My google fu is weak. Could anyone point me towards some page listing what loadout options the Danes used for their F35 Draken planes?
Also, I'm having some issues making heads or tail of the noses. Is it just the "normal" nose-cone for the F35, with those having a "step" under the chin all being RF-35, or does the F-35 have some of those as well? Seems to be something called a WDNS nose that might have been fitted to the F35?
Some Draken pics in return for putting up with my nonsense. Feel free to re-purpose this thread for general aircraft porn if you feel like it.
why are saabs so secksy
>>33273047
>Is it just the "normal" nose-cone for the F35, with those having a "step" under the chin all being RF-35, or does the F-35 have some of those as well?
Both RF-35XD and F-35XD those steps on nose, step is slightly bigger on RF and there are more windows for cameras.
Paint's a bit worn...
>>33273202
Ok, so the chin step seems to have been introduced with the upgrades then, as obviously >>33273059 >>33273052 >>33273094 not all F35 had them.
Now for what they carried and what paint that was in.
>>33273235
>Now for what they carried and what paint that was in.
Here is good bit about modeling Danish Drakens.
http://modelingmadness.com/review/mod/sweden/plesdraken.htm
Bumpy.
>>33273303
Not.
>>33273318
Something completely different.
Are Draken's the Aston Martins of the aircraft world? Not the best performers but the best aesthetic fighters of all time.
>>33273363
I think they're ugly desu
The Saab, not the Aston Martin
I still appreciate them though.
>>33273363
Other aircraft come in bumpy and non bumpy.
Possibly (visually) Hurricane to the Drakens Spitfire.
>>33273404
>I think they're ugly desu
>The Saab, not the Aston Martin
Shit taste.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiwLxnUaeY8
>>33273298
I'll keep that one around.