 40s
or
>shitty old design that stopped evolving in the 80s

hard question OP

>>33392702
I disagree. the 1911 will still go bang when you pull the trigger, and at the end of the day, that's all that's gonna matter.
I just fail to see the point in purposefully forcing yourself to always be average when you could face some difficulty and be better.

>>33392662
>1911
>semi-complicated disassembly
Huh?

File: right.jpg (183KB, 1200x772px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 1200x772px

>meanwhile

>>33392782
compared to a glock, it's more complicated.
I mean, once you get it down it's fine, but it is more difficult than the glock's disassembly, if only slightly.

>>33392643
It's funny, but the fact that people actually believe this shit hurts my brain.

>>33392662
>but there is an argument to be made for traditionalism
No. Traditionalism is "we should do this because it's the way people in the past did it", independent of the actual merits of the thing in question. It's a crappy standard for anything.

The rest of this basically amounts to you admitting that the 1911 is nothing more than a fun range toy, which is not an opinion I disagree with, until we get to here

>but never really get above that point, or do you want something harder to use, but once you get that fucker down, it can be miles ahead of what other guys have
This is a bullshit statement with nothing to back it up. I have regularly seen polymer wondernines trounce 1911s in competition. You're attributing the results of practice and shooter skill to the gun.

>>33392666
I too enjoy more complicated, heavy and rusty guns that offer no real advantage because lol plastic is for queers.

>>33392784
The epitome of lipstick on a pig.

>>33391651
>You wouldn't keep a 35 year old government would you?
>You're gonna commit suicide on your 36th birthday, right?

File: mad1.gif (77KB, 333x500px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 333x500px

>>33392817

>>33391739
Did all those 7 rounders just dissapear?

>>33392850

Out of every gun intended for serious use, yes.

>>33392582
you have to be 18 to post here

>>33392846
Old memes, the first and last resort of the buttblasted fanboy.

>>33392817
>complicated
you have to be mentally handicapped to not understand a 1911

>heavy
>can't handle 1 pound

>rusty
do you enjoy storing your guns in mud by any chance?

It's a shitty comparison.

A 1911 is more like an old muscle car. GLAWK is more like a newer Ford Fiesta.

I'd take an old Mustang over a Fiesta. Yeah, the Fiesta gets better gas mileage and stuff...but it is a Fiesta.

>>33392865

>trying this hard to get a reply

>>33392866
there's also the point to be made that the fact that it's heavier is better because it balances the gun and helps the recoil dissipate because there's just more gun to absorb it.

>>33392767
You said it yourself. Any decent gun will go bang when you pull the trigger, and at the end of the day that's all that matters. Why waste time getting an antiquated design to work for you when a new one will have you performing just as well right out of the box? You won't be any better just because you mastered a more complicated manual of arms, you'll just stop being worse than the person who went with something simpler to begin with. Should you and another train the same amount with different weapons you will always be worse than them because they started ahead of you.

>>33392898
How does the 1911 handicap you in a way the Glock doesn't? Ammo capacity is irrelevant in this question.

>>33392860
So me having one less round in my gun means that if i were to shoot/rob/rape you with it, you wouldnt take it serious right?

>>33392898
there's two extra things a first time 1911 shooter has to understand, and it's not hard at all
>manual safety
most people could figure out that when the thing blocks motion, the pistol won't function
>SAO
again, this is just "hey, make sure the hammer's back before you fire"
what is that, maybe, maybe, 5 mins extra time of explanation?
seems like an irrelevant handicap to me.

>>33392921
Manual safety.
Ammo capacity is never irrelevant, by the way. Don't make laugh. Double stack 1911s exist though.

>>33392951
If you only spent 5 minutes training to take off the manual safety you're going to die like a bitch when you draw on Jamal who doean't have to do anything but pull out his Glawk Fotay.

>>33392898
I feel like i'm watching two weebs compare katanas.

A 1911 is not more complicated than a modern gun of the same size. They still make 7/8+1 guns that are full sized and slightly heavier than a polymer pistol.

The ONLY advantage modern guns may have over a 1911 is capacity and size being smaller. But not everyone wants a light .45 because then the recoil becomes an issue. And not everyone wants a teeny tiny pistol because for some people, they require a larger gun to be comfy.


