Got my first gun.

Pretty good id say

>>33266769
I wanted one but it looks so much like a toy gun.

>>33266769
about as good as bronze at the special olympics

>>33266810

That is pretty fucking good I would say.

>>33266769
How long have you been serving on the Galactica?

PCC are fun as fuck, especially if youre shooting at steel

>>33266814
yup, you won but you're still retarded. pretty good.

>>33266806

Long-time owner of three (one of the first guns I bought when I turned 18 in 2008). Quality firearm. I have one in the discontinued .45 ACP, one .40 S&W that takes PX4 magazines, and one 9mm that takes 92 magazines.

My only complaints:

1. The front rail that extends out is pretty flimsy, limiting what I'd feel comfortable mounting to it.
2. The sights are very dated and I wish Beretta would mill them off as Sierra Papa does, or even add in some ARX style flip sights. Not many optic choices for co-witness: I have an old Aimpoint Mark III mounted to mine. About the lowest optic I've found for the gun. I took a drill bit to the Short Range rear optic to make it larger, more like a ghost ring sight.

I mean, that's literally all I can bitch about. IMO, it's pretty much the best PCC in it's price range. Used to PS90's were 700-800 but that's not the case anymore.

>>33266810
thats because you got gold

FRACKING CYLONS

File: IMG_20170310_225217.jpg (2MB, 4032x1737px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x1737px

>>33266810
I'd just be happy to compete at the special Olympics.

Not so sure how I feel about this bottom rail and I don't want to pay $60 for the side/ bottom rail attachment. I'd rather save up for the px4 9mm pistol.

>>33266769
I swear the cx4 has been used in more mass shootings than any other gun

>>33266769

Maybe. How much you spend?

>>33267075
Aww come on man I think there was just that one in Canada about 2006 or something.

>>33267064

The rail is flimsy as fuck.

Just pony up the money for the extra side rail and bottom rail attachment if you need that, and go ahead and get a DeSantis storm packer.

Pretty good I'd say.

>>33267075
that isn't a Hi Point carbine

>>33267083
$775 for the gun, two 15 round magazines, and a box of 100 rounds.

File: 3456345734.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>33267064
They are pretty fucking good desu. Much happier with it then my glawk fawty. Only mild complaint is if you walk the slide it has a tendency not to fully go into battery. A little tap fixes it and time seems to have made it disappeared but it bugged the shit out of me the first few days.

>>33267088
Fuck yes my man! I've been thinking about which of those to buy. Look like that will be what I'm going with.

>>33267099

For a 9mm that isn't horrible nowadays but you might have done a little cheaper looking around.

But not horrible.

At one point the 9mm ones were going for 800-900+ used

>>33267011
How about the shit long trigger pull?

Also it's not made in US so you can't thread the barrel.

other than that I like it.

>>33267121

1. Feels fine to me.
2. Who gives a shit
3. But if you do give a shit, Sierra Papa has you covered if you have a wallet made of shekels.

File: IMG_20170310_230208.jpg (2MB, 3090x1771px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3090x1771px

>>33267102
I have an old barrel condom too from my old paintball days.

>>33267113
There was only one shop within 100 miles of my house that had it in stock. I bought the last one so now everyone else is fucked.

File: IMG_20170310_230709.jpg (305KB, 978x1635px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 978x1635px

>>33267121
>>33267164

How would one go about attaching a silencer to this gun legally. Also how much would it cost all said and done?

>>33267222

Probably be cheapest to register it as an SBR since there is a back and forth over whether SBR's need to be 922r compliant, but many people say they don't since they're SBR's.

I don't know if anyone has ever made a clamp on threading for the CX4 but something could probably be fabricated. Might be "naughty" but I doubt you'll get dragged to prison for it if the suppressor is legal

>>33266769

pccs are interesting guns but kinda pointless when a a .40 S&W has roughly the same muzzle energy from a pistol as a 115 grain fmj 9mm from a 16 inch barrel

thats not to say i wouldnt wanna get shot with a pcc.

anyways, neat gun my dude

t. guy who bought a hipoint carbine when .22lr was unobtanium and 9mm was in wal mart and i could plink

>>33267280
If I absolutely had to register it as an SBR in order to attach a suppressor would I be able to just get a new shorter barrel akin to the Mx4 that's already threaded? Would that require 2 stamps at that point?

File: image.jpg (95KB, 1024x573px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 1024x573px

>>33267020
Underrated

File: TNW Firearms_Velocity_357SIG_PressRelease_sm.jpg (596KB, 1275x1650px) Image search: [Google]

596KB, 1275x1650px

>>33266769
should've just gotten one of these

>>33267397
i wonder how similar those are to "just right carbines"?
i wanted a pcc to fuck around with for fun and after a lot of consideration, i went with the cz evo. but using glock mags with the JRC was notable consideration

>>33267280
why would he need to sbr it?
whats wrong with paying a smith to thread the barrel then attaching a silencer?

>>33267397
yeah then a whole 5 people would be shooting .357sig meme caliber.

