can someone id the two carriers in this pic?

>tfw no ramp

why live?

i found it. its the uss john c stennis and the hms illustrious.
>>33203319
>why live?
no idea man, the poor always try to cling to life. look at hopeless hobos

Right one looks like the fag russian or china one

>>33203857
Stupid namefag continues to be stupid, more at 11

I wonder though. Why doesn't the US have any of these little ramped carriers? Seems like they'd be great for supplementing MEUs and small fleets.

>>33203917
The Marines have them, but they call them "Amphibious Assault Ships". It's a political thing.

>>33204054
They also don't have ramps because they use a lot of helicopters.

>>33204054
They can't launch aircraft though?

File: harrier-940x580.jpg (84KB, 940x580px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 940x580px

>>33204152

They have Harriers.

Probably will continue to have Harriers too because the VTOL Lightning is the most shit of the three.

>>33203290
>cringe: the picture

>>33204184
stupidest post on the board right now

>>33204184
>furthest along development
>furthest along deployment
>most practical flight time of the F-35 variants
>even if everything F-35 detractors claim about the plane is true it'd still be better than the Harrier its replacing

The size is a bit misleading. Japanese "destroyer" is about as big as nimitz-class carrier despite being half the displacement

File: size.jpg (230KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1200x900px

>>33204362

>>33204365

I hope you are aware this is a photoshop.

File: American.png (164KB, 514x256px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 514x256px

>>33204699

>>33204054
No, they're called assault ships because their primary role is to land and support troops

File: 1313457289567.jpg (939KB, 1949x1261px) Image search: [Google]

939KB, 1949x1261px

Last one. I could have sworn I had a picture of an American CVN sailing with the CdG, but I guess not.