I HATE 1911's myself. But wrguing that they are bad, because they are old and only because they are old, is stupid.

File: 1489607962276.png (291KB, 1880x849px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 1880x849px

Try and post a better gun than the 1911

>Protip - you can't

>>33392973
>If you only spent 5 minutes training to take off the manual safety
>Manual safety.
if it's that big of a problem to you, just carry it condition zero and make sure it has a series 80. that's what you're doing with a glock, and if you're not totally fucktarded, you'll be fine.

>>33392973
>can disengage the safety while drawing
>all you have to do is move your bloated sausage of a thumb a little bit

Also, I was saying that it's irrelevant for the question, not for practicality.

>>33392975
>I HATE 1911's myself.
may I ask why? I don't wanna get into a shitfit with you, I'm just curious as to your reasoning.

>>33392866
>you have to be mentally handicapped to not understand a 1911
Well that's just not true, since 1911 fanboys clearly do understand them.

This does however demonstrate how narrow-minded fudds are. Sure you can figure it out fairly easily. But there's more parts to manufacture, more parts to break, more parts to wear out, etc. Simpler is always better as long as it can accomplish the same objective.

>can't handle 1 pound
Not an argument. Just because you CAN handle something doesn't mean you need to. Example: a man who is strong enough to wield a 6-foot long sword is also strong enough to wield a normal-sized sword much faster and for much longer.

>do you enjoy storing your guns in mud by any chance?
Nah, I just don't treat my guns like safe queens the way you have to treat a 1911.

>>33392891
It's funny because I bet you're the same person who would say people choose 9mm because they can't handle recoil.

>>33392921
>tell me how this thing is better but you're not allowed to talk about the main thing that makes it better
Fudds, ladies and gentlemen.

>>33392951
Those things add extra points of failure and offer no real-world benefit.

>>33392975
I don't use either but it's undeniable that you have to put time in to learn how to use a 1911 that simply isn't there with the Glock.
What the fuck are you going on about?

>>33392988
And here you fall back on the typicaly 1911 fanboy response, pretending Glocks don't have a safety. A SA with no safety is not comparable to a striker with a trigger safety.

>>33392991
>t. range queen who has never felt adrenaline in her life

>>33391661


glock isn't the only alternative to the 1911.

>>33391538

These threads are made by noguns teenagers that think gun collecting is the same as picking a class in an GPS.

First you buy one, then you buy the other. You end up liking them both for what they are.

>>33393021
the glock trigger safety is comparable to the 1911 grip safety
>passive
>prevents shit from AD'ing the gun
>does not prevent an actual shooter from discharging a round

>>33393016
>Those things add extra points of failure and offer no real-world benefit.
I'm not gonna argue that more moving parts add more failure modes, this is a given.
however, I don't see how a manual safety doesn't offer any real world benefit.

>>33393016
>literally 1 fucking pound, if you have to hold out your pistol for long enough for that pound to make a difference you are either on a range or you fucked up

>Nah, I just don't treat my guns like safe queens the way you have to treat a 1911.
>just have to keep it dry

>>tell me how this thing is better but you're not allowed to talk about the main thing that makes it better
because it's a fuckin meme at this point, and as someone mentioned earlier there are double stack 1911s

>>33393006
I don't hate them for the sake of hating them. I'm just a small dude. I can't CC one, and if I OC one it is uncomfy as fuck. Then when shooting one, it just feels really awkward in my hands because I have little baby hands.

I bought a Glock 36 as my go to .45. And the only full sized .45 I have ever thought was nice was a USP my dad has. It's bigger than a 1911 of course, but for some reason I liked it. I still would have the same issues carrying one though.

>>33393021
What. You pick up a 1911 and hold it correctly, and it fires. Numerous guns have manual safeties of different kinds. The 1911 is not some sort of complicated space gun. You've never shot one, have you?

>>33393092
hey man, thanks for the response, fair point.
I'm the same-ish way about glocks. I just don't like how they hold, it just feels wrong to me. the grip angle and size, mostly. and well, what use is CCing a gun if it's not even comfortable?

