Rails

>>33163417
>rails make a gun mediocre

kek

>>33163417
>(you)

>>33163450
They've never made a single gun good.

File: 1462642880159.jpg (519KB, 1267x1266px)

519KB, 1267x1266px

>>33163417
Fudds like you are worse, and keymod.
Well keymod can look cool, so just fags like you OP, stop sucking so many cocks

File: 1278003574738.png (84KB, 500x500px)

84KB, 500x500px

>>33163417
>leave specializing it up the end user
How awful
>makes a gun mediocre
There are plenty of criticisms to full rails, but these aren't good ones.

>>33163462
>Now, they just make a generic gun and then leave specializing it up the end user and a million accessories manufactures, most of whom put out extremely low quality products.

I like how you blame rails for this and not the consumer. Consumers want to be able to customize their own guns. The market responded to that demand.

>>33163482
>implying rails that serve both as a hand-guard, and as a modular system for attaching things isn't an improvement

>>33163486
Think of all the shelves you can stock on that Glock...

>>33163494

tl;dr man barbie is still gay as fuck.

I will say that I hate quad-rails.
They are ugly and uncomfortable as hell to handle.
I love rails because options but all most civilians are ever gonna mount is some type of sites and or optic and maybe maybe a bi-pod.
You cant possibly make use of a full length quad rail without looking like a mall ninja.

/yeah well that just my opinion man!

>>33163527
>uncomfortable as hell to handle

Lift some weights, baby-hands.

>>33163554
That reply is imbecilic at best.

Uncomfortable is not the same as heavy or too big. The things are like handling a cheese grater.

>>33163588
>like handling a cheese grater.
What is a callous, baby-hands?