Two independently rotational turrets - why not?

>>33347012
Too tall

>>33347012
Do you know how much one weighs?

Sure, the same IED can now take out targets worth 4x-5x as much.

Why, so it can shoot two different things at once? Just use two separate tanks

power, weight, structural integrity, crew complement

File: 1477238117621.jpg (114KB, 960x922px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 960x922px

What if both fired at the same time but at completely opposite directions.

>>33347012
1 bigger gun > 2 smaller guns.

>>33347142
Asking the important questions.

>>33347174
That's fucking cool

>>33347012
lel good luck relaodan that shit

Cannons are obsolete against modern defensive capabilities

Replace those 2 turrents with a VLS

File: 2dd.jpg (15KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 300x300px

>>33347012
As an engineer, this shit is a nightmare to build... Even to imagine the all the fucking mechanics

>>33348185
Found the guy who made the F-5

>>33347012
Why not 3?

>>33348270
Which "F-5" do you speak of?

>>33347012
> turret basket inside a turret basket
> one gunner crammed below
> other gunner suspended in mid air
> loader on the other loaders shoulders OR a two tier autoloader
> commander calling out different targets for different guns from somewhere within the mechanical labyrinth inside
> either needs a bigger engine or to reduce weight thus less armour, making it a bigger target or an easier target to kill
> fucking tall as shit
> weight displacement shot to hell
> needs better gun stabilisation to account for another mcfucking turret being thrown around on top
> if youre in a situation where you HAVE to engage two targets simultaneously and have no backup, and cant wait <7 seconds for the reload, you really fucked up somewhere

Just off the top of my head.

>>33347012
More Importantly, why don't we put a Gavin on top of a Gavin?

File: T-35_01.jpg (78KB, 800x404px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 800x404px

>>33347174
How many turrets do you have?
Like maybe one or two right now my dude.
You're like a little baby. Watch this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2C5yek0jto

>>33347012
half the turret is inside the tank nigga think before you post bullshit.

File: char.jpg (30KB, 602x259px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 602x259px

>>33349206

no u r bby

>>33347012
Larger crew + More to fire = harder for the TC to use operate his tank in an efficient manner, it's one of the key reasons multi-turret tanks never saw extensive use

>>33348147
Not to the sorry bastards at El-Alamein and Kasserine Pass

Why not have one turret with two barrels side by side style. This seems like a feasible idea but what the fuck do I know

>>33347012
Why stop at 2?

Why not 6?

>>33349443
Like the Maus's coax 75mm?

>>33349444
Refer to the above pics of T-35's

File: kv6.jpg (27KB, 500x182px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 500x182px

>>33349288
What's that? I couldn't hear you over the sound of the motherland being defended.

>>33347017
t. manlet

>>33349513
shallow creek surrounded by muddy soil would completely disable this


also any kind of small ww2 era bridge would probably collapse

>>33349543
Do you doubt the power of mighty KV-6?
Gulag for you.

>Top turret turns one way
>Bottom turret turns the other way
>Get them turning fast enough produces a whirlpool effect, sucking all the enemy towards the tank

>>33349479
Something that looks like a double barrel shotgun, mays guns are dif caliber based on 2 sec googling

>>33347171
underrated post

/thread

>>33349139
So basically a tank from 40K.

>>33349586
Make the barrels airfoils so you can swooce away from bad situations

File: 2s35 koalitsiya-sv prototype (2).jpg (135KB, 1024x738px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 1024x738px

>>33349443

>>33349790
Perfection. Just what I was thinking about

>>33349790
Holy fuck that is glorious! I love it and need 20 for science reasons and stuff

>>33349685
BAE Land Raiders when?

>>33349513
>have to turn
>better hope there is nothing within 500 ft on either side of me

>>33347142
Zero recoil

>>33350240
Canceled recoil doesn't mean no recoil, you would still have recoil.
No recoil would mean nothing happened

>>33349435
But the M3 was the best tank in the desert for a long while despite being a stopgap tank.

File: image.jpg (19KB, 305x165px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 305x165px

>>33349790
>We Terran Republic now

>>33347012
Where would you put the crew? They'd have their extremities cut off.

File: 14330715438150.jpg (111KB, 495x1201px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 495x1201px

>>33350536
We are many things, really.

>>33350567
Just recruit dwarfs

File: tacticaltank.png (334KB, 618x744px) Image search: [Google]

334KB, 618x744px

>>33347012
>>33349444
>>33348510
Hmmmmm

>>33352079
>Spin the top 4 turrets fast enough
>Achieve flight
>Use the other 6 turrets to rain down terror on your enemies

Find a flaw

>>33350268
ZERO
RECOIL

>>33352079
Just add some AA gun on top and we're golden

File: 1480838205576.gif (458KB, 500x282px) Image search: [Google]

458KB, 500x282px

>>33352115
You got me, anon.

>>33349435
Pissed of Italian and German are pretty dangerous
I dont think that exist any medium ww2 tank that could take an hit from a 88 or a 90/53

>>33349443
What exactly does that accomplish aside from taking twice as long to load?

>>33352855
you just press the b button desu.

>>33349513
>People think this would be a viable design
>These same people think the Maus would have been the solution to all of Germany's severe logistical and material problem in 1945
Cool but what the fuck can it do besides waste fuel and break down?

>>33352115
FUND IT

>>33347012
>heavy
>expensive
>tall
>impractical
>negligible benefits compared to downsides
>with the amount of weight you're gaining with a second turret, you could put something practical on instead, like heavier armor.

>>33347174
I don't think OP was including sponsons in his definition of turret.

>>33352079
A weapon to surpass metal gear

File: 1489883393019.png (2MB, 584x3300px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 584x3300px

>>33352079
what is this little league?

>>33354869
A WEAPON TO SURPASS METAL GEAR!

>>33354869
NEEDS MORE DAKKA

>>33354869
>be advised

>>33347012
why not just have one bigger turret with better armor, guns, and crew layout?

>>33354869
PAINT ER RED TA GO FASTA!

>>33347142
Too small. 4 barrels in all cardinal directions. Bum rush into the center of a formation and just start unloading.

>>33352115
I'm pretty sure this was outlined in Trump's first executive order.

File: tonk.png (2MB, 584x3300px)

2MB, 584x3300px

>>33354869
step it up

>>33355324
thats a stronk tonk

File: tovarish.jpg (134KB, 500x353px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 500x353px

>>33350195
it dosen't need to turn it will drive straight to berlin

OP is clearly not a 19K

File: DYE SPONSON.jpg (600KB, 901x3300px) Image search: [Google]

600KB, 901x3300px

>>33355407
>making more tonk in only one direction.

The ancients truly knew the secrets of tonk.

>>33354869
Hello,
I am from Lockheed Martin, we're interested in aquring the rights to reproduce this design. Can you please get in touch at [email protected]

Kind regards,
Mr Lockheed

File: 300px-Halo-wars-unsc-grizzly.png (78KB, 300x252px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 300x252px

>>33350536

>>33355290

Too small.

Six barrels, two tiers, like a hokum. Autoloading, of course.

High rotation, alternating fire.

The Helitank.