>>33391932
>threading on stock attach point clearly exposed

>>33393109
assuming this is a real question, corrosive ammo or no? if corrosive, clean it after every shoot or it'll fuck up bad after awhile.
granted, little paranoid, but better safe than sorry imo.
if non-corrosive, see if you can switch to not-steel ammo and see how that goes.
have you cleaned it before?
if no, deep clean that motherfucker.
if yes, maybe try a different solvent.

>>33392975
>A 1911 is not more complicated than a modern gun of the same size.
Objectively bullshit, obvious noguns detected

>The ONLY advantage modern guns may have over a 1911 is capacity and size being smaller.
>what is:
>simplicity
>corrosion resistance
>light weight
>lack of stupid grip safety
>lack of stupid manual safety
>economy
>ease and speed of production

>But not everyone wants a light .45
That's true, only idiots want a .45 in the first place.

>>33393066
>however, I don't see how a manual safety doesn't offer any real world benefit.
A manual safety doesn't prevent idiocy. If you're on the ball enough to use it, you're on the ball enough to not need it.

>>33393074
>weight only matters when you're holding the gun
Confirmed range queen.

>just have to keep it dry
But why should you need to live with that when you don't have to, and you get no practical benefit in return?

>because it's a fuckin meme at this point
Also known as an argument you can't refute

>as someone mentioned earlier there are double stack 1911s
Which are bulkier and vastly more expensive than other double stack guns.

>>33393104
Well I'm not a fan of regular glocks either. Same issue you have. They feel almost...I don't know. Like they are top heavy? And like the grip is forcing you to point down slightly. To me at least. The 26/36 glocks are nice though. They are single stacked which makes the grip not feel like ass. And the top is narrowed which makes it feel more balanced.

I had to carry a Glock 19 at my old job and had to shoot a lot with it. I hated every moment of it. It was always just awkward. That is how I guess we can describe full sized/nirmal shaped glocks. Just awkward lol.

>>33392875
This

>>33393143
A gun that is made of like, three main parts and is singled stacked is TOTALLY a gun that only mechanical engineers can master. Yes. The 1911 is an enigma in its complexity.

Nigga you tarded.

>>33393143
>>corrosion resistance
>>light weight
>>lack of stupid grip safety
>>lack of stupid manual safety

>corrosion resistance
come on man, unless you plan on A, buying a 1911 that has no finish on it, or plan on storing your guns in salt water, this is a non issue.

>stupid grip safety
this is basically the glock trigger. it is a passive safety. that is all it does. it's entire purpose is to prevent ADs without impeding the shooter.

>stupid manual safety
this is something that's actually useful for in the safe, if you just wanna be sure. and, the benefit of the manual safety is that it's optional.
nothing's stopping you from keeping a 1911 condition zero, and nothing stops you from keeping it condition one or even up to condition three.

come on man, make a fucking argument.

>>33392973
>Ammo capacity is never irrelevant, by the way.
Fuddlore. Most self-defense cases don't even require firing a carry weapon whatsoever; when firing is necessary firing more than 1 round is rare, and never has it actually been necessary to unload 17 rounds.

You're not John Wick, the world is not in a post-apocalyptic shit fit state, and unless you are actively in the military and in combat, Ammo capacity is very much not relevant.

File: mmm spicy.png (453KB, 890x500px) Image search: [Google]

453KB, 890x500px

>>33392420

Holy shit that's some /pol/-tier revisionism

I dig

>>33393143
>1 pound
>it can make a difference for concealed carry, but ok

>But why should you need to live with that when you don't have to, and you get no practical benefit in return?
>one of the basics of keeping firearms is to store them in a dry location

>Also known as an argument you can't refute
also known as a meme shat out by glock fanboys

>Which are bulkier and vastly more expensive than other double stack guns.
ok

Because unlike those two phones, those two guns do not perform significantly differently.

This is also a strawman analogy, Glocks are not 21st century devices. The only part of them even remotely modern is the polymer frame which is a decades old technology. By this logic we should all be getting gimmicky spaceguns because "hurr dey r newer"

land lines are a million times more clear than shitty compressed data.
I only own a smartphone because it's a pocket pc. useless for actual phone calls.

>>33393179
I can't stop you from deliberately misinterpreting what I say, but it does make you look awfully foolish.

