Tank Thread of the Day

File: T55-M18.jpg (39KB, 593x350px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 593x350px

posting what few images I have on hand

File: 1464469815251.jpg (728KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

728KB, 1280x960px

also if anyone could give me the type of tank in pic related: I'm no good when it comes to telling modernized T-72s from T-90s.

File: Grant Command 001.jpg (128KB, 1024x665px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1024x665px

>>33374410

>>33374200
T-90A (2004 variant)
More interesting - autoloader loadout (circle of munition in the middle)
13 HE-GRAG
5 APFSDS
4 GL-ATGM
No HEAT in the autoloader.

>>33375282
>13 HE-FRAG
Forgive me \k\omrdes for my typo

>>33375282
TY anon. It was also curious about the green projectiles, which I assume are the ATGMs.

File: 1459289354364.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

>>33377905

File: 14676769658230.jpg (46KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 500x500px

> mfw tank thread

>>33374174
>developed by a Bosnian unit in one of their workshops.
>It consists of a M18 turret mounted on a T-55 tank hull.
>The workshop added a circular ring to make up the difference in diameter between a M-55 turret and the much smaller M18 turret.

File: TankBiathlon2013-41.jpg (2MB, 2138x1425px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2138x1425px

Dumping all I have, but you should of migrated your data tho

What's the inside of an Abrams like during actual operation? Is it comfy?

>>33374165
It's ъ, not ь.

File: 1481363511877.jpg (432KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

432KB, 1920x1080px

My favourite tank

>>33377944
Why wouldn't they just eat in the tank?

>>33377974
If you're a manlet, yes, very comfortable as long as the cooling vest is working.

If you are not a manlet, or the vest conks out.. God help you.

>>33374165
i really like the object 640 (t80um2 black eagle) way more then the t14, t14 is an ugly disappointment

>>33375282
Why does a mbt have that many frag roundts and so few apfsds rounds? Wasn't it build to fight ither tanks?

>>33379264
fighting infantry is probably way more likely then a tank on tank

>>33379297
Fair enough. Is this also typical for western tanks? What was the loadout of an abrams in 2003? And in the first gulf war?

>>33374246
Could you call the Pereh a tank though? AFAIK the gun is only for deception, it doesn't actually fire.

>>33379320
As far as I know the Abrams doesn't have an HE round. The closest thing is HEAT-MP (multi purpose). I think it's mission dependent for western tanks though.

File: t-90a & cutie.jpg (141KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 960x960px

>>33375282
Look closer, it's 6 APFSDS and 12 HE-FRAG-FS.

File: t-90a swag.jpg (301KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 1280x960px

>>33375282
Also there are two HEAT rounds on the pic: one in the top right corner of the blanket, another in the bottom right corner.

File: america.jpg (145KB, 1242x1227px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1242x1227px

>>33374186
Quick question from an uneducated faggot, are british tanks even good? Just curious tbqh

>>33380066
also pic unrelated