what's the point of pilots when we have tomahawks?
>>33248076
Tomahawks are hard to throw
>>33248076
Tomahawks don't loiter.
Whats the point of Tomahawks when we have ICBMs?
>>33248076
because the indians cant make the tomahawks big enough.
>>33248103
icbms scare people.
>>33248098
ok, ya got me.
time to live. Lots of stuff can happen between launch and impact
>>33248138
It'll be our little secret
>>33248138
If they fly in the general direction of certain countries for too long, a nuclear holocaust will happen.
Tomahawk tend not to land so well and they always start fights in the officers mess.
No one wants to mid air refuel a tomahawk?
>>33248188
No one actually wants to do anything, they just want the intensive that comes along with doing it.
>>33248076
Well, when you want to teach a baby a lesson do you cut its head off? No, you paddle it. There can be circumstances where it's just as foolish to rain cruise missiles on an enemy cityas it would be to spank a baby with an axe.
>>33248098
They don't?
>>33248188
Dude I'd totally be down to try.
>>33248334
planefaguuuus btfo again!
>>33248346
wew, where'd you find that?
>>33248334
That's correct. Your image doesn't disprove this in the slightest.
>>33248351
/k/
>>33248346
>>33248351
>>33248511
Got one more
(I think)
>>33248076
propaganda/recruitment
>>33248115
We need bigger Indians.
has DARPA started work on that yet?
>>33248076
Reusable way of dropping warheads. It also provides flexibility because you can cancel the mission and get the munitions back, inspect a target before/after attack, go on a mission to provide air-cover but also have the ability to drop a bomb if the need arises, and more
>>33248511
Fucking Justice!
>I hate pigeons - fucking rats with wings.
>>33248188
Holy fuck that would be cool
Imagine a tanker with a boom that looks like a rake refuelling a dozen cruise missiles at once
>>33248076
a pilot can be recalled. a missile cannot.