>>33393190
>come on man, unless you plan on A, buying a 1911 that has no finish on it, or plan on storing your guns in salt water, this is a non issue.
Finish wears off of steel. Polymer can't rust period. Steel provides no practical advantage and has the potential to rust, however slim you think it might be.

>this is basically the glock trigger.
I think the Glock trigger safety is pointless too. It doesn't actually prevent ADs or NDs, really, it's only there to appease the lawyers.

>this is something that's actually useful for in the safe, if you just wanna be sure.
Your irrational paranoia doesn't make something an advantage

>and, the benefit of the manual safety is that it's optional.
nothing's stopping you from keeping a 1911 condition zero, and nothing stops you from keeping it condition one or even up to condition three.
Except, you know, that they regularly snag on clothing and holsters and get accidentally engaged. In which case they're an active liability if you thought you were carrying with the safety off. And in the case of the 1911, they're just not safe to carry cocked without the safety, so it's not optional.

>come on man, make a fucking argument.
You mean like all the ones you ignored?

>>33393232
>it can make a difference for concealed carry, but ok
Concession.

>one of the basics of keeping firearms is to store them in a dry location
We already know you're a range queen, you don't need to keep making it obvious.

>also known as a meme shat out by glock fanboys
>more capacity is a meme
I think we've reached maximum fanboy stupidity here.

I'm not a huge Glock fan, by the way. I don't like the grip angle personally, and I think they're ugly as shit. But I'd take one over an outdated range toy any day.

>ok
Concession.

>>33393143
>>light weight
oh yeah, forgot this fucking point.
a milspec 1911 unloaded is 39 ounces - 2.4lbs (from springfield site)
an empty g21 is 28 ounces - 1.75 pounds

assuming .45acp 230gr ball weighs .7 of an ounce, our 1911 with 8+1 is 45 ounces - 2.8 pounds

our G21 glock carries 13+1 rounds, meaning it is 39 ounces fully loaded. - 2.4 pounds.

2.4 vs 2.8 lbs, or 39 vs 45 oz.

it's not as big of a difference as you make it. it's not an insignificant difference, but it's not a S&W 629 vs a goddamn Ruger MK4.

>>33393206
>Ammo capacity is very much not relevant.
It is if I'm being shot at. Now fuck off Feinstein.

The 1911 is a fucking helluva gun, it's a real gun, a heavy gun, a gun that a man uses, and k is full of children, little children, children who need the newest toys, the cheapest toys, the toys their friends have.

It's too expensive for these children, it's over their allowance. They spend $700 to get a Glock variant, they put the cheapest pieces on it, they spend $1300 to trick their shitty Glock out, to make it look like a real handgun, to make it look like it's something worth having.

To them, the bells and whistles are the gun, the gun is not the gun. They don't want to spend $1400 on a pistol, they want to spend $1400 on accessories, toys for their toys. It's a mans gun with a mans price and needs no toys, it is a tool.

>>33393280
You called a gun that is the same complexity as the gun you are comparing it to, more complex.

A 1911 and a Glock have almost the same guts to them the only difference is the frame material and where the safety is. That's it. However the extra weight is usually a non-issue on a 1911, and the safety on one effectively wirks the exact. Same. Way. As an internal Glock safety.

I can't help but meet you with sarcasm, because you're too autistic to take seriously.

File: 1453171385985.jpg (3MB, 2250x1500px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2250x1500px

>arguing about Glocks and 1911s
>not posting the best CC gun on the market

you all are a bunch of fucking queers.

>>33393299
.45 ACP in general is a stupid round and a significant part of the problem.

And again. It may be a small benefit. But it's still a benefit.

>>33393306
Is this some spicy new copypasta? If so, I approve. Excellent parody of fudd "logic".

>>33393320
>You called a gun that is the same complexity as the gun you are comparing it to, more complex.
>A 1911 and a Glock have almost the same guts to them the only difference is the frame material and where the safety is.
You have obviously never disassembled either gun beyond the most basic field-stripping.

>However the extra weight is usually a non-issue on a 1911
Doesn't make it better, still a negative.

>and the safety on one effectively wirks the exact. Same. Way. As an internal Glock safety.
This is probably the single dumbest thing you have said.

