You have to choose a battle rifle for an army. This rifle has to be bullpup and 7.62. What rifle would it be?
>>33291678
>it can't be an MDR
;^)
Hard to find decent modeen designs since bullpups and battle rifles are both outdated.
So I choose the 7.62 NATO FAMAS prototype.
>>33291678
SCAR 17s
>>33291678
>>33291749
>>33291771
must to be real. its for an army
>>33291749
>>33291771
My fucking dick cannot become more erect after seeing this.
Mass produced when?
>>33291678
That prototype bullpup FAL.
I'd finish up the R&D and work out the kinks and it should be good.
>>33291805
Bullpups mostly came unto the scene after the battlerifle fad, you're pretty much limited to a tiny selection of prototypes and RDBs
>>33291732
>outdated
I don't think you know what that means.
>>33291805
SCAR 17s is real
>>33291829
Yeah, I do.
Bullpups are pointless with modern fast burning powder and battle rifles were never ideal, the US forced them onto NATO for no real reason. They've aince come to their senses so now there's no reason to field one unless that's all you have and can't afford to replace them. Sounds outdated to me boss.
>>33291871
As if modern powder negates the effect of a longer barrel and more compact rifle?
If they're "outdated", then what about those new bullpups and current users of bullpups?
>>33291678
Not something held together with screws.
>>33291678
Just get a KH2002 upsized for 7.62 Nato. It would literally be consdered as a bullpup AR10
Probably picture related,runs on 6.5 Grendel.
Mandatory x1.5 to 5 power scope.
>>33291983
To add on this the whole part around the bolt would probably be Galil ACE pastern or similar to keep dirt and mud out.
>>33291847
ok so where to buy it?
>>33291871
Modern powder doesn't mean bullpups are obsolete. It means sbr's are less of a shitty compromise. They are still superior if you want not shit ballistics out of a compact rifle
>SBR queens will defend this
I don't care if mk262 makes is slightly better. Your 10.5 inch barrel is fucking stupid and the only reason the military uses them is because it's an economy of scale. Congratulations, you bought into a huge compromise because you blindly follow militaries making decisions for economic reasons rather than performance
>>33291678
would a polymer trigger group work worth a damn? I just got an idea for a low effort bullpup.
>>33294583
*reeeee* screams the rifle.
>>33291678
>This rifle has to be bullpup and 7.62
I make one abomination, and then sell it for $0.01 as milsurp.
Battlerifles are dead and bullpups are memes for a reason.
>>33291749
mmmm resting my cheek on picante rail
>>33294583
My shoulder hurts just looking at this
7.62
>>33291678
>>33294633
Has a rubber pad
>>33294583
The rifle that hates lefties
>>33294662
god the groza makes me diamonds
>>33291678
Why the fuck bullpup?
>>33295430
Because it is more compact and ergonomic and in my opinion should be the future
The RFB KEL TEC could be used in a real battle or is it just to use at home?
>>33297426
i wouldn't trust lel kek for rough and tumble use.
>>33291678
I'm surprised more people dont know about this baby yet
I will be ordering on when I get my tax refund
>>33291678
Something like this.
>>33297491
good enough to be used in a battle?
>>33297596
I would assume so
The frame is aluminum and most of the internals are AR-10 parts
>>33297458
whats the problem with RFB?
>>33297523
>.30 carbine
That ain't a battle rifle, bud
>>33297676
>7.62 bullets
>Bullpup
>Battleproven
Checks all the boxes
>>33294583
>yfw 7.62 NATO Moritas
>>33297715
Except it's an intermediate cartridge and to be a battle rifle it has to fire a rifle length round.
Fuck it, we'll just make this real.
>>33291678
>>33297972
I wonder how it really works, if it works at all
>>33297893
Use the comfortable looking one from reach instead and were in business
>>33297989
Not like that.
There is a drawing based on the patent info that shows a better view.
>>33297491
I always wanted one of the old M17s rifles. I can't drop $2k for one of these, though. Maybe I'll find a better deal on a used one in a few years.
>>33296499
>>33291678
SCAR-17 with bullpup conversion kit
>>33298771
its a good ideia but its good/trustable enough?
probably theres an hk (mr762) option
>>33297794
>Except it's an intermediate cartridge and to be a battle rifle it has to fire a rifle length round.
Oh, you mean the battle rifle no one's actually used in battle since the 1960s? I thought this was with an eye toward real world use, nevermind. Here you go then.
>>33298470
could you post the img?
>>33299276
>Has never heard of Falklands war...
>>33292937
>if I can't buy it it isn't real
>>33292937
https://www.sru-precision.com/blank-2
closest I could find.