Bulldog 44 special

>>33182651
it's like .45 ACP except instead of 7 rounds you get 5 (4 if you leave a chamber empty) and a lot less ammo choice

>>33182651
>Is 44 special a good manstopper?
It's a functional firearm, so yes.

>>33182651

because there are so SO many better firearms in that price range

>>33182651

If you already have 5+ handguns, then buy it.

Why the fuck would you buy a .44 special when the .44 magnum exists?

I would love a good .44 special revolver. Don't know about Charter quality these days.

>>33182651
anything out of that short of a barrel is basically 38 special territory

>>33182709
Because .44 mag isn't a low pressure bigbore and guns made for .44 mag are often bigger and heavier than a .44 special needs to be.

Get a .357. Easier gun to carry.

>>33182694
Find me a revolver that looks like this

Charter Arms guns are weak by design. They'll shoot factory .44 specials forever because they're also weakly loaded, but some serious stuff like Buffalo Bore or a Keith load will smash it up good.

Ruger just came out with a GP-100 in .44 Special with a 3 inch barrel and S&W's model 69's are .44 Magnums that come in 4.2 and 2.75 inch barrels. They are better made and, especially in the latter case, shoot heavy loads all goddamned day.

If you're okay with a cheaper gun, more power to you, but the ammunition is more expensive than magnums everywhere I've looked that wasn't online.

Perfect for killing replicants.

>>33183385
I don't think what you are talking about is true for the OLD charter arms guns. The new ones probably