>>33393356
>you all are a bunch of fucking queers.
D I C K G R I P S

>>33393373
D A / S A
P O C K E T
S I Z E D
9 m m
L I T E

>>33393373
Why would I disassemble my guns further than need be to clean them and keep them shooting? If you want to take a glock apart past "the most basic field stripping" you need tools. I'm not fucking with my $400 gun like that.

>doesn't make it better

Weight helps keep you from having as much recoil. That is a positive. A 1911 has less recoil than my Glock 36. Even I see the value in that, despite hating 1911s.

>hirr durr u stoopid.

The two safeties are different in how they are put together byt they function exactky the same. It keeps you from shooting the gun until your hand is on the gun. You're being pretty defensive bruh. Are you Nutnfancy?

File: obrez.jpg (60KB, 800x347px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 800x347px

>>33393373
>.45 ACP in general is a stupid round and a significant part of the problem.
beautiful execution of a strawman

>>33393356
>implying

>>33391538
>Using an iPhone

OP's breath confirmed for smelling like cum

>>33392642
Anything can explode if you try. I'm talking about unintentional explosions.

>>33391583
Took me a second

>>33391538
Because I'd rather drink the whiskey that's been fermenting since WWII than the beer that was made two weeks ago.

>>33391538
Because it's much nicer to shoot faggot.
That's all I care about.

>>33391798
>They lied about their lifetime warranty to me.
Oh hey it's you, still don't know how to read do you?

>>33391538
Appeal to novelty fallacy.

File: what is this.jpg (4KB, 125x120px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 125x120px

>comparing phones to guns
>implying you would drink scotch that I stilled today rather than 21 year old single malt
>people took the bait

File: fuddy fav vs glawknade.png (1MB, 2268x2256px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2268x2256px

>>33391538

Ever notice how all non 1911 fags feel a need to compare whatever they own to a 1911? But but but my gun is just as good as your 1911. Great. You buy what you like. I will buy what i like.

>>33391615
If a whole mag of 45 from a 1911 doesnt kill my target, a few more arent going to matter. And before you ask me how im going to defend myself against 23 african americans that jump me in the street, reload while putting distance between you and the threat.

>>33391993
But then why choose a glock over a 1911?

>>33393104
>what use is CCing a gun if it's not even comfortable?

The use? I guess the 16 rounds of reliable hollowpoints, and the ease of presentation.

Do you wear jeans instead of pajama bottoms? What's the point in covering yourself if it's not even comfortable?

>>33391798
Story?

>>33391637
>someone saved my OC

Feels good.

>>33392575
>gali
Patrician taste my good lad

>>33391612
>OP is an idiot.


This.

File: 1485463019508.jpg (71KB, 414x499px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 414x499px

>>33391586
kek'd

>>33391583
clever girl

>>33391637
>bandaged hand
fucking kek

>>33396806
You need 556 for an urban african american mob these days. They are often wielding hipoints as well as their usual rage.

>>33392575
Fuck I miss Bionicle.

>That Website
>The World
>Characters
>Pretty decent movies

RIP Lego

>>33392644
>smug anime girl reaction picture
opinion discarded

>>33391631
>no real functions that a 1911 lacks

A glock, much like a modern cellphone, can also be used as an explosive device.

Checkmate

>>33392575
Bionicles were so fucking sweet.

>>33391538

>a gun designed in 1979

>a modern cell phone

File: Maid Kopaka.png (143KB, 923x625px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 923x625px

>>33392575
>>33397419
Gali is meh, Kopaka is the true thinking man's choice.

File: 1452175891240.jpg (53KB, 480x445px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 480x445px

>>33391583
>Mfw I used to own a Note7

>>33391645

Hahahahahah,

You own the "WHO???" of pistols

>>33397416
congrats on no longer being a newfag

>>33398226
Bionicles? You mean those things I cum on to establish dominance over my other toys?

File: 1467336533054.jpg (45KB, 339x368px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 339x368px

>>33392575
>mfw realizing those four pieces around her waist represented wider hips

File: 1484695470319.png (56KB, 370x370px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 370x370px

>>33391583

>build 1911
>test fire
>Failure to extract erry tim
>Disassemble slide
>Tweak extractor
>Reassemble
>Magdump successfully

>Buy Glock
>Explode
>Doesn't like the ammo, FTEs
>Can't tweak without voiding warranty or buying aftermarket parts at date rape pricing and THEN voiding my warranty
>Trigger "safety" is totally a safety guys, it only disengages if the trigger is pulled

File: image (13).jpg (60KB, 461x805px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 461x805px

>not dual wielding the both of them for maximum firepower and capacity
Sad, honestly.

