R51

>>33361381
>aesthetic
>>>/fa/

File: Remington Barrel Codes 2.jpg (101KB, 881x653px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 881x653px

>>33361381
No, It's still shit.

I've given up on Remington, everything they've produced after 1993 is rubbish. It's not even Remington anymore, it's just a crappy capital management company cashing in on the name.

Hopefully, they'll return from the ashes one day. As of right now, they're garbage. Here's a chart if anyone wants to find GOOD Remington, the kind of Remington I used to sperg about.

>>33361453
>I've given up on Remington, everything they've produced after 1993 is rubbish. It's not even Remington anymore, it's just a crappy capital management company cashing in on the name.

Sad, but true. The Chinese are now making better 870 clones than Remington can.

MAC did a review on the second gen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MUJWIOnURQ

>>33361527
How to watch any MAC vid:
1. Open vid.
2. Drag slider bar to the last 5 minutes, where the actual content is.
3. Use the 25 minutes of your life you just saved for something worthwhile.

But yeah, even he panned the "2nd" R51. Remington just can't unfuck themselves, not when they have to answer to Cerberus Capital Management.

>>33361643
>Zed
Is this the real Zed? It's been so long

File: hotgarbageRP9.jpg (112KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 600x450px

>>33361381
Do you actually think they fixed it? Remington can fuck up the easiest designs on the planet to produce. The Chinese are making better 870's and their Glock clone is a lump of shit.

>>33361660
Yep. How's things?

File: perfection.jpg (1MB, 2400x1600px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2400x1600px

>>33361381
No, but it looks neat.

Buy one.

>>33362121
>that filename
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA holy hell man, that's good.

>>33361381
>I like the idea of a grip safety for CC
then get a Springfield, cuz the R51 is shit.