ITT: Legality of Hypothetical Situations

just shoot the nigger if you live in a non libcuck state and you will be fine

>>33265846
Most places with decent gun laws consider breaking into an occupied structure to be a shooting offense. a political activest prosecutor may try to make a case against you if the house is unoccupied, they are unarmed, and the round enters from the back. that case will likely fail though. if they are armed or the structure is occupied then no prosecutor in their right mind would bring charges on you in non cuck states.

>>33265911
That's what I thought, but was unsure if an emotional plea, whether it be that they were unarmed/had no identifiable weapon or hit from behind, would be enough to build a case against me.

>>33265846

You never seen them climb through the window. You just go in and just happen to find them and then shoot their ass.

>>33265846
I'm sure it's legal, but I'd probably not shoot at some fuckhead climbing through a window if my family was still inside the house. Weird shit happens with bullets, man.

>>33265999
>Checked.
I plan on shooting my kids with small caliber bullets so they build up an immunity, so hitting them wouldn't be a problem.

>>33265846
man that house and setting look gorgeous. I'm assuming europoor by the stone.

>>33266120
I wish that was my home, but I actually just googled house in the woods. Disappearing into nature while retaining some creature comforts is merely my goal in life.

>>33265846
>>Inb4 bury them in the woods.
But this is a thing that happens.

>>33265846
"In the clear?" No.
There's a chance you'd get off, but also a chance you'd go to prison. Individual states have pretty distinct standards for justified homicide and defense of a structure.