>>33391583
I don't have a smartphone. Can someone please explain the joke for me?

File: 1223162124~02.jpg (400KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

400KB, 1920x1080px

But the 1911 is available with both double stack mags and plastic grips.

>>33391583
noice
>>33399145
glocknade, phonenade (note 7)

>>33397224
yeah but one of the cardinal things of being effective with a firearm is being able to hold it in a way that you can instinctively grab it and have a comfortable and solid grip.
>>33398798
kek'd

>>33391601
https://youtu.be/1dapVWOqMNE
You rang?
Glock going kaboom with factory ammo. Note how the slide and barrel are untouched while the polymer is wrecked.

>>33391538
Tell, me a curious Bavarian, what makes Glocks so popular?

What did the fucking Austrians this time?

>>33399145
Glocks known to explode cause idiots ignore rule on using overpressured reloads.
Samsung Note's exploded cause battery was cheap shit(look that shit up, if you stabbed a battery it would fucking shoot out flames.)

Pretty Clever/10

>>33391538
You know 17 years ago if you weren't active police or military and you had a semi auto pistol of any kind like a 1911, you were considered a gun nut as you were given the stink eye by hunters as well.

>>33397671
Thanks mate, for once a valid opinion

File: m1911onfern.jpg (491KB, 922x692px) Image search: [Google]

491KB, 922x692px

I have a Glock.
I have a 1911.
I like them both.
Both are fun to shoot.
Both are accurate and reliable.
Both would serve very well in an SD encounter.
IDK, I guess I'm not autistic enough for this thread.
So, here's my 1911.

File: 1471992365067.jpg (50KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 640x640px

>>33396329
>you don't need more than 7 rounds
huh, Fudds are Feinstein supporters; who knew?

>>33391538

muh histurries.

Don't make it into a thread where you hate on old stuff, there's lots of nice old things out there like double rifles and rolling block rifles and DE razors and straightrazors and old American muscle cars and laudanum drops to treat common maladies or fingering women in a medical fashion to cure them of hysteria and colonisation of foreign lands and classic bodybuilding physiques like Steve Reeves and Frank Zane and people of integrity so you could trust your neighbor to not clear out your house if you go on vacation and the whole town gathering up to tar and feather or even lynch ne'er-do-gooders and your whole family dying of simple diseases so your parents would have tons of kids so they could stand to lose a few, and the kind of stoically enduring matter-of-fact mentality that came with it.

If I wanted a plastic brick to go shooting, the Glock would be about my last choice due to it being overpriced junk championed by sperglords.

I'd buy a Canik for half price of a Gluck, and get a shitton of goodies in the case, too.

I shoot and open carry a 1911 (6k rounds through it, no FTF or FTE) and CC a Ruger LCP II.

The only thing worse than a Gluck is the autizmo's who hysterically worship that crap because they can't handle a real gun with a safety.

>>33398250
I used to toss it at my friend while yelling "It's gonna blow!" and he freaked out every time. I kinda miss having one.

>>33391615
The majority of self defense situations have three rounds or less fired

>>33403529
Run on sentence, fix your grammar you piece of human garbage

>>33403299
>Zed !ZF41dz6F/Y
>I guess I'm not autistic enough for this thread.
Pfft. When the fuck did you get unbanned anyways, ese?

File: Aria_M1911.jpg (593KB, 1573x884px) Image search: [Google]

593KB, 1573x884px

1911 > all

outdated but makes all other gun owners instantly have an inferiority complex and go into full damage control (though thats true for glockcucks with anything)

File: a74ad4c9316b14566caa088b575a30a0_bad-memes-bad-memes-everywhere-meme-bad_625-475.jpg (66KB, 625x475px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 625x475px

>>33391538
This meme has reached new unprecedented levels of stupid

>>33403791
My condolences to the loss of your friend

>>33391583
Subtle

>>33403366
You showed your lack of understanding of english. 1911 say you dont need more rounds if you use a 1911 in .45. We have no problem with you owning any gun you choose or all guns if you choose. The congress bitch say you shouldn't be allowed to own more than her magic number of the day. Huge difference but im sure you knew that. Guess you wanted to get a rise out of someone. Good job. Wish i had nothing better to do than be a dick safely behind a keyboard.