>>33267397
I like the Cx4's more futuristic looking, almost bulpup like design. I could have just got a 9mm AR-15 if I wanted something like that. Pretty cool nonetheless though.

>>33267447
but muh velocity and accuracy
considerably better effective range as well

>>33267431

Imported weapon, some say threading constitutes violation of 922r as it is no longer a "sporting firearm".

I don't think anyone gives a shit, but it is the law technically.

>>33267397

Nah.

1. The Chiappa M1's are nice as they are interchangeable with many USGI M1 carbine parts and take beretta 92 mags.
2. Ruger made a PCC back in the day. It's nice but pricey now.
3. Marlin Camp 9's have become somewhat collectible and prices have went up as PCC popularity has increased, also can rig magazines to it but even those magazines aren't the cheapest in the world.
4. AR-style tiered trash guns deserve no mention
5. You start getting into more obscure shit like Taurus carbines, Caracal carbines (if you can fucking find one, but great guns), Steyr/B&T, Lusa, Linda/Wilkinson, Pioneer PPSH carbines, etc.

>>33266825

REMOVE TOASTER FROM PREMISES

>>33266769
I always wanted one. They are the best when it comes to putting down cylon skinjobs.

>>33266825
>>33267579
>>33267636

I'm not sure what any of this means. I guess I'll have to watch Battlestar Galactica now since I own the gun!

>>33266769
Depends, what caliber and magazine type?

92fs compatible Cx4 was my first modern rifle, and i've since sucessfuly recruited several people to serve on the galactica.

>>33267011
Common micro red dots should co-witness easily enough, i've tried three. Hell, my primary arms didn't even need to be adjusted.

>>33267064
That rail is only usable for a flashlight. I have a siderail, it doesn't get used. Don't stick too much shit on it-get a light, get a dot, get the packer, leave it alone. Those are all that gun will ever need to do whatever you need it to do.

>>33266769
CX4s are pretty good bro, I love my PCCs.

>>33266769
These guns would be top-tier if they can in 10mm auto

Then again everyone gun would be top-tier with a 10mm auto version, even AK's.

>>33267759
Does price really matter when it comes to a dot sight? I have an old $50 NcStar red/ green dot sight from when I used to play airsoft.

>>33267784

Yes, IMO.

That NCStar is a far inferior product when you start using other optics. Plus I don't even know if it could sustain the constant recoil of a CX4 without losing zero.

Chinks use shitty low grade aluminum to mass produce those

>>33266769
looks like a lot of fun. Definitely not a long-range round, but nothing stopping you from mastering the fundamentals out to 100yds.

Might be fun to get into a self-defense range course. Short range scope and a strap, maybe a fore handle would be good add-ons.

>>33266825
Came into to post. Good job Anon.

>>33266985

I think you're retarded for using Bronze at the OLYMPICS in a negative way. Because then you've just insulted yourself. What have you accomplished even close to that? Lol

>>33267784
Yes. Good materials are important, and so is good labor.

>>33267955
Get out, noguns.

>>33267222
you'd need to have the barrel threaded first. if you have a competent local gunsmith, they might be able to do it. otherwise, you'd have to send it to a company to get it threaded.
then, you'd need to go about your purchase process for the silencer. there are websites that walk you through that process

>>33267925
>>33268102
Well so far on the shopping list I have:
DeSantis packer
The side/ bottom rail mount
A flashlight/ laser combo
And for a dot sight I'm thinking a Bushnell TRS25 like this beast of a man here:
https://youtu.be/HWO-JNwKCMI

>>33268207
Would it be 922r compliant if I went that route? Earlier in the thread it looked like the consensus was no but no one knew for sure. Even online it says that it's pretty much up to the agent or officer trying to charge you.

>>33268271
you would want to check the barrel length (threading a barrel shouldn't remove any length) and overall length of the gun. http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2012/10/daniel-zimmerman/want-a-short-barreled-rifle-heres-how/ explains it pretty well.
unless your state/local laws differ from the NFA ruling on SBR, you shouldn't need to get a sbr tax stamp to get a suppressor tax stamp.

unironically, call and ask your local ATF/PD office and ask then, they'd be the officers you'd most likely deal with when using a sbr/suppressor

>>33268341
Heh I would have never thought about calling and asking. That's like consorting with the enemy but I guess they aren't reeeeally the enemy.

File: nice.png (19KB, 178x94px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 178x94px

>>33266769
Now buy a PX4 with a $75 rebate to accompany your PCC with magazine interchangeability.

You can get a PX4 fullsize for $350

File: roni-conversion-kit-for-beretta-px4-storm-499-vancouver-surrey_8149403.jpg (23KB, 700x417px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 700x417px

>>33268483
That will definitely be my next purchase then after that I really want the get the Roni conversion kit for it.

>>33268384
sometimes you have to ask, "what does it take for you to shoot my doggo?" to figure out what steps to avoid

>>33266769
Quite alright.
9mm is nice from a carbine barrel (so it's a pretty acceptable defensive performer in a well handling package) and you can shoot it for pretty damn cheap, quite alright for someone to learn fundamentals on. It's got a bit more oomph than a .22 so that's a pretty fun aspect.

