What does /k/ think of this masterpiece?
How are you suppsed to shoot if no trigger ?
>>33170444
Pretty sure that's a prop gun
>>33170418
The mechanics of this thing are boggling my fucking mind right now
Pretty fucktarded senpai.
>>33170418
looks really fucking retarded but I like it, like it came out of Stargate, just slap a very stupid looking compensator and you're set
>>33170444
Psionic Trigger linked to owner's neural pathways
>guys, what if
>no stop listen
> what if we
> guys listen
> what if we put
>shut the fuck up
>what if we put an extra mag
>ON the gun
Holy fuck, its beautiful.
>>33170418
it's stupid and gay and it makes me angry
>>33170547
>I think it needs more mags, guys.
>No, we only t...
>Seriously, we need more mags on this gun.
>that is a fucking terrible idea...
>what if the GUN is JUST A FUCKING MAG!
>Stop.
>WE NEED MORE FUCKING GRIPS!
>>33170540
>Neural pathways
Now anyone can shoot faster than Jerry Miculek
>New model Glock recalled after several owners killed while they held the gun upside-down while firing.
>>33170418
It will finally have an actual style instead of being a fucking styleless brick
>>33170418
looks like my sausage fingers would get stuck in there.
Will explode. Twice.
>>33170418
looks good as a scifi prop
>>33170418
This is from gi Joe right?
>>33170418
Would that still be a pistol?
Looks like a VFG desu senpai
>>33170547
lol'd becuase it was the very first thing i noticed.
This version of the same N E R F gun is better.
It has a gay butt dildo in the grip.
>>33170547
>YO DAWG PUT A MAG ON MY GUN SO THAT I CAN RELOAD WHILE I RELOAD
>>33170519
it's just a magazine holder/foregrip combo on the front of it... it doesn't feed from the front magazine.
>>33171542
I'd fuck that.
>>33171542
>>33170418
>kriss recoil system
>still has a slide
>looks like it'd have a quarter inch of barrel
>ejection port all the way back there
what
>>33171762
>clearly a magazine in the grip of the pistol, and the front is holding an extra magazine and working as a forward grip
How are you people this fucking retarded.
>>33171776
I don't see a magazine in the grip of the second one
>>33170418
>>33171542
Seem like a good gun to whack peoples with.
>>33171776
wait, do you really believe that, anon come on now you have to be smarter than that
>>33171776
>>33171838
>>33171786
There are two magazines in this fake firearm anons. There are actual onboard magazine holder/foregrip combos already in existence.
>>33171901
he was talking about >>33171542 you dense motherfucker.
>>33171901
yeah sure, but were talking this one >>33171542 dumbass
I guess this must be super confusing too?
>>33171940
im confused on how anyone could like this or think its ok
>>33171933
>>33171931
That's weird because the response was directed towards the OPs picture.
Is this also confusing?
>>33171967
>I don't see a magazine in the grip of the second one
>try to prove otherwise with the first example
Don't let the door hit you on the way out, autismo.
>>33171962
I didn't make it, it's the first response when you google 'onboard magazine'.
You're probably a bit more familiar with this one since it's in a few video games.
>>33171967
are you talking about >>33171762
cause if you read the post he mostly talks about this one >>33171542
>>33171984
>I don't see a magazine in the grip of the second one
>I don't see a magazine in the second grip
? how is this not what he meant
>>33172004
My thought process, was that since he linked both posts he was talking about OPs picture and by >>33170519 this post, assumed everyone here thought it was some weird space magic.
>>33171987
what are you on about
>mfw it's just a Glock with a vertical foregrip that can hold a spare magazine
"You can't just shoot my dog!"
"That's where you're wrong, kiddo"
The bottom part looks fine if a bit retarded but then
>obvious glock slide on top
Absolutely ruins any aesthetic qualities it had
>>33172061
No, that's where YOU'RE wrong. ATF said the front rail mounted mags are OK as long as it is just intended for mag storage and not intended to be a grip. Basically, the same as an AR brace.
>>33172319
>the front rail mounted mags are OK as long as it is just intended for mag storage and not intended to be a grip
Does this indeed make it a forgrip? Does an extra magazine holder mean second grip? Does extending the trigger guard around it equal to second grip?
>>33170418
60% more boolit per boolit
>>33172405
It would be very awkward to hold, but it would, or should, still count as a grip.
>>33172319
>has grooves to increase grip
>has extension on bottom to stop front hand sliding off
>has dimples on side of magazine storage for fingers
Yeah..nah....get fucked.
>>33170418
impracticalspacegun/10
>>33170540
Hey, SG1 had great prop design and space FNs.