Would it have worked?
Yeah sure why not.
>>33340644
OP just wanted to have a good thread, but this teenage chick wants to sass up the thread.
If you can act like a chick, you can take dick like one, senpai.
>>33340665
Yeah sure why not.
>inb4 twenty posts about how the MiG-15/17/F-86/etc were stolen from the Ta 183
The Pulqui II is the closest thing to the Ta 183 that flew, especially with how many FW engineers worked on both.
>>33340845
not so fast.
The Saab J29 Tunnan is the closest thing.
>>33340675
kek
>>33340947
The only real influence the Ta 183 had on the SAAB 29 was the swept-wing research done by German engineers that was studied by a Swedish engineer.
>>33340947
>tfw you will never shoot down a UFO.
>>33341228
>planes will NEVER be this shiny again
>>33341242
What sad times in which we live.
>>33340559
>Tfw we'd be a space faring race with aesthetic spacecraft but instead the Jews won and we spend all our resources taking care of smelly third worlders
>>33341228
>>33341242
>>33341282
I wonder if in the following centuries people will look at early shiny jets like we look at shining medieval armor.
>>33340559
with a proper tail yes
>>33341242
Sure they will.
Once the "global norm" of not using nukes is broken sometime in the next few years, planes will be back to that qt mirror finish to avoid heating from the flash.
>>33340559
Nah, still would've wound up bombed to shit by the Allies.
>>33341402
no
rcs is important now
>>33341415
You don't actually HAVE to cover the entire jet in RAM to achieve low RCS. A thick strip near the edges accomplishes nearly just as much.
>>33341109
are you blind?
other than the tail plane location, the plane looks like a carbon copy.
>>33343134
>the plane looks like a carbon copy.
by this logic there are tons of aircraft that are just carbon copies of others