If you're in Canada, get some Beretta pistol magazines, if you're somewhere else, get some MecGar magazines in 18 (flush), 20 or 30 round capacity.

>>33267222
Have someone thread the barrel. Then either keep a thread protector on there until you get your paperwork done for your silencer (or see where the Hearing Protection Act is going).

Optionally, thread the barrel and then have a flash-hider fitted (preferrably with loctite), and get a Quick Detach silencer that fits that hider, QD silencers have a strong lockup and don't walk like they can do on threads, on top of being fast to place and remove.
You'll want to use 147gr subsonics for best effect, it will still be relatively loud with normal supersonics.

>>33267353
>what is a stock
>what is multiple points of contact
>what is better inherent accuracy
To me, .40S&W is best suited as a carbine cartridge anyway.

>>33267362
If the barrel is less than 16" long, it's an SBR and needs a stamp.

Silencers require a stamp too (for now) and can be used on whatever gun you feel like. For instance, some people get a .22 silencer to use on both their pistol and rifle.
Some people use their .223 silencer on their .22 rifle

>>33267011
I have a couple additional complaints
>long, heavy, gritty trigger pull with a mushy, long reset
I mean, I know PCC's aren't really up to the task of serious marksmanship, but that's no excuse to half-ass the trigger. Especially in a relatively expensive gun from a company known for decent triggers.
>safety is wobbly in an oversized hole and feels like Chinese ABS plastic
I have absolutely zero faith in it working and not breaking even under light range use
>front sling stud is ridiculously long for no reason
I mean c'mon, why?
>barrel is too thin to thread and still have an appreciable shoulder to journal against
Basically nocans: the gun unless you replace the barrel or spend the cost of the gun on properly installing a 3-lug setup to use obsolete and heavy cans from the 70's.

>>33267553
>The Chiappa M1's are nice
They're actually really not, they fail to feed all the time and generally everyone who handles them complain about them.

>as they are interchangeable with many USGI M1 carbine parts
Like what, the stock? It's a blowback carbine made to look like an M1

Mechanically, it's similar to the Ruger PC9, except the Ruger is very well made and the Chiappa isn't at all.
There's probably few, if any action or mechanical parts which interchange with an M1

>>33268483
OP should make sure to determine whether or not his gun uses 92 mags or PX4 mags.

>>33266769
I really want to SBR one iso it can look like the MX4

Cut the thing between the stock and the grip

>>33270312
Pay someone competent to do it, it wont be pretty if OP just hacksaws it.

That said, I've seen some of these with the "thumbhole" thing cut out and then smoothed over, and it looks very nice and clean.

>>33267353
Pointless if you hate fun and practicality sure. Sure it doesn't suddenly become a 5.56 but faster more accurate hits count a lot more than extra fps if you want to take things seriously

>>33267362
You could just find a muzzle device with a suppressor mount and have that pinned and welded to the barrel. But for the price you may as well just SBR it. There are far better sources for this type of thing and the guys at Beretta forums have been through it all

>>33270312

why?

>>33267397
They make those in Oregon and i got real hype til i found out it is glock mags only. I asked for m&p and they said no.

>>33267165
>buying in a store
You're fucking retarded.

>>33267397
Would literally rather have a H&R single shot. Hell a generic revolver would be fine. All these damn survival rifles trying to be an M1 carbine in a Para stock and sucking.

>>33267553
>The Chiappa M1's are nice
Fundamentally incorrect and an accurate indication of your post and your intelligence.

>>33266769
Fuck you. Ive been trying to find one in 40

I have a 9mm cx4 for sale in Missouri

Email mokmeet at aol

>>33267075
>field tested
cool

>>33266769
Can I get this in New York?

>>33273227

I'll ship it to an ffl without a mag

>>33273247
What''s the mag cap?

>>33273319

It takes Beretta magazines so it varies

>>33273319

New York is technically 7 but 10 rounders are accepted barring you "don't load them past 7". Stupid liberals.

The CX4 .45 magazines by default hold 8.

However, doesn't NY have something against thumbhole stocks? If so, that eliminates the CX4.

>>33273468
Can't have more than one spooky feature. Detachable magazine is one, thumb hole is two

>>33270937
>Not holding a gun that you plan on spending more than $300 dollars on before you purchase it.
You, my friend, are the retard.

File: FrankenStorm+3+cropped,+resized+for+web.jpg (676KB, 1500x892px) Image search: [Google]

676KB, 1500x892px

>>33273468
Sierra Papa can take care of the thumbhole stock.

>>33274194
Folding stock and a short barrel would make this a pretty cool gun.

>>33267020
>SensibleChuckle.gif

>>33274228

i dunno the storm looks bad 100% of the time whenever you try to fuck with it. if you really want a 9mm sbr just get an evo, at least it has a folding stock build for it.