>>33391583
kek

>>33392864
You have to have a girlfriend and be out of your mom's basement to post here

>>33399145
The joke is that you're poor

>>33402199
You realize there is factory made P+, right?

>>33392875

No

10+ more rounds, drop-in parts, lighter weight, and extremely durable is better than any the 1911's attributes except for triggers.

>>33391612
well ok yeah, if you want to split hairs. but OP's main point still stands. glocks are superior to 1911s in every practical, objective way except looks

File: Ruger P90 3.jpg (115KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 1000x750px

P-Series Ruger in .45

Can you hear me now?

>>33392644
Holy shit it's like that image with the glockfag telling the revolverguy "I'M TRAINING FOR A SELF DEFENSE SCENARIO WITH OVER 20 ENEMY COMBATANTS" with his hits all over his fucking target.

>>33403045
All lithium batteries explode if you stab it, stabbing tears open the separator and causes lithium to react vigorously.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1n2ue9QmdM

The problem with Note 7 was separator was too weak and did not need to be stabbed to explode.

>>33410260
Ah, the P345.

replaced by the striker fired SR45... fucking garbage.

>>33408222
You realize factory ammo makes glocks go kaboom because polymer is shit?

File: 1489561586516.jpg (2MB, 1447x2046px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1447x2046px

>>33393373
>literally posts the one fucking makarov model without dickgrips
>posts dickgrips meme
You didn't e v e n try

>>33391795

If one round of .45 doesn't make a difference to you, why should five make a difference to the guy you're arguing with?

>>33391583
Are you Australian?

>>33391601
I used to have an open mind to Glocks.
>go to range
>rent a bunch of guns to try out
>get to the Glocks
>this is ugly, but appearances don't really matter, only function
>feels uncomfortable in hand
>eh, it doesn't matter, as long as it works, it doesn't need to be comfy.
>go through a couple mags
>after the second mag I hear a rattling in the gun
>some thin piece of metal by the slide sheared off
>take it back to the front
>they give me two other guns to shoot instead

>Glocks, never again.

>>33402199

Did you even watch the video you linked?

>Update: Underwood examined the ammo and found that some of the projectiles (made by Lehigh) were undersized. They were loose in the cases and, when mine chambered, it got pressed down into the case. This caused a serious overpressure incident. Underwood has purchased new laser inspection equipment to verify projectile dimensions so this sort of incident can be avoided in the future.

The choice between a 1911 and a Glock (or any other polymer autopistol) is a tradeoff between:

a gun that will function satisfactorily 99% of the time out of the box but has a short service life and will require part replacement after a few thousand rounds

and

a gun that with functionality that is dependant on the worksmanship and will function many human lifetimes if manufactured properly or will malfunction often and require gunsmithing to bring up to a dependable functioning level

The 1911 is a very thick and solid chasis, the trigger and cocking mechanism is all built into interally into the frame and the tiniest tolerances can throw off the system. If the system is built to proper tolerances it will never be thrown off those tolerances no matter how much abuse the gun takes and will continue to function perfectly forever.

Compared to a polymer frame gun the trigger system is often built into a lightweight and flimsy self contained trigger chassis. These trigger and cocking systems are designed to function in a wide range of tolerances but because all the assemblies are so lightly built they have a life and will wear out and will need to be replaced after a short time.

watch this video on how 1911's are made at Les Baer's shop. By hand fitting a gun you are using human feel to tell if the correct tolerances are achieved and that the gun is not working against stresses that will cause the gun to malfunction
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dpdy8QQ-Y-Q

>>33392575
>Gali
Ahhhh, my waifu.
>>33398249
Always thought the Ko toa/matoran seemed to be the the more interesting ones.
They tended to be the least edgy without being full on comedy like Le Toa/Matoran.

>>33391538
I am not even a fan or supporter of the 1911, but that picture is baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaait.

File: reaction34.png (167KB, 315x333px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 315x333px

>>33391